Right!

Result of use of latest version. The building is showing a much smoother 
texture now (no noise is used here). I added some more features to the 
building. The smoke seems to originate *beside* the altar but is not. It 
starts horizontally before going upwards. I assume there is a bug in the 
wind effect of the smokegen macro (Mikael Carneholm) or the mistake is mine 
:-)

For the wall-and-gate, I have to experiment further. Nothing really 
stricking is showing here so some tuning might be in order.

Thomas

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'boullee_cenotaphe_adapted_14.jpg' (105 KB)

Preview of image 'boullee_cenotaphe_adapted_14.jpg'

"Thomas de Groot" <tDOTdegroot@interDOTnlANOTHERDOTnet> wrote:
> Right!
>
> Result of use of latest version. The building is showing a much smoother
> texture now (no noise is used here). I added some more features to the
> building. The smoke seems to originate *beside* the altar but is not. It
> starts horizontally before going upwards. I assume there is a bug in the
> wind effect of the smokegen macro (Mikael Carneholm) or the mistake is mine
> :-)
>
> For the wall-and-gate, I have to experiment further. Nothing really
> stricking is showing here so some tuning might be in order.
>
> Thomas

Looking good!

Please tell me if there are any changes you would like in the macros - I'd like
it if the macros were something people could actually use with as little effort
as possible.

And here's another texture - steel with some scratching on the outside, and rust
on the inside.

Cheers,
Edouard.

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'prox_steel_trefoil.jpg' (80 KB)

Preview of image 'prox_steel_trefoil.jpg'

"Edouard" <pov### [at] edouardinfo> schreef in bericht 
news:web.4aa90e66d49c2f41c83e2c410@news.povray.org...
>
> Looking good!
Yes, I think so too. The macro is very easy to use now. Got a version here 
now with noise which is even better, at least for the cenotaph. Used 
add_noise and pattern smoothing for the cenotaph; only add_noise for the 
gate.

>
> Please tell me if there are any changes you would like in the macros - I'd 
> like
> it if the macros were something people could actually use with as little 
> effort
> as possible.
I think the only thing which could use some automation is the noise, 
especially the slope/altitude code which should be scaled to the size of the 
object. The other scales are more or less intuitive I think, as they can 
reflect the taste of the user. Not sure though, I want to experiment a bit 
with that.

>
> And here's another texture - steel with some scratching on the outside, 
> and rust
> on the inside.
Yes, nice one too!

Thomas

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'boullee_cenotaphe_adapted_14.jpg' (105 KB)

Preview of image 'boullee_cenotaphe_adapted_14.jpg'

>Edouard  on date 10/09/2009 16:34 wrote:
> "Thomas de Groot" <tDOTdegroot@interDOTnlANOTHERDOTnet> wrote:
>> Right!
>>
>> Result of use of latest version. The building is showing a much smoother
>> texture now (no noise is used here). I added some more features to the
>> building. The smoke seems to originate *beside* the altar but is not. It
>> starts horizontally before going upwards. I assume there is a bug in the
>> wind effect of the smokegen macro (Mikael Carneholm) or the mistake is mine
>> :-)
>>
>> For the wall-and-gate, I have to experiment further. Nothing really
>> stricking is showing here so some tuning might be in order.
>>
>> Thomas
> 
> Looking good!
> 
> Please tell me if there are any changes you would like in the macros - I'd like
> it if the macros were something people could actually use with as little effort
> as possible.
> 
> And here's another texture - steel with some scratching on the outside, and rust
> on the inside.
> 
> Cheers,
> Edouard.
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
Wow, very persuasive!
;-)
Paolo

Post a reply to this message

Thomas de Groot wrote:
> Yes, I think so too. The macro is very easy to use now. Got a version here 
> now with noise which is even better, at least for the cenotaph. Used 
> add_noise and pattern smoothing for the cenotaph; only add_noise for the 
> gate.

I would be interested in seeing a panoramic version of the scene, using 
PanoSalado or something.

-Mike

Post a reply to this message

> And here's another texture - steel with some scratching on the outside, and rust
> on the inside.

Last one - the Ajax mesh with a steel proximity texture, and some
post-processing in Photoshop.

Cheers,
Edouard.

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'steel_ajax_office_probe.jpg' (96 KB)

Preview of image 'steel_ajax_office_probe.jpg'

"SharkD" <mik### [at] gmailcom> schreef in bericht 
news:4aa92bf9$1@news.povray.org...
>
> I would be interested in seeing a panoramic version of the scene, using 
> PanoSalado or something.

At this stage, a panoramic view is not really interesting as there is 
nothing else to show :-)  Later on maybe. It depends very much on the 
filling of the scene.

Thomas

Post a reply to this message

"Paolo Gibellini" <p.g### [at] gmailcom> schreef in bericht 
news:4aa92b84$1@news.povray.org...
> Wow, very persuasive!
> ;-)

Yep! Thanks! Going the right way indeed.

Thomas

Post a reply to this message

"Edouard" <pov### [at] edouardinfo> schreef in bericht 
news:web.4aa9a5f8d49c2f41c83e2c410@news.povray.org...
>> And here's another texture - steel with some scratching on the outside, 
>> and rust
>> on the inside.
>
> Last one - the Ajax mesh with a steel proximity texture, and some
> post-processing in Photoshop.
>

Excellent! After working on the cenotaph, I shall have to put my hands to 
some scuptures too indeed.

Thomas

Post a reply to this message

> "SharkD" <mik### [at] gmailcom> schreef in bericht 
> news:4aa92bf9$1@news.povray.org...
>> I would be interested in seeing a panoramic version of the scene, using 
>> PanoSalado or something.
> 
> At this stage, a panoramic view is not really interesting as there is 
> nothing else to show :-)  Later on maybe. It depends very much on the 
> filling of the scene.
> 
> Thomas
> 
> 

For a panoramic, you'd need to move the camera forward to put it 
somewhere in the yard.

Then, just, maybe, place some place holders beheind the gates.


Alain

Post a reply to this message