 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 6/4/2017 7:36 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>>
>>> This latest series of images would be a good basis for a weird
>>> animation.
>>>
>>
>> I don't know about weird but a neat animation certainly. :-)
>>
>>
>
> My 'weird' refers to the content of course ;-) Semantics? Semantics!
Yes, semantics.
To me weird relates to the supernatural not just being very strange or
bizarre.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 4-6-2017 11:56, Stephen wrote:
> On 6/4/2017 7:36 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>>>
>>>> This latest series of images would be a good basis for a weird
>>>> animation.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I don't know about weird but a neat animation certainly. :-)
>>>
>>>
>>
>> My 'weird' refers to the content of course ;-) Semantics? Semantics!
>
>
> Yes, semantics.
> To me weird relates to the supernatural not just being very strange or
> bizarre.
>
>
>
You are right. I have used it in the (informal) sense, according to the
Oxford Dictionary.
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 6/4/2017 12:09 PM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> On 4-6-2017 11:56, Stephen wrote:
>> On 6/4/2017 7:36 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This latest series of images would be a good basis for a weird
>>>>> animation.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don't know about weird but a neat animation certainly. :-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> My 'weird' refers to the content of course ;-) Semantics? Semantics!
>>
>>
>> Yes, semantics.
>> To me weird relates to the supernatural not just being very strange or
>> bizarre.
>>
>>
>>
>
> You are right. I have used it in the (informal) sense, according to the
> Oxford Dictionary.
>
Well, I am a bit of a pedant. I would say that weird is more commonly
used in that way, today.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi(gh)!
On 04.06.2017 08:37, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>
>> Now playing: Floating (Klaus Schulze)
>>
>
> Ah! I liked that one!
>
...beginning with the Lord's Prayer in Arabic!
See you in Khyberspace!
Yadgar
Now playing: Ludwig II von Bayern (Klaus Schulze)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 4-6-2017 13:53, Stephen wrote:
> On 6/4/2017 12:09 PM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>> On 4-6-2017 11:56, Stephen wrote:
>>> On 6/4/2017 7:36 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> This latest series of images would be a good basis for a weird
>>>>>> animation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't know about weird but a neat animation certainly. :-)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> My 'weird' refers to the content of course ;-) Semantics? Semantics!
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, semantics.
>>> To me weird relates to the supernatural not just being very strange or
>>> bizarre.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> You are right. I have used it in the (informal) sense, according to the
>> Oxford Dictionary.
>>
>
> Well, I am a bit of a pedant. I would say that weird is more commonly
> used in that way, today.
>
I would not be able to tell; you are the native speaker :-)
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Hi(gh)!
>
> On 04.06.2017 08:37, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>>
>>> Now playing: Floating (Klaus Schulze)
>>>
>>
>> Ah! I liked that one!
>>
> ...beginning with the Lord's Prayer in Arabic!
Now, that is a bit of info I did not know and had been wondering about
since I first heard the piece back in the seventies.
Anecdote: I first heard it at a painting exhibition. Music and paintings
went so well together that I asked the artist (who was present) who the
composer was. I immediately after bought a couple of records.
>
> See you in Khyberspace!
>
> Yadgar
>
> Now playing: Ludwig II von Bayern (Klaus Schulze)
Another one indeed!
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi(gh)!
On 05.06.2017 08:46, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>> Now playing: Ludwig II von Bayern (Klaus Schulze)
>
> Another one indeed!
>
Yes, I recently started to buy the albums (one CD per month) played in
"Schwingungen" ("oscillations"), the famous German electronic music
radio show aired from 1984 to 1995, which I frequently taped back
then... and there also was Schulze's double album "X", containing
"musical biographies", amazingly (as Schulze declares himself a
Wagnerian) there is no track dedicated to Richard Wagner... perhaps it
would have turned "X" into a triple or even quadruple album!
To get the topic back to POV-Ray... there are in fact some electronic
pieces in my collection which I really would like to translate into
POV-Ray images or animations... for example "Delta One", "Legacy" and
"Phobos and Deimos go to Mars" by Synergy, or "The Message" by Robert
Schroeder... and there is even one composed by myself, which I would
like to make a (POV-Ray or Blender) video for: "Transrapid",
http://www.myownmusic.de/Yadgar/play/?songid=429382
See you in Khyberspace!
Yadgar
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Pekka Aho wrote on 02/06/2017 18:19:
> "Warping in to a world at its end."
>
> :O
>
Wow, really nice pieces (the last one especially, is very detailed)!
The palette used is very fine: the images seem both ancient and futuristic.
Paolo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Hi(gh)!
>
> On 05.06.2017 08:46, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>>> Now playing: Ludwig II von Bayern (Klaus Schulze)
>>
>> Another one indeed!
>>
>
> Yes, I recently started to buy the albums (one CD per month) played in
> "Schwingungen" ("oscillations"), the famous German electronic music
> radio show aired from 1984 to 1995, which I frequently taped back
> then... and there also was Schulze's double album "X", containing
> "musical biographies", amazingly (as Schulze declares himself a
> Wagnerian) there is no track dedicated to Richard Wagner... perhaps it
> would have turned "X" into a triple or even quadruple album!
>
> To get the topic back to POV-Ray... there are in fact some electronic
> pieces in my collection which I really would like to translate into
> POV-Ray images or animations... for example "Delta One", "Legacy" and
> "Phobos and Deimos go to Mars" by Synergy, or "The Message" by Robert
> Schroeder... and there is even one composed by myself, which I would
> like to make a (POV-Ray or Blender) video for: "Transrapid",
> http://www.myownmusic.de/Yadgar/play/?songid=429382
>
I forgot to tell that the paintings at the exhibition were painted while
listening to the music of Schulze, so yes, that would be a good idea.
I could not get the music playing though ...
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Pekka Aho" <pek### [at] gmail com> wrote:
>
I love these sequences. This is something I have never tried, to make the viewer
ask the question 'what exactly am I looking at?' The sense of disorientation is
captured beautifully, just like those first photographs from the various landers
(agree with Bald Eagle, also thinking of venus (that russian photo) and various
martain aerial views) where you end up turning your head this way and that to
see if it makes things any clearer.
Are these images composites or a single rendering?
Cheers,
Simon.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
