 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp <war### [at] tag povrayorg> wrote:
> Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
> > UNIX has rsync. Windows has the backup and restore tool. MacOS has time
> > machine. Which one is the problem?
>
> Time Machine is the only one that's actually easy to use and fully
> automatic, and has a good file browser for backed files...
>
> --
> - Warp
I've been using Acronis True Image for Windows for a few years now.
I haven't heard anything good about the later versions, but the one I use works
more or less. I used and still use it on 2k, XP and W7.
It just sometimes coughs on a backup job if it runa it directly after resume
from standby or hibernate, so I have to restart it manually.
You can do backups of folders or partitions via the live CD, you can restore
individual folders from a partition backup, or you just mount an image as read
only and browse it.
I set to to automatically make a new differential backup of my system drive
every week and I create a new backup job quarterly.
That said, I have 4 HDDs in my system:
- 60GB SSD as system drive
- 2TB for PVR data and
- 2TB for other stuff and data
- 1TB for backups and my VMs
Regards
Aydan
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Le 25/04/2012 14:15, Warp nous fit lire :
> Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
>> UNIX has rsync. Windows has the backup and restore tool. MacOS has time
>> machine. Which one is the problem?
>
> Time Machine is the only one that's actually easy to use and fully
> automatic, and has a good file browser for backed files...
>
Unix rsync is just fine, using an external usb drive.
It can be interrupted & restarted, it does not copy again files already
copied (default: check timestamp & size; checksum can be also used), and
you can browse with usual program the copy.
Many option also to handle cumulative backup.
My simple copy is : rsync -av /original/location/ /media/storage/usbdisk
No need to compress for a local transfer, and I often do not feel the
need for a checksum (but adding -c can be useful)
When rsync is not available, but ftp is, the clear winner is lftp.
But you have to be very careful about its tunning: a mirroring in the
wrong direction might quickly deletes a waste amount of data.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 4/25/2012 6:51, andrel wrote:
> There is a copy of the registry somewhere. So you can reinstall that even if
> the current one is corruct.
Yep. Windows has been making a second copy of the registry on boot since 3.1
days (or maybe 95 days). I remember seeing someone get the message "your
registry is corrupt. Please reboot" and having it use the backup copy, back
before Windows had logins. :-)
> At least my brother has done that for me once and apparently regularly doing
> it for other people as well.
Yep. But honestly, I'm not sure what you need to rescue from the registry.
None of your data files should be in your registry.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
"Oh no! We're out of code juice!"
"Don't panic. There's beans and filters
in the cabinet."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 4/25/2012 5:15, Warp wrote:
> Darren New<dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
>> UNIX has rsync. Windows has the backup and restore tool. MacOS has time
>> machine. Which one is the problem?
>
> Time Machine is the only one that's actually easy to use and fully
> automatic, and has a good file browser for backed files...
I disagree. Win7 backup is completely trivial as well.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
"Oh no! We're out of code juice!"
"Don't panic. There's beans and filters
in the cabinet."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 26-4-2012 5:38, Darren New wrote:
> On 4/25/2012 6:51, andrel wrote:
>> There is a copy of the registry somewhere. So you can reinstall that
>> even if
>> the current one is corruct.
>
> Yep. Windows has been making a second copy of the registry on boot since
> 3.1 days (or maybe 95 days). I remember seeing someone get the message
> "your registry is corrupt. Please reboot" and having it use the backup
> copy, back before Windows had logins. :-)
You might be right (no reason to doubt that), but after a crash and a
reinstall of windows people tend to write off all programs, and will
reinstall everything from scratch. Even people that should know better.
>> At least my brother has done that for me once and apparently regularly
>> doing
>> it for other people as well.
>
> Yep. But honestly, I'm not sure what you need to rescue from the
> registry. None of your data files should be in your registry.
No, but if the programs refuse to run, you can still not access your data.
--
tip: do not run in an unknown place when it is too dark to see the
floor, unless you prefer to not use uppercase.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 4/26/2012 1:32, andrel wrote:
> You might be right (no reason to doubt that), but after a crash and a
> reinstall of windows people tend to write off all programs, and will
> reinstall everything from scratch. Even people that should know better.
Well, yes. There's little point to keeping the registry around if you're
going to reinstall programs.
>> Yep. But honestly, I'm not sure what you need to rescue from the
>> registry. None of your data files should be in your registry.
>
> No, but if the programs refuse to run, you can still not access your data.
For what program can you not back up the data separately from the program?
That sounds rather silly.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
"Oh no! We're out of code juice!"
"Don't panic. There's beans and filters
in the cabinet."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 4/27/2012 5:36 PM, Darren New wrote:
> On 4/26/2012 1:32, andrel wrote:
>> You might be right (no reason to doubt that), but after a crash and a
>> reinstall of windows people tend to write off all programs, and will
>> reinstall everything from scratch. Even people that should know better.
>
> Well, yes. There's little point to keeping the registry around if you're
> going to reinstall programs.
>
>>> Yep. But honestly, I'm not sure what you need to rescue from the
>>> registry. None of your data files should be in your registry.
>>
>> No, but if the programs refuse to run, you can still not access your
>> data.
>
> For what program can you not back up the data separately from the
> program? That sounds rather silly.
>
Registration keys. You know, those things on the backs of manuals, or CD
cases, or which you are supposed to be able to get from the people you
bought the product from, unless its a few years old, or they got bought
up by someone else. That is the sort of thing that gets lost when you
lose the registry.
And, yeah, there is a copy on the drive, but you can't read it. Windows
compresses it, or something, unless you specify otherwise, some place.
The tools to unpack it either don't exist, are not bothered with, etc.
Got a fair number of games that flat won't run without those keys, and
not all of them are recoverable from the sites they originally got
registered to. All of which makes things a massive pain in the ass.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 4/24/2012 10:30 PM, Darren New wrote:
>> there was never any practical way to do a complete backup.
>
> If you buy a USB drive, it's pretty trivial. You might have to cough up
> $100 for one tho.
>
> Tell me what system you have, and I'll tell you how to do it. I never
> work on a system I haven't already backed up, wiped, and restored at
> least once.
>
Yeah, have an external USB drive, which I got due to running out of
space on the other two drives. Its just one of those things.. 1) its the
same sort of media, to similarly volatile, 2) unless it stays connected,
and automatic backups happen, its not a certain solution, 3) if you do
keep in connected, to do that, then some of the stuff that can kill the
main drive *will* also kill the backup (like power surges).
Practical to me means that at least 2 out of the 3 problem above are
removed from the list of risks (with the, "it dies if the machine does",
being one of the two in any case).
There are a lot of poor backup solutions, and many of them come with
idiot problems, like the OS whining about not letting you copy certain
files, to back them up, which make full restoration a problem, even
without the other issues above.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Note, once I do have things where I need them, and junk stuff removed, I
will probably use the external 1TB drive I already got to do backups,
presuming I can get the backup software to do a decent job. Some where
between Onetouch 3 and Onetouch 4, they completely screwed the software
that drive came with, so that it refused to update files in certain
folders, at all, and restricted what you could backup to specific types.
Needless to say, since I don't run a damn office, I found the idea that
it would backup .xls files, but not say .pov, for example, to be
complete idiocy.
I doubt Windows 7's new backup thing is that stupid, but since I never
got a version of it to work on prior machines (bloody XP version thought
"floppies" where the way to do things, and didn't know what to do with
the CD drive, never mind a DVD drive...), I am not going to assume that
it will work perfectly. lol
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 4/28/2012 4:05, Patrick Elliott wrote:
> Got a fair number of games that flat won't run without those keys, and not
> all of them are recoverable from the sites they originally got registered
> to. All of which makes things a massive pain in the ass.
Fair enough. I'd count that as installation materials, which you'd need to
have to reinstall. Of course, the worst are when you get such a key, and it
dials out to their server to verify it, and their server is toast after a
few years. I've had a couple like that.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
"Oh no! We're out of code juice!"
"Don't panic. There's beans and filters
in the cabinet."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
