On 4-6-2017 11:56, Stephen wrote:
> On 6/4/2017 7:36 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>>>
>>>> This latest series of images would be a good basis for a weird
>>>> animation.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I don't know about weird but a neat animation certainly. :-)
>>>
>>>
>>
>> My 'weird' refers to the content of course ;-) Semantics? Semantics!
>
>
> Yes, semantics.
> To me weird relates to the supernatural not just being very strange or
> bizarre.
>
>
>

You are right. I have used it in the (informal) sense, according to the 
Oxford Dictionary.

-- 
Thomas

Post a reply to this message