On 4-6-2017 13:53, Stephen wrote:
> On 6/4/2017 12:09 PM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>> On 4-6-2017 11:56, Stephen wrote:
>>> On 6/4/2017 7:36 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> This latest series of images would be a good basis for a weird
>>>>>> animation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't know about weird but a neat animation certainly. :-)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> My 'weird' refers to the content of course ;-) Semantics? Semantics!
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, semantics.
>>> To me weird relates to the supernatural not just being very strange or
>>> bizarre.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> You are right. I have used it in the (informal) sense, according to the
>> Oxford Dictionary.
>>
>
> Well, I am a bit of a pedant. I would say that weird is more commonly
> used in that way, today.
>

I would not be able to tell; you are the native speaker :-)

-- 
Thomas

Post a reply to this message