On 6/4/2017 12:09 PM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> On 4-6-2017 11:56, Stephen wrote:
>> On 6/4/2017 7:36 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This latest series of images would be a good basis for a weird
>>>>> animation.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don't know about weird but a neat animation certainly. :-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> My 'weird' refers to the content of course ;-) Semantics? Semantics!
>>
>>
>> Yes, semantics.
>> To me weird relates to the supernatural not just being very strange or
>> bizarre.
>>
>>
>>
>
> You are right. I have used it in the (informal) sense, according to the
> Oxford Dictionary.
>

Well, I am a bit of a pedant. I would say that weird is more commonly 
used in that way, today.

-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message