POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.off-topic : Core, look at that... Server Time
29 Jul 2024 22:20:35 EDT (-0400)
  Core, look at that... (Message 11 to 20 of 21)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 1 Messages >>>
From: Darren New
Subject: Re: Core, look at that...
Date: 25 Jun 2011 13:44:40
Message: <4e061e88$1@news.povray.org>
On 6/25/2011 6:28, Jim Holsenback wrote:
> I worked on a piece of avionics gear that was used to identify submarine
> acoustic signatures ... it was loaded with mag core memory

I knew someone who worked on modern military helicopters, at least some of 
which also have mag core memory.  The thing is, it's non-volatile. You can 
lose power without wiping out your mission or having to reboot or whatever.

When I was in college, I was working on a big assembly program on a 
mainframe. 20 minutes into a 30 minute compile, all the lights go out. I 
think "Well, so much for getting this done before lunch."  Three minutes 
later, the lights come back on, I start getting messages on the terminal 
about disks being inaccessible, and then ten minutes later I get "compile 
completed."  So, yeah, there was enough voltage in the capacitors to save 
the registers out to memory when the power-fail interrupt came along.

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   "Coding without comments is like
    driving without turn signals."


Post a reply to this message

From: Alain
Subject: Re: Core, look at that...
Date: 25 Jun 2011 20:34:52
Message: <4e067eac$1@news.povray.org>

>>> Also: My dad has a Honeywell central heating system. WTF?
>>
>> Why WTF??
>
> That's like... that's like a company that manufactures motorbikes also
> manufacturing pianos!
>
> ...oh, wait...
>

It's rather a piano maker that also make motorbikes. There where Yamaha 
pianos long before the first Yamaha bike...


Post a reply to this message

From: Orchid XP v8
Subject: Re: Core, look at that...
Date: 26 Jun 2011 05:20:29
Message: <4e06f9dd@news.povray.org>
On 25/06/2011 06:44 PM, Darren New wrote:

> I knew someone who worked on modern military helicopters, at least some
> of which also have mag core memory. The thing is, it's non-volatile. You
> can lose power without wiping out your mission or having to reboot or
> whatever.

I wonder how well the power consumption of core compares to flash.

Because, let's face it, flash is available in densities that core will 
never match.

Also, I was under the impression that core requires constant temperature 
operating conditions, or you have to recalibrate it.

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*


Post a reply to this message

From: clipka
Subject: Re: Core, look at that...
Date: 26 Jun 2011 06:07:36
Message: <4e0704e8$1@news.povray.org>
Am 25.06.2011 19:44, schrieb Darren New:
> I knew someone who worked on modern military helicopters, at least some
> of which also have mag core memory. The thing is, it's non-volatile. You
> can lose power without wiping out your mission or having to reboot or
> whatever.

Flash memory would do that, too. But I guess when the military does such 
things, they know what they want. Robustness against gamma rays or EMP 
or some such might be a reason.


Post a reply to this message

From: Darren New
Subject: Re: Core, look at that...
Date: 26 Jun 2011 14:37:23
Message: <4e077c63$1@news.povray.org>
On 6/26/2011 3:07, clipka wrote:
> Am 25.06.2011 19:44, schrieb Darren New:
>> I knew someone who worked on modern military helicopters, at least some
>> of which also have mag core memory. The thing is, it's non-volatile. You
>> can lose power without wiping out your mission or having to reboot or
>> whatever.
>
> Flash memory would do that, too. But I guess when the military does such
> things, they know what they want. Robustness against gamma rays or EMP or
> some such might be a reason.

Well, to be fair, by "modern" I meant "not 1960's", I didn't necessarily 
mean "2011". :-) This was... let's see... 1990 or so?  So maybe they're 
using flash now.

Another restriction is that you have to be able to actually erase the memory 
completely, such as in the event of landing in enemy territory. I don't know 
how well flash erases.

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   "Coding without comments is like
    driving without turn signals."


Post a reply to this message

From: Le Forgeron
Subject: Re: Core, look at that...
Date: 26 Jun 2011 14:51:52
Message: <4e077fc8@news.povray.org>
Le 26/06/2011 20:37, Darren New nous fit lire :
> On 6/26/2011 3:07, clipka wrote:

>> Flash memory would do that, too. But I guess when the military does such
>> things, they know what they want. Robustness against gamma rays or EMP or
>> some such might be a reason.
> 
> Well, to be fair, by "modern" I meant "not 1960's", I didn't necessarily
> mean "2011". :-) This was... let's see... 1990 or so?  So maybe they're
> using flash now.
> 

Flash have a limited number of write, not something you want to deal
with in a desert year long operation.
(military helicopters have such a long live time, mechanical maintenance
is ok on field, but electronic maintenance is always long, expensive &
tricky (i.e. not for the sergent)

> Another restriction is that you have to be able to actually erase the
> memory completely, such as in the event of landing in enemy territory. I
> don't know how well flash erases.
> 
Usually a little explosive if all they need... as long as it is not
triggered by the EMP. If the information is really sensitive.
Usually it is not: the main target (or secondary ones) is just
coordinates for that mission. And nowadays, everyone has maps.
The Friend-or-Foe identifiers will be changed by the next day/hour, no
problem either.


Post a reply to this message

From: Darren New
Subject: Re: Core, look at that...
Date: 26 Jun 2011 15:00:38
Message: <4e0781d6$1@news.povray.org>
On 6/26/2011 11:51, Le_Forgeron wrote:
> Flash have a limited number of write, not something you want to deal
> with in a desert year long operation.

It's also easy to plug in and out, compared to core. :-)

>> Another restriction is that you have to be able to actually erase the
>> memory completely, such as in the event of landing in enemy territory. I
>> don't know how well flash erases.
>>
> Usually a little explosive if all they need...

I think the idea was you erase it when you park the vehicle, maybe? I was 
under the impression they didn't want to actually destroy the thing, but 
rather that this was a normal part of operations.

I wasn't sure what he was trying to erase, of course.

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   "Coding without comments is like
    driving without turn signals."


Post a reply to this message

From: Alain
Subject: Re: Core, look at that...
Date: 26 Jun 2011 16:12:13
Message: <4e07929d$1@news.povray.org>
Le 2011/06/26 06:07, clipka a écrit :
> Am 25.06.2011 19:44, schrieb Darren New:
>> I knew someone who worked on modern military helicopters, at least some
>> of which also have mag core memory. The thing is, it's non-volatile. You
>> can lose power without wiping out your mission or having to reboot or
>> whatever.
>
> Flash memory would do that, too. But I guess when the military does such
> things, they know what they want. Robustness against gamma rays or EMP
> or some such might be a reason.

Core against an EMP? An EMP can very easily whipe out any magnetic core 
at an intensity that would not affect any consumer grade flash unit. 
Then, you can have military grade hardened flash memory that's shielded 
against such agressions.

As for gamma rays... a simple redudency system will do.


Post a reply to this message

From: Mike Raiford
Subject: Re: Core, look at that...
Date: 27 Jun 2011 08:51:56
Message: <4e087cec$1@news.povray.org>
On 6/25/2011 7:34 PM, Alain wrote:

> It's rather a piano maker that also make motorbikes. There where Yamaha
> pianos long before the first Yamaha bike...

But, is that the same Yamaha?

-- 
~Mike


Post a reply to this message

From: Jim Holsenback
Subject: Re: Core, look at that...
Date: 27 Jun 2011 09:02:55
Message: <4e087f7f@news.povray.org>
On 06/27/2011 09:51 AM, Mike Raiford wrote:
> On 6/25/2011 7:34 PM, Alain wrote:
>
>> It's rather a piano maker that also make motorbikes. There where Yamaha
>> pianos long before the first Yamaha bike...
>
> But, is that the same Yamaha?
>
yep ... same logo anyways


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 1 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.