 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
hey Spider..I think you've criticized enough of everyone's pictures
here...instead of telling us the bad things about the pics, why not the good
things?
_
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Also I have to complain about ken..who ever he is and his butt buddy here
spider think they are...they have no right to complain about such stupid and
small details and errors. Like for example!
A few posts down "CD-ROMs attempt at photo realism"
ken said and I quote!
"That's a nice set of table coaster you have there (don't try to figure
it out it's an inside joke around here). Seriously this is one of the
better attempts on this theme I have seen to date. It is evident you
put considerable effort into it and it has paid off. Be careful with
the use of the work photo realism. Do you want it to look like a photo,
or do you want it to look like a real life view of this object in this
setting, fooling the viewer that it was indeed really there ??"
Now its a positive statement..but he has to add something negative! like
below where he gets upset about something so stupid and small...the use of
the word photorealism in this mans subject!
KEN: "I disliket he term photo realism for the above stated argument.
It
seems contrary to the intent of the artist to mimic reality in a
virtual medium."
I mean come on! shut up! i dont ever see you or spider posting your
pictures! im sure you could do a kick ass ob but come on man!
_
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Generally most people do comment by saying what they like and what they
don't like. This is called feedback. I don't hear anyone who posts their
images complaining about your so-called harshness of criticism. In fact,
most are grateful for the criticism, as, that's how we get better.
And at least, when they criticize, they post their name, because they stand
behind what they say rather than hiding behind their words so they can be
more harsh and condescending.
Now, if your primitive intellect can do this, why not sort your messages by
sender, and look at the scores of pics sent by Ken and Spider.
I do not think you will change anyone's mind here about Ken or Spider.
Those lurkers out there who find Ken uppity, or Spider condescending, we
haven't heard from them, and I think that if you, whoever you are, do find
their comments so, you should bring it up in a polite manner rather than
being condescending and harsh yourself! Comprende?
Anyhow. Bye bye now you poor craven soul.
--
Mike Metheny
lon### [at] vt edu
mik### [at] loneshepherdcom
http://www.loneshepherd.com/
"When one's words are no better than silence, one should keep silent."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
It is understood that when one requests comments, they request both
positive AND negative comments. If you only got positive comments, you
would never get better at what you do. You pick on Ken and Spider
merely because they post often and spend a lot of time and effort to
reply to pretty much every post that is made. Please take your immature
flame war elsewhere.
Steve
_ wrote:
>
> Also I have to complain about ken..who ever he is and his butt buddy here
> spider think they are...they have no right to complain about such stupid and
> small details and errors. Like for example!
>
> A few posts down "CD-ROMs attempt at photo realism"
> ken said and I quote!
>
> "That's a nice set of table coaster you have there (don't try to figure
> it out it's an inside joke around here). Seriously this is one of the
> better attempts on this theme I have seen to date. It is evident you
> put considerable effort into it and it has paid off. Be careful with
> the use of the work photo realism. Do you want it to look like a photo,
> or do you want it to look like a real life view of this object in this
> setting, fooling the viewer that it was indeed really there ??"
> Now its a positive statement..but he has to add something negative! like
> below where he gets upset about something so stupid and small...the use of
> the word photorealism in this mans subject!
>
> KEN: "I disliket he term photo realism for the above stated argument.
> It
> seems contrary to the intent of the artist to mimic reality in a
> virtual medium."
>
> I mean come on! shut up! i dont ever see you or spider posting your
> pictures! im sure you could do a kick ass ob but come on man!
>
> _
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
When you have the courage to identify yourself, maybe you'll generate some
useful discussion.
--
Jim
Check out my web site http://www.kressworks.com/
It'll blow your mind (politically), stimulate your senses (artistically)
and provide scientific insights beyond compare!
Be sure to read the Warp maintained POV VFAQ:
http://iki.fi/warp/povVFAQ.html
_ <_@_.com> wrote in message <3727b9b3.0@news.povray.org>...
>hey Spider..I think you've criticized enough of everyone's pictures
>here...instead of telling us the bad things about the pics, why not the
good
>things?
>
>_
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
qe-whiz, _, that's one of the his tamest posts en critique I have ever
seen, thanks for reposting it, I would have missed it otherwise...
sheesh, and to think I thought Ken was a curmudgeon... :o(
_ wrote:
<snip _'s post of ken's rather lavish praise>
--
Stuff for POLYRAY, raytraced images,
and DTA can be found at:
http://www.sapere.com/dearmad
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hmmm. I wonder who _ could be? Note the nntp-host please.
Reply-To: "_" <_@_.com>
From: "_" <_@_.com>
Newsgroups: povray.binaries.images
Subject: Shut up Spider
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 21:44:38 -0400
Lines: 7
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.0.254.216
Message-ID: <3727b9b3.0@news.povray.org>
--------------------------------------------------
now watch me pull a rabbit out of the news archives:
Reply-To: "Nicholas DePetrillo" <N1h### [at] hotmailcom>
From: "Nicholas DePetrillo" <N1h### [at] hotmailcom>
Newsgroups: povray.binaries.images
Subject: AWSOME ROLEX WATCH!
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 23:02:38 -0400
Lines: 1177
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.0.254.216
A note to the kids out there, the internet isn't as anonymous as you may
think.
Another note, you don't have to pretend to be a genius at POV to be
accepted here - the few months I've spent in here have dramatically
improved my pictures, and I've never seen anyone told that they suck for
anything they've done while learning to use POV.
scott.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
_ wrote:
>
> Also I have to complain about ken..who ever he is and his butt buddy here
> spider think they are...they have no right to complain about such stupid and
> small details and errors. Like for example!
Thank you very much. I accept the honor you bestow upon me and
appreciate the compliments. It is nice to be recognized for the
effort I make around here to help others. Your tone is a little
odd but I won't let it take away from the underlying compliments
you are paying me.
Again thank you.
--
Ken Tyler
mailto://tylereng@pacbell.net
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I did wonder about that. Unfortunately Netscape makes it more difficult
than normal to grab the full header from a message. I figured someone
with a real newsreader (please note, I have no objections to Netscapes
newsreader, and hence I use it) would pick up the header info and figure
it out if it were the case.
Steve
Scott McDonald wrote:
>
> Hmmm. I wonder who _ could be? Note the nntp-host please.
>
> Reply-To: "_" <_@_.com>
> From: "_" <_@_.com>
> Newsgroups: povray.binaries.images
> Subject: Shut up Spider
> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 21:44:38 -0400
> Lines: 7
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.0.254.216
> Message-ID: <3727b9b3.0@news.povray.org>
> --------------------------------------------------
> now watch me pull a rabbit out of the news archives:
>
> Reply-To: "Nicholas DePetrillo" <N1h### [at] hotmailcom>
> From: "Nicholas DePetrillo" <N1h### [at] hotmailcom>
> Newsgroups: povray.binaries.images
> Subject: AWSOME ROLEX WATCH!
> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 23:02:38 -0400
> Lines: 1177
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.0.254.216
>
> A note to the kids out there, the internet isn't as anonymous as you may
> think.
>
> Another note, you don't have to pretend to be a genius at POV to be
> accepted here - the few months I've spent in here have dramatically
> improved my pictures, and I've never seen anyone told that they suck for
> anything they've done while learning to use POV.
>
> scott.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thanks Scott! Now we have a name to associate with the anal orifice ...
--
Jim
Check out my web site http://www.kressworks.com/
It'll blow your mind (politically), stimulate your senses (artistically)
and provide scientific insights beyond compare!
Be sure to read the Warp maintained POV VFAQ:
http://iki.fi/warp/povVFAQ.html
Scott McDonald wrote in message <3727D462.E57B8DF9@metrolink.com>...
>Hmmm. I wonder who _ could be? Note the nntp-host please.
>
>Reply-To: "_" <_@_.com>
>From: "_" <_@_.com>
>Newsgroups: povray.binaries.images
>Subject: Shut up Spider
>Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 21:44:38 -0400
>Lines: 7
>X-Priority: 3
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
>NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.0.254.216
>Message-ID: <3727b9b3.0@news.povray.org>
>--------------------------------------------------
>now watch me pull a rabbit out of the news archives:
>
>Reply-To: "Nicholas DePetrillo" <N1h### [at] hotmailcom>
>From: "Nicholas DePetrillo" <N1h### [at] hotmailcom>
>Newsgroups: povray.binaries.images
>Subject: AWSOME ROLEX WATCH!
>Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 23:02:38 -0400
>Lines: 1177
>X-Priority: 3
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
>NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.0.254.216
>
>A note to the kids out there, the internet isn't as anonymous as you may
>think.
>
>Another note, you don't have to pretend to be a genius at POV to be
>accepted here - the few months I've spent in here have dramatically
>improved my pictures, and I've never seen anyone told that they suck for
>anything they've done while learning to use POV.
>
>
>scott.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
