"Christoph Hormann" <chr### [at] gmxde> wrote in message
news:3E198425.B4C567A2@gmx.de...
> > It is HTML 4.01 Strict and CSS 1.0/2.0. It was my intention to produce
clean
> > and lean HTML code, there are enough good browsers for all platforms, so
I
> > do not want to support the old Netscape stuff anymore. Mozilla 1.2,
Netscape
> > 6 and 7, IE 5,5.5,6.0 are fine.
>
> Well, it is of course up to you how to design the page but i meant i did
> not recognize any elements in your page that seem impossible to be created
> in a way not messing up the page in NS 4.x.  Of ocurse not everything will
> be visible in NS 4.x as in newer browsers but it could be usable.
Texlib uses CSS and does not store any design information in the html code.
Because of the lack of css support and a lot of defects in Netscape 4.7, it
would be necessary to create the pages differently (more tables, more design
info in the code). It also does not implement the HTML 4.0 standard very
well.

Please accept my apologies for not supporting Netscape 4. Any reasons for
using it?

Rene
--
Rene Schwietzke
r.schwietzke<at>reneschwietzke.de
http://www.rene-schwietzke.de/

Post a reply to this message

> What about HtmlHelp produced from time to time?
The library might be a little bit to huge for a help file. It is currenlty
40MB and grows rapidly.

> btw: at the "Contribution" section I can't find specification of the
targeted
> POV-Ray. Do you accept only 3.5 ? 3.1 ? MegaPOV 0.7 ? 1.0 ?

Mmm...good question...the best would be to limit the support to offical
supported features or at maximum MegaPOV features. This means 3.5 and
MegaPOV 1.0. POV3.1 textures are fine too, they should work with 3.5 without
or at least after minor modifications.

We will see what kind of textures arrive. Let's postpone the decision a
little bit ;-)

Rene
--
Rene Schwietzke
r.schwietzke<at>reneschwietzke.de
http://www.rene-schwietzke.de/

Post a reply to this message

Rene Schwietzke wrote:
> 
> Texlib uses CSS and does not store any design information in the html code.
> Because of the lack of css support and a lot of defects in Netscape 4.7, it
> would be necessary to create the pages differently (more tables, more design
> info in the code). It also does not implement the HTML 4.0 standard very
> well.

You did not understand me, i didn't say "don't use any of those new
features not supported by old browsers".  I just meant it should be
possible to avoid those features messing up the result in NS 4.x.  It does
not have to look great, it only should be visible at all.

> Please accept my apologies for not supporting Netscape 4. Any reasons for
> using it?

Because it still is the standard browser on a lot of machines (all public
terminals at university here for example).  

Christoph

-- 
POV-Ray tutorials, include files, Sim-POV,
HCR-Edit and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/
Last updated 31 Dec. 2002 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______

Post a reply to this message

I will investigate this problem but cannot promise a solution. It is
definitly related to CSS. If you disable CSS in the Preferences, it is
readable at least - that's one of the features I have tested --> using
Texlib without CSS.

Rene
--
Rene Schwietzke
r.schwietzke<at>reneschwietzke.de
http://www.rene-schwietzke.de/

Post a reply to this message

The copyright issue makes me afraid to use your site.

Do we have a community for those who hope to profit from their contribution
to a pile of software,  or a community for those who want to retain the
spirit of freeware?  Am I being too anal in seeing red in the fussiness with
copyrights?

Are the copyrights essentially:
i)  defensive: to prevent a third party from claiming exclusive rights and
thus preventing these authors from making a profit on their own work?
--or--
ii) offensive:  Use is free unless you make commerical use of my pigment.
In this case notify me and we'll discuss.  These folks stand on the shoulder
of giants in using povray but then want a dime for the lift they give the
next bloke.


I have no valid hope of ever making money on this hobby, but I can dream,
and if I create something I don't want to have to fret over what has this
copyright tripwire on it.  If I texture a trashcan in a corner of a scene,
and five years from now reuse the code in a TV commercial, will I get sued?

I would much rather  just use ****freeware****   and contribute to the
freeware community as I am able.



"Rene Schwietzke" <ren### [at] reneschwietzkede> wrote in message
news:3e188316$1@news.povray.org...
> Greg M. Johnson wrote:
> > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> > :-|
> >
> >
> I am not a native speaker, I do not get your point. Please help me!
>
> Rene
>

Post a reply to this message

"Rene Schwietzke" <ren### [at] reneschwietzkede> wrote
> Please accept my apologies for not supporting Netscape 4. Any reasons for
> using it?

The problem is *much* worse than that. I have downloaded your entire library
with GNU wget (34,175,505 bytes total), and my offline version of your
library looks like complete crap in IE6 (and yes, I do have good reasons of
using both wget and IE6).

Other than that, your library is great and seems to be quite useful... many
thanks for the hard work. The only request: if only possible, please try to
make its internal (page) design a bit simpler; it seems like many people
would benefit from that.

Thanks,
Vadim.

P.S. Your robots.txt reads:

  User-agent: *
  Disallow:

That is, there are currently no restrictions as to doing what I did.

Post a reply to this message

Hi,

> robots.txt
I wanna give robots permission to index the library.

>The problem is *much* worse than that. I have downloaded your entire
library
>with GNU wget (34,175,505 bytes total), and my offline version of your
>library looks like complete crap in IE6 (and yes, I do have good reasons of
>using both wget and IE6).
If you download the entire website you should be able to browse it offline
because that's the way I develop the library, offline. Texlib currently uses
the CSS file of the main website because I have not decoupled the library
from the rest of the website yet, but it will be my next step because
everyone asks for a downloadable version.

I will do my best to fix all these issues during this week and upload a new
version at the weekend.

Thanks for the comments,
Rene
--
Rene Schwietzke
r.schwietzke<at>reneschwietzke.de
http://www.rene-schwietzke.de/

Post a reply to this message

"Greg M. Johnson" <gregj:-)565### [at] aolcom> wrote in message
news:3e19abd6$1@news.povray.org...
> The copyright issue makes me afraid to use your site.
>
> Do we have a community for those who hope to profit from their
contribution
> to a pile of software,  or a community for those who want to retain the
> spirit of freeware?  Am I being too anal in seeing red in the fussiness
with
> copyrights?
>
Hi Greg,

you are right. Recently I had trouble with a lawyer because of my old
website, therefore I try to be as careful as possible. I might have
exaggerated it. I am sorry.

How about this:
1. I will only include textures in the library which are freely useable for
any purpose except reselling the texture itself.
2. Modification are allowed and the derived texture is also freely usable
and distributable if the inital author is credited - except reselling it.
3. Reselling a texture (not(!) the images made with it) is only permitted if
the author has been asked before - except for the original textures of
POV-Ray of course.

Does this sound better?

Thanks,
Rene
--
Rene Schwietzke
r.schwietzke<at>reneschwietzke.de
http://www.rene-schwietzke.de/

Post a reply to this message

news: 3e1a8cea@news.povray.org...
> you are right. Recently I had trouble with a lawyer because of my old
> website, therefore I try to be as careful as possible. I might have
> exaggerated it. I am sorry.

No need to be sorry. It may well be the case that some people willing to
provide textures would ask for this possibility. Actually there's a growing
trend for free content providers to put extra requirements about their
stuff. The "non-commercial use" clause is the most common, but some really
weird demands have appeared lately, like people who do not want their free
prop being used in "violent" or "satanic" scenes... There seems to be no
limit there. Next time I release props, I'll make sure to put a clause in
the license asking people to do the chicken dance first and send the video
to me :-)
On one hand, I don't quite understand this sort of demands (not to mention
that they are hardly enforceable). On the other hand, people are obviously
free to write their own EULA and put in whatever they want. But do we want
to encourage that ?
In regards to POV-Ray related material, I think that the rule of thumb
should be that the EULA for a freebie should not be harsher than POV-Ray's
own and prohibit only potential abuses (like reselling or stealing/hiding
the copyright), so the modification you propose seems right to me.

G.

--

**********************
http://www.oyonale.com
**********************
- Graphic experiments
- POV-Ray and Poser computer images
- Posters

Post a reply to this message

"Rene Schwietzke" <ren### [at] reneschwietzkede> wrote
> I will do my best to fix all these issues during this week and upload a
new
> version at the weekend.

Thank you, looking foeward to it.

Post a reply to this message