POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.off-topic : Data transfer Server Time
31 Jul 2024 02:28:54 EDT (-0400)
  Data transfer (Message 171 to 180 of 195)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>
From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Data transfer
Date: 16 Sep 2011 14:10:37
Message: <4e73911d$1@news.povray.org>
On 16/09/2011 6:17 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>
>>> On 16/09/2011 5:57 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>> Training that could actually resolve some of those security issues by
>>>> having competent staff.
>>>
>>> You're asking a lot there, Jim. ;-)
>>
>> Indeed, I am - but things could get interesting here job-wise, as I've
>> found a job where I might actually have to solve that one. :)
>
> (Not as in "been given an offer for", rather I found a posting that I'm
> applying for)
>

Good luck with that one. I hope that you can deliver on time and in 
budget ;-)


-- 
Regards
     Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: Darren New
Subject: Re: Data transfer
Date: 16 Sep 2011 15:00:29
Message: <4e739ccd$1@news.povray.org>
On 9/16/2011 10:15, Jim Henderson wrote:
>  not the same as "running a Linux server" in my book.

I agree. That's precisely my point.  Saying "you never have to reboot a 
Linux machine except for kernel upgrades" is incorrect. It assumes the box 
has all the tools it needs to manage it without rebooting, and it assumes 
your software environment isn't hardened against you manipulating it in the 
ways described.

> That doesn't mean a reboot is *necessary*, which is what we were
> discussing.

OK, so how do you upgrade your PRL without rebooting your phone? My point is 
that claiming "you don't have to" assumes a whole bunch of facts that 
aren't true just because you're running Linux.

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   How come I never get only one kudo?


Post a reply to this message

From: Jim Henderson
Subject: Re: Data transfer
Date: 16 Sep 2011 15:57:59
Message: <4e73aa47$1@news.povray.org>
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:00:28 -0700, Darren New wrote:

> On 9/16/2011 10:15, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>  not the same as "running a Linux server" in my book.
> 
> I agree. That's precisely my point.  Saying "you never have to reboot a
> Linux machine except for kernel upgrades" is incorrect. It assumes the
> box has all the tools it needs to manage it without rebooting, and it
> assumes your software environment isn't hardened against you
> manipulating it in the ways described.

You specified servers and desktops - not appliance devices.

I also never said "you never have to reboot a Linux machine except for 
kernel updates".  I said "you usually never have to reboot a Linux 
machine except for kernel updates".  There's a world of difference in 
those two statements.

I also very specifically stated that if you're dealing with zombie 
processes, a Linux system *requires* a reboot to the best of my knowledge.

>> That doesn't mean a reboot is *necessary*, which is what we were
>> discussing.
> 
> OK, so how do you upgrade your PRL without rebooting your phone? My
> point is that claiming "you don't have to" assumes a whole bunch of
> facts that aren't true just because you're running Linux.

I've never had a need to, so I don't know.  Presumably you could stop a 
service or unload/reload a driver, or drop to single user mode and then 
go back to the default runlevel.

Jim


Post a reply to this message

From: Jim Henderson
Subject: Re: Data transfer
Date: 16 Sep 2011 15:58:56
Message: <4e73aa80$1@news.povray.org>
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 19:10:30 +0100, Stephen wrote:

> On 16/09/2011 6:17 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 16/09/2011 5:57 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>>> Training that could actually resolve some of those security issues
>>>>> by having competent staff.
>>>>
>>>> You're asking a lot there, Jim. ;-)
>>>
>>> Indeed, I am - but things could get interesting here job-wise, as I've
>>> found a job where I might actually have to solve that one. :)
>>
>> (Not as in "been given an offer for", rather I found a posting that I'm
>> applying for)
>>
>>
> Good luck with that one. I hope that you can deliver on time and in
> budget ;-)

A little late on the "on time" bit (I had wanted to be back to work about 
2 months ago - but only in a position that was right for me), but yeah, I 
think this could work out well once I get the resume into the right 
person's hands.  The trick is making sure it gets to the right person 
rather than going through "the front door".

Jim


Post a reply to this message

From: Darren New
Subject: Re: Data transfer
Date: 16 Sep 2011 16:22:56
Message: <4e73b020$1@news.povray.org>
On 9/16/2011 12:57, Jim Henderson wrote:
> You specified servers and desktops - not appliance devices.

No I didn't.  I was responding to someone else's comment of

 >> Heathen! Linux machines do not need to be rebooted. Ever.

That didn't say "Linux machines with a full development environment 
installed and to which you have root access never have to be rebooted." 
That's my point here. :-)

> I've never had a need to, so I don't know.  Presumably you could stop a
> service or unload/reload a driver, or drop to single user mode and then
> go back to the default runlevel.

Cool. How do I drop to single-user mode on my cell phone?

Again, you're making assumptions that the linux in your phone (or your cable 
box or your credit card terminal) is like the linux in your desktop or 
server machine.

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   How come I never get only one kudo?


Post a reply to this message

From: clipka
Subject: Re: Data transfer
Date: 16 Sep 2011 16:45:32
Message: <4e73b56c$1@news.povray.org>
Am 16.09.2011 19:14, schrieb Francois Labreque:
> Le 2011-09-15 22:10, Darren New a écrit :
>> On 9/15/2011 18:19, Francois Labreque wrote:
>>> Heathen! Linux machines do not need to be rebooted. Ever.
>>
>> I'm pretty sure you're wrong on that one.
>>
> A previous version of that post had a smiley at the end. I guess it got
> lost during the vetting process.

Id didn't get lost - it just hid between the lines. I swear I can hear 
it chuckling.


Post a reply to this message

From: Jim Henderson
Subject: Re: Data transfer
Date: 17 Sep 2011 00:36:38
Message: <4e7423d6$1@news.povray.org>
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 13:22:55 -0700, Darren New wrote:

> On 9/16/2011 12:57, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> You specified servers and desktops - not appliance devices.
> 
> No I didn't.  I was responding to someone else's comment of
> 
>  >> Heathen! Linux machines do not need to be rebooted. Ever.
> 
> That didn't say "Linux machines with a full development environment
> installed and to which you have root access never have to be rebooted."
> That's my point here. :-)

That's fair.  You wrote your reply to a message I wrote, so clearly I 
thought you were responding to what I said.

>> I've never had a need to, so I don't know.  Presumably you could stop a
>> service or unload/reload a driver, or drop to single user mode and then
>> go back to the default runlevel.
> 
> Cool. How do I drop to single-user mode on my cell phone?

Probably depends on the phone.  Like I said, I've never needed to find 
out, so I don't know.

> Again, you're making assumptions that the linux in your phone (or your
> cable box or your credit card terminal) is like the linux in your
> desktop or server machine.

Linux is a kernel.  I'm not making assumptions about the kernel.

Jim


Post a reply to this message

From: Darren New
Subject: Re: Data transfer
Date: 17 Sep 2011 01:37:02
Message: <4e7431fe$1@news.povray.org>
On 9/16/2011 21:36, Jim Henderson wrote:
> That's fair.  You wrote your reply to a message I wrote, so clearly I
> thought you were responding to what I said.

I still never specified servers at all, and I only mentioned desktops in a 
disclaimer. :-)

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   How come I never get only one kudo?


Post a reply to this message

From: Darren New
Subject: Re: Data transfer
Date: 17 Sep 2011 10:13:30
Message: <4e74ab0a$1@news.povray.org>
On 9/16/2011 21:36, Jim Henderson wrote:
 > Linux is a kernel.  I'm not making assumptions about the kernel.

Incidentally, in the real world, nobody cares about the kernel. If you have 
10,000 airline agents hitting your database from all around the world, and 
your database server takes 10 minutes to restart and recache its indexes 
after you upgrade the code, nobody really cares if the kernel survived the 
upgrade or not. :-)  That's what always amuses me about such discussions.

Indeed, people don't really even care if it was the database down or the 
router provided by your ISP.  A backhoe outside your door is going to screw 
up your uptime stats as much as a kernel upgrade will.

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   How come I never get only one kudo?


Post a reply to this message

From: Jim Henderson
Subject: Re: Data transfer
Date: 17 Sep 2011 13:31:09
Message: <4e74d95d$1@news.povray.org>
On Sat, 17 Sep 2011 07:13:26 -0700, Darren New wrote:

> On 9/16/2011 21:36, Jim Henderson wrote:
>  > Linux is a kernel.  I'm not making assumptions about the kernel.
> 
> Incidentally, in the real world, nobody cares about the kernel. If you
> have 10,000 airline agents hitting your database from all around the
> world, and your database server takes 10 minutes to restart and recache
> its indexes after you upgrade the code, nobody really cares if the
> kernel survived the upgrade or not. :-)  That's what always amuses me
> about such discussions.

Certainly - and the question of whether it has to be rebooted or not is 
somewhat mooted by that point.  I can get a lot of things to restart 
properly by just going to single user mode and back to runlevel 3 or 5, 
but if services are offline, that's still downtime.

Server uptime isn't a great measure of availability.  Service uptime is 
more meaningful.

Just like the neverending debate about which Linux desktop environment is 
the "best".  I've used pretty much all of them, and have come to the 
conclusion that the DE is pretty irrelevant - if I am using a computer, 
I'm using it for the apps, not the DE.  If I'm focused on the DE so much 
that I "hate" KDE or GNOME or LXDE or whatever - then I'm obviously not 
using the computer as a tool to get actual work done.

> Indeed, people don't really even care if it was the database down or the
> router provided by your ISP.  A backhoe outside your door is going to
> screw up your uptime stats as much as a kernel upgrade will.

Absolutely.

Jim


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.