 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
in <3ab4fcf6$1@news.povray.org> Margus Ramst wrote:
>Maybe you could use something else to balance the
>image (an island, a large moon, etc, etc) and/or shift the viewpoint
>so the platform is more centered.
a ship
Ingo
--
Photography: http://members.home.nl/ingoogni/
Pov-Ray : http://members.home.nl/seed7/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Margus Ramst wrote:
> Maybe you could use something else to balance the
> image (an island, a large moon, etc, etc) and/or shift the viewpoint so the
> platform is more centered.
a rainbow
Karl
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nice..
Just an idea : the second platform has to be farther, and in a hole in the water
too...
--
FD aka Freddy D. aka Prof D.
Pro### [at] wanadoo fr
http://profd.est-ici.org
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"H.E. Day" <The### [at] hedayfreeserverscom> wrote :
>
> Comments? Enjoy!
I agree that two implies hundreds, and the station loses it's
incongruity and uniqueness. The falls are a little grainy but other-wise I
would replace the second station with almost anything else and then call it
finished.
Maybe a fleet of supply ships coming in at about 300 ft? Or a close up
of a ship leaving? Anything occupying about the same visual space would do,
but something that adds to the story would be best.
What's the story?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Margus Ramst wrote:
> Maybe you could use something else to balance the
> image (an island, a large moon, etc, etc) and/or shift the viewpoint so
the
> platform is more centered
a penguin...?
-Chris-
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
It's very beautiful! :o)
May I ask something? Is your philosophy to reuse only the things you
have found to "work great"? I mean, a lot of POV'ers seem to experiement
with new things all the time.. But maybe you mostly stick with things
you already succesfully invented; continuing to use them? (This includes
textures, principles, modelling and lighting)
I'm just thinking about how you acheive these great results, moreover in
a short amount of time, with a relative slow computer.. And may I humbly
ask, if you could share the water texture with us? Please. It's the best
POV water I've seen so far.
Eminent! What more to say..
Byebye,
Hugo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> May I ask something? Is your philosophy to reuse only the things you
> have found to "work great"? I mean, a lot of POV'ers seem to experiement
> with new things all the time.. But maybe you mostly stick with things
> you already succesfully invented; continuing to use them? (This includes
> textures, principles, modelling and lighting)
Hmm. I don't think so. My images may have a similar style, but I don't
think I don't experiment with every new image. The only thing that may
transfer between images is snippets of trace() code and maybe some lighting
setups (that are quickly altered).
I usually just start with a black text screen and just start typing. When I
get to a point where I think the result might look good, I hit the render
button. Case in point - I built the station from the ground up without
rendering it once (no texturing or landing pads...) . I guess I can just
visualize it. ;)
> I'm just thinking about how you acheive these great results, moreover in
> a short amount of time, with a relative slow computer..
Actually, I'm using a P133 instead of my P200. :) Patience is key.
> And may I humbly
> ask, if you could share the water texture with us? Please. It's the best
> POV water I've seen so far.
I will. When I post Take 6, the water code will be right there. :)
Ta.
H.E. Day
<><
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> I tend to agree with others in that the second platform seems to diminish
> the impact of the image - makes the first platform look less monumental
> and, well, enigmatic. Maybe you could use something else to balance the
> image (an island, a large moon, etc, etc) and/or shift the viewpoint so the
> platform is more centered.
Blimps. Everyone loves blimps, right?
> I'd say the clouds still need some work, they are too bright and look
> somewhat solid (remind me of porcelain for some reason). Perhaps a little
> fluff along the edges would help...
Hmm. I think i have the clouds fixed to my satisfaction. You'll see in the
next image. :)
H.E. Day
<><
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Margus Ramst wrote:
> and, well, enigmatic. Maybe you could use something else to balance the
> image (an island, a large moon, etc, etc) and/or shift the viewpoint so the
> platform is more centered.
A two headed elephant.
--
Ken Tyler
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> A two headed elephant.
Do we really need a picture of John McCain ruining an otherwise marvelous
work of art?
:>}
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
