I had a try at rendering the image based on your source (with numerous
changes, including converting to the left handed sytem from moray's
right-handed one). For the lightsource I used an array of point lights
(12x12) rather than an area light, as I couldn't get smooth photons with an
area light.  I also changed the materials to use fresnel reflection.  One of
the most important changes here is the change in the colour definitions for
the walls.  As you can see, the caustics appear white now where they are
oversaturated.  As Nathan pointed out, you need to have non-zero components
(even if minimal) in all three colours:
Red = rgb <0.88039, 0.10196, 0.10980>
Blue = rgb <0.18039, 0.23922, 0.87843>

I found an article relating to light and colour a while ago that had stated
something to the fact that in real-life, pure R G or B colours don't exist,
they are only theoretical (or something like that, I don't have the link
anymore at present, but I'm sure it would be easy to find this information
somewhere again)

Render time 15h 43m 16s
Oddly enough, with the method I used the photons took virtually no time to
parse (<1s) yet they look very resonable.

-tgq

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'test room.JPG' (72 KB)

Preview of image 'test room.JPG'

> I had a try at rendering the image based on your source (with numerous
> changes, including converting to the left handed sytem from moray's
> right-handed one). For the lightsource I used an array of point lights
> (12x12) rather than an area light, as I couldn't get smooth photons with
an
> area light.  I also changed the materials to use fresnel reflection.  One
of
> the most important changes here is the change in the colour definitions
for
> the walls.  As you can see, the caustics appear white now where they are
> oversaturated.  As Nathan pointed out, you need to have non-zero
components
> (even if minimal) in all three colours:
> Red = rgb <0.88039, 0.10196, 0.10980>
> Blue = rgb <0.18039, 0.23922, 0.87843>
>
> I found an article relating to light and colour a while ago that had
stated
> something to the fact that in real-life, pure R G or B colours don't
exist,
> they are only theoretical (or something like that, I don't have the link
> anymore at present, but I'm sure it would be easy to find this information
> somewhere again)
>
> Render time 15h 43m 16s
> Oddly enough, with the method I used the photons took virtually no time to
> parse (<1s) yet they look very resonable.
>
> -tgq

Wow, there's an improvement!  It looks very good, can you share your source?

-Paragon

Post a reply to this message

> Wow, there's an improvement!  It looks very good, can you share your
source?
>
> -Paragon

Certainly, I'll post the files in p.b.s-f.  My apologies to you, the scene
files look nothing like the originals anymore after I fixed them up to match
my style of coding (especially moray's hideous right-handed method).
I virtually re-positioned each ball by trial and error to try to match the
original.  Same with the camera parameters, the camera is now behind the
wall.  (Inside rather, I used the method suggested by Captain Tylor with a
transparent inside texture and regulat outside texture. I originally tried
using no_image, but radiosity didn't seem to be affected by that wall with
this method).

-tgq

Post a reply to this message

In article <3d2ae011@news.povray.org>, "TinCanMan" <Tin### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
>I had a try at rendering the image based on your source (with numerous
>changes, including converting to the left handed sytem from moray's
>right-handed one). For the lightsource I used an array of point lights
>(12x12) rather than an area light, as I couldn't get smooth photons with an
>area light.  I also changed the materials to use fresnel reflection.  One of
>the most important changes here is the change in the colour definitions for
>the walls.  As you can see, the caustics appear white now where they are
>oversaturated.  As Nathan pointed out, you need to have non-zero components
>(even if minimal) in all three colours:
>Red = rgb <0.88039, 0.10196, 0.10980>
>Blue = rgb <0.18039, 0.23922, 0.87843>
>
>I found an article relating to light and colour a while ago that had stated
>something to the fact that in real-life, pure R G or B colours don't exist,
>they are only theoretical (or something like that, I don't have the link
>anymore at present, but I'm sure it would be easy to find this information
>somewhere again)
>
>Render time 15h 43m 16s
>Oddly enough, with the method I used the photons took virtually no time to
>parse (<1s) yet they look very resonable.
>
>-tgq
>

As somebody that uses both PovRay and Lightwave, I have to say something.  
First of all, to both Paragon and TinCanMan, those are fantastic renders, and 
very close to the original.  I've made attempts in the past to duplicat PovRay 
images using Lightwave, with varying levels of success.  It's refreshing to 
see the challenge in the other direction.

I actually prefer Paragon's original image overall, but the caustics are 
closer to the LW version in TinCanMan's version.  The finish on the floating 
glass sphere makes it look almost cartoony to me.

*Rarius-
 There's another comparison to keep in mind besides price, namely render time.
I rendered up a passable image in LW in about 10 minutes.  15 hours in 
Lightwave is more like an animation instead of a single frame. ;-)

Post a reply to this message

> I actually prefer Paragon's original image overall, but the caustics are
> closer to the LW version in TinCanMan's version.  The finish on the
floating
> glass sphere makes it look almost cartoony to me.
Yes, there is a sort of 'halo' around the edge of the glass balls, this is a
result of the fresnel type variable reflection.  I don't know if this is
realistic or if it is a pitfall of using fresnel with transparent objects.
I'll have to find myself a glass ball to look at.

-tgq

Post a reply to this message

"TinCanMan" <Tin### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:3d2b4552$1@news.povray.org...
> > I actually prefer Paragon's original image overall, but the caustics are
> > closer to the LW version in TinCanMan's version.  The finish on the
> floating
> > glass sphere makes it look almost cartoony to me.
> Yes, there is a sort of 'halo' around the edge of the glass balls, this is
a
> result of the fresnel type variable reflection.  I don't know if this is
> realistic or if it is a pitfall of using fresnel with transparent objects.
> I'll have to find myself a glass ball to look at.

Did you try conserve_energy?

Post a reply to this message

> Did you try conserve_energy?

Yes

-tga

Post a reply to this message

"TinCanMan" <Tin### [at] hotmailcom> wrote...
> > Did you try conserve_energy?
>
> Yes

Make sure to use "photons{ collect off }" for glass and metal objects.

-Nathan

Post a reply to this message

> > Did you try conserve_energy?
>
> Yes
>
> -tga

Ooops! I must apologize, I didn't have it on. Usually I have it in there all
the time by default, but this time it must've slipped out and I didn't
notice.  The effect disappears now, perhaps I'll run the long render over
night again for tomorrow.

-tgq

Post a reply to this message

Here is a new render with the 'conserve_energy' put into the glass material,
much better (I hadn't noticed it missing earlier).  Some of the other
quality settings have been changed.

Render Time: 1h 35m 26s  (P4 1GHz 256RAM WIN2000)
Parse Time: 1s
# photons shot: 28400
# surface photons stored: 26816

global_settings {
  adc_bailout 0.00001
  ambient_light 1
  assumed_gamma 1.8
  max_trace_level 25
    radiosity{
      pretrace_start 0.08
      pretrace_end 0.04
      count 100
      recursion_limit 5
      nearest_count 10
      error_bound 1.8
      low_error_factor .5
      minimum_reuse 0.0001
      brightness 1
    }
    photons{
     spacing 0.0033
     radius 10
      autostop 0
      gather 200,1000
      max_trace_level 5
    }
}


20x20 array of spotlights used

glass and metal objects have a target value of  400 (20*20)

I am surprised to get such smooth photon results with such a large target
spacing factor and such a low parse time.  Any clue as to why this is so?

-tgq

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'test room2.JPG' (59 KB)

Preview of image 'test room2.JPG'