 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 25/01/14 15:04, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> <snip> The
> tuit is very eroded but on the reverse side there are still some very
> faint marks that resemble writing of some sort. I seem to recognize a
> 'S' rune. Do you think this could be one of Stephen's originals?
OMG. If it is, its value is inestimable. Of course, only Stephen could
confirm its provenance but, sadly, his mind has been warped by years of
playing with ray-tracing software. :-D
John
--
Protect the Earth
It was not given to you by your parents
You hold it in trust for your children
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 25-1-2014 17:55, Doctor John wrote:
> OMG. If it is, its value is inestimable. Of course, only Stephen could
> confirm its provenance but, sadly, his mind has been warped by years of
> playing with ray-tracing software. :-D
Sad. Sad. I always warn people around me to avoid (repeat: avoid!)
ray-tracing. Its pernicious effects are even worse than uisge beatha :-o
Which brings be back to that marvellous Stanford bunny which looks very
very good. With all the round tuits I have got I should be able now to
experiment with sslt too... when I have finished, that is, playing with
silly booted, naked men ;-)
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 26/01/2014 8:11 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> On 25-1-2014 17:55, Doctor John wrote:
>> OMG. If it is, its value is inestimable. Of course, only Stephen could
>> confirm its provenance but, sadly, his mind has been warped by years of
>> playing with ray-tracing software. :-D
>
> Sad. Sad. I always warn people around me to avoid (repeat: avoid!)
> ray-tracing. Its pernicious effects are even worse than uisge beatha :-o
>
> Which brings be back to that marvellous Stanford bunny which looks very
> very good. With all the round tuits I have got I should be able now to
> experiment with sslt too... when I have finished, that is, playing with
> silly booted, naked men ;-)
>
While you two sweety wives have been hanging over the garden fence
gossiping. I've been grafting. :-P
I made this in Blender and except for the cylinder it is all text. I
tried to use a Keltic font for the writing but the mesh sizes were
horrendous.
Note the artefact at the horizon on the reverse? A weeks supply of
genuine ancient almost round Tuits for the first correct solution.
Hurry before supply outstrips demand!
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'tuit_0.png' (167 KB)
Preview of image 'tuit_0.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 26-1-2014 11:16, Stephen wrote:
> While you two sweety wives have been hanging over the garden fence
> gossiping. I've been grafting. :-P
You were free to join us, love :-)
>
> I made this in Blender and except for the cylinder it is all text. I
> tried to use a Keltic font for the writing but the mesh sizes were
> horrendous.
Maybe with an image_map text and then extruded as height_field?
>
> Note the artefact at the horizon on the reverse? A weeks supply of
> genuine ancient almost round Tuits for the first correct solution.
> Hurry before supply outstrips demand!
Now that seems to be reflection on the reverse side, no? You can see
that also lower down, where the checkered plane is reflected.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 26/01/2014 12:23 PM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> On 26-1-2014 11:16, Stephen wrote:
>> While you two sweety wives have been hanging over the garden fence
>> gossiping. I've been grafting. :-P
>
> You were free to join us, love :-)
>
Too busy, too busy. <Looks at watch and pops down the hole.>
>>
>> I made this in Blender and except for the cylinder it is all text. I
>> tried to use a Keltic font for the writing but the mesh sizes were
>> horrendous.
>
> Maybe with an image_map text and then extruded as height_field?
>
Of course, doing it in Pov would have been much easier. But for a while
I am going to do everything in Blender then render it in PovRay. I am
having to develop a different mind set.
>>
>> Note the artefact at the horizon on the reverse? A weeks supply of
>> genuine ancient almost round Tuits for the first correct solution.
>> Hurry before supply outstrips demand!
>
> Now that seems to be reflection on the reverse side, no? You can see
> that also lower down, where the checkered plane is reflected.
>
I can't put much past you. I was using an old Moray material and it had
too high a value for reflection. Because it was at the horizon I thought
that it looked like the artefact a SOR gives if you don't use sturm.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 26-1-2014 13:40, Stephen wrote:
> Of course, doing it in Pov would have been much easier. But for a while
> I am going to do everything in Blender then render it in PovRay. I am
> having to develop a different mind set.
That's a good idea indeed. One thing that Silo cannot do (basically that
is) is text. I have to import it from outside.
> I can't put much past you. I was using an old Moray material and it had
> too high a value for reflection. Because it was at the horizon I thought
> that it looked like the artefact a SOR gives if you don't use sturm.
The horizon fooled me for a second, until I saw the reflections lower
down. Which reminds me that I have not used Moray for ages; I have not
even it installed on my present pc. I am waiting for its future avatar
under pov 3.7 or later. Will take a while I am sure.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 25/01/2014 12:42 PM, Doctor John wrote:
> Stephen, back in the neolithic era,
And what does that say about you?
BTW Have you read Alfred Bester's Extro aka The Computer Connection?
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 25/01/2014 3:04 PM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> I seem to recognize a 'S' rune. Do you think this could be one of
> Stephen's originals?
It might be. I was too busy with the little golden ones and the long
green ones to remember.
A bit like the 60's and 70's.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 26/01/2014 3:06 PM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> On 26-1-2014 13:40, Stephen wrote:
>> Of course, doing it in Pov would have been much easier. But for a while
>> I am going to do everything in Blender then render it in PovRay. I am
>> having to develop a different mind set.
>
> That's a good idea indeed. One thing that Silo cannot do (basically that
> is) is text. I have to import it from outside.
>
I seldom use 3D Text. Blender lets you use a basic text editor and
upload a file. I was going to difference the text from the base material
but my laptop fell over laughing. But then it is old and needs a
re-install and I am lazy.
> The horizon fooled me for a second, until I saw the reflections lower
> down. Which reminds me that I have not used Moray for ages; I have not
> even it installed on my present pc.
It is on mine but I've not used it in years.
> I am waiting for its future avatar
> under pov 3.7 or later. Will take a while I am sure.
>
Was it not supposed to be after Pov 4.0?
That is why I am learning Blender. I need something to visualise scenes.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 26/01/14 16:31, Stephen wrote:
> On 25/01/2014 12:42 PM, Doctor John wrote:
>> Stephen, back in the neolithic era,
>
> And what does that say about you?
>
> BTW Have you read Alfred Bester's Extro aka The Computer Connection?
>
>
Umm, no. But I shall look out for it. A recommendation from you about
books is equal to a recommendation from Giles Coren about restaurants.
John
--
Protect the Earth
It was not given to you by your parents
You hold it in trust for your children
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
