It is understood that when one requests comments, they request both
positive AND negative comments.  If you only got positive comments, you
would never get better at what you do.  You pick on Ken and Spider
merely because they post often and spend a lot of time and effort to
reply to pretty much every post that is made.  Please take your immature
flame war elsewhere.

Steve

_ wrote:
> 
> Also I have to complain about ken..who ever he is and his butt buddy here
> spider think they are...they have no right to complain about such stupid and
> small details and errors. Like for example!
> 
> A few posts down "CD-ROMs attempt at photo realism"
> ken said and I quote!
> 
> "That's a nice set of table coaster you have there (don't try to figure
> it out it's an inside joke around here). Seriously this is one of the
> better attempts on this theme I have seen to date. It is evident you
> put considerable effort into it and it has paid off. Be careful with
> the use of the work photo realism. Do you want it to look like a photo,
> or do you want it to look like a real life view of this object in this
> setting, fooling the viewer that it was indeed really there ??"
> Now its a positive statement..but he has to add something negative! like
> below where he gets upset about something so stupid and small...the use of
> the word photorealism in this mans subject!
> 
>    KEN:    "I disliket he term photo realism for the above stated argument.
> It
> seems contrary to the intent of the artist to mimic reality in a
> virtual medium."
> 
> I mean come on! shut up! i dont ever see you or spider posting your
> pictures! im sure you could do a kick ass ob but come on man!
> 
> _

Post a reply to this message