|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Warp
Subject: Re: Since the Invisible Orchid has not asked any questions for a while.
Date: 3 Sep 2015 05:58:16
Message: <55e819b7@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> How long would it take to reach a star 10 light years away, assuming
> both Sol and the star are at rest relative to each other? And how long
> would it seem to take to the crew?
Here's an easier question: How fast would you need to travel (from
the point of view of Earth) in order to reach that star in 10 years
from your own point of view?
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> > Cannot be done. :-(
> > I forgot that as your speed increases your mass increases.
>
> Your speed increases relative to what?
>
Your initial velocity. V0
> You are always at rest relative to yourself. Your mass doesn't increase
> from your own perspective, no matter what something else measures your
> speed to be. (From your own perspective it's that external observer's
> mass that's increasing, not yours.)
>
That is a valid way of looking at it.
You feel not the force of acceleration but the force of the rest of the
universe's mass increasing.
> --
> - Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> On 26-8-2015 17:51, Stephen wrote:
> > Mike Horvath <mik### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Nerds.
> >
> > Indeed! and you are not the only one who thinks so.
> > I updated Thunderbird yesterday and this thread has been deleted and ignored.
> > We must be getting too close to a truth that should not be discussed.
> >
> > I knew that I should not have stopped off at Roswell a couple of years ago. A
> > marked man, I must be.
> >
> >
>
> Somehow, those things always happens to people developing means (or
> trying to) to travel to the stars...
>
Which reminded me of a story by Harry Harrison* called Toy shop.
http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/22966
similar. Some hobbyist in the depth of England, it could have been Norfolk or
the West Country. Invented a gizmo in his garden shed which did something
similar. Only he immigrated to Oz where someone sponsored him to research it.
Never heard about him again. Spooky!
*
I thought that it was an Isaac Asimov short story. But I came across it today
and it is only a couple of pages.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: clipka
Subject: Re: Since the Invisible Orchid has not asked any questions for awhile.
Date: 11 Sep 2015 16:24:32
Message: <55f33880$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 11.09.2015 um 22:06 schrieb Stephen:
> Which reminded me of a story by Harry Harrison* called Toy shop.
> http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/22966
Now /that's/ what I call true genius...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Since the Invisible Orchid has not asked any questions forawhile.
Date: 11 Sep 2015 18:03:13
Message: <55f34fa1$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 9/11/2015 9:23 PM, clipka wrote:
> Am 11.09.2015 um 22:06 schrieb Stephen:
>
>> Which reminded me of a story by Harry Harrison* called Toy shop.
>> http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/22966
>
> Now /that's/ what I call true genius...
>
It has stuck with me for about 50 years.
I don't know whether it was my age or if there were a lot more "make you
think" short stories. It was like a sub-sub-genre with points for
brevity. You have probably read Knock. The shortest SF story. If not:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knock_%28short_story%29
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: Since the Invisible Orchid has not asked any questions forawhile.
Date: 12 Sep 2015 03:31:46
Message: <55f3d4e2$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 12-9-2015 0:03, Stephen wrote:
> On 9/11/2015 9:23 PM, clipka wrote:
>> Am 11.09.2015 um 22:06 schrieb Stephen:
>>
>>> Which reminded me of a story by Harry Harrison* called Toy shop.
>>> http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/22966
>>
>> Now /that's/ what I call true genius...
>>
>
> It has stuck with me for about 50 years.
> I don't know whether it was my age or if there were a lot more "make you
> think" short stories. It was like a sub-sub-genre with points for
> brevity. You have probably read Knock. The shortest SF story. If not:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knock_%28short_story%29
>
>
>
>
Somehow, now that you mention it, this sub-sub-genre seems to have
totally vanished from the shelves. A pity; it was most enjoyable.
Which reminds me of the following story by Damon Knight: "To Serve Man"
http://perrylocal.org/mostova/files/2011/09/To-Serve-Man.pdf
Like you, it stuck with me since the 1960's. I first read it in French
translation, in the now legendary magazine /Planète/.
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Since the Invisible Orchid has not asked any questions forawhile.
Date: 12 Sep 2015 04:50:31
Message: <55f3e757$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 9/12/2015 8:31 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> On 12-9-2015 0:03, Stephen wrote:
>> On 9/11/2015 9:23 PM, clipka wrote:
>>> Am 11.09.2015 um 22:06 schrieb Stephen:
>>>
>>>> Which reminded me of a story by Harry Harrison* called Toy shop.
>>>> http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/22966
>>>
>>> Now /that's/ what I call true genius...
>>>
>>
>> It has stuck with me for about 50 years.
>> I don't know whether it was my age or if there were a lot more "make you
>> think" short stories. It was like a sub-sub-genre with points for
>> brevity. You have probably read Knock. The shortest SF story. If not:
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knock_%28short_story%29
>>
>>
>>
>>
> Somehow, now that you mention it, this sub-sub-genre seems to have
> totally vanished from the shelves. A pity; it was most enjoyable.
>
Isaac Asimov had a weakness for Short-short stories that were puns.
> Which reminds me of the following story by Damon Knight: "To Serve Man"
> http://perrylocal.org/mostova/files/2011/09/To-Serve-Man.pdf
> Like you, it stuck with me since the 1960's. I first read it in French
> translation, in the now legendary magazine /Planète/.
>
That one is one of my memories too.
I did not read many magazines by the time the American ones got to
Glasgow they would be in batches several months late. The British
magazines would be difficult to find. It was mostly library books that
kept me going.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: Since the Invisible Orchid has not asked any questions forawhile.
Date: 12 Sep 2015 07:28:47
Message: <55f40c6f$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 12-9-2015 10:50, Stephen wrote:
> On 9/12/2015 8:31 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>> On 12-9-2015 0:03, Stephen wrote:
>>> On 9/11/2015 9:23 PM, clipka wrote:
>>>> Am 11.09.2015 um 22:06 schrieb Stephen:
>>>>
>>>>> Which reminded me of a story by Harry Harrison* called Toy shop.
>>>>> http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/22966
>>>>
>>>> Now /that's/ what I call true genius...
>>>>
>>>
>>> It has stuck with me for about 50 years.
>>> I don't know whether it was my age or if there were a lot more "make you
>>> think" short stories. It was like a sub-sub-genre with points for
>>> brevity. You have probably read Knock. The shortest SF story. If not:
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knock_%28short_story%29
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Somehow, now that you mention it, this sub-sub-genre seems to have
>> totally vanished from the shelves. A pity; it was most enjoyable.
>>
>
> Isaac Asimov had a weakness for Short-short stories that were puns.
>
>> Which reminds me of the following story by Damon Knight: "To Serve Man"
>> http://perrylocal.org/mostova/files/2011/09/To-Serve-Man.pdf
>> Like you, it stuck with me since the 1960's. I first read it in French
>> translation, in the now legendary magazine /Planète/.
>>
>
> That one is one of my memories too.
> I did not read many magazines by the time the American ones got to
> Glasgow they would be in batches several months late. The British
> magazines would be difficult to find. It was mostly library books that
> kept me going.
>
I really got started on SF when I moved to Amsterdam in '66 where I
discovered Analog and began collecting SF books. Iirc Analog was the
only magazine available in stores; others (no UK) were either not there
or only irregularly.
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Since the Invisible Orchid has not asked any questions forawhile.
Date: 12 Sep 2015 08:57:20
Message: <55f42130$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 9/12/2015 12:28 PM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>> That one is one of my memories too.
>> I did not read many magazines by the time the American ones got to
>> Glasgow they would be in batches several months late. The British
>> magazines would be difficult to find. It was mostly library books that
>> kept me going.
>>
> I really got started on SF when I moved to Amsterdam in '66 where I
> discovered Analog and began collecting SF books. Iirc Analog was the
> only magazine available in stores; others (no UK) were either not there
> or only irregularly.
I was about ten when I found Kemlo the space cadet. I have been hooked
ever since. Glasgow being a port, would get pallets of American Pulp
Fiction that had been used as ballast. They were sold in "Second hand
bookshops" where you could return them and get back half of what you
paid. They were really subscription libraries for American genre
fiction. Cowboy, WWII stories, Romantic and SF. These shops were always
in poor parts of town, near either a railway station or the docks.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: Since the Invisible Orchid has not asked any questions forawhile.
Date: 13 Sep 2015 03:05:05
Message: <55f52021$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 12-9-2015 14:57, Stephen wrote:
> On 9/12/2015 12:28 PM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>>> That one is one of my memories too.
>>> I did not read many magazines by the time the American ones got to
>>> Glasgow they would be in batches several months late. The British
>>> magazines would be difficult to find. It was mostly library books that
>>> kept me going.
>>>
>> I really got started on SF when I moved to Amsterdam in '66 where I
>> discovered Analog and began collecting SF books. Iirc Analog was the
>> only magazine available in stores; others (no UK) were either not there
>> or only irregularly.
>
> I was about ten when I found Kemlo the space cadet. I have been hooked
> ever since. Glasgow being a port, would get pallets of American Pulp
> Fiction that had been used as ballast. They were sold in "Second hand
> bookshops" where you could return them and get back half of what you
> paid. They were really subscription libraries for American genre
> fiction. Cowboy, WWII stories, Romantic and SF. These shops were always
> in poor parts of town, near either a railway station or the docks.
>
A treasure trove! No, I did not have that chance. For many years SF was
restricted to Jules Verne, but I was hooked early on somehow, not in the
least by the international space competition (Sputnik!). I still can
remember putting my ear to the /wireless/ to listen to its
bip-bip-bip..... :-)
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |