Ciao, un saluto a tutti i POVisti,

incarnazione
di MegaPov o meglio di PovMan e colgo l'occasione di questo newsgroup
per cercare contatti con altri utenti italiani.
Vorrei porre anche due questioni:
- cosa sono e a che servono i light_group ?

definitiva,

lenta della 3.1 ?
Grazie,
Ceggi

ceg### [at] tiscalinetit

Post a reply to this message

Non dimenticare il prefisso [it]! Ora, ho capito tutto che diceste, ma non



1) light_groups are containers for associating certain lights to certain
objects. You wrap your objects and lights with it, and only those objects
are affected by those lights. You can also control whether or not global
light_sources (i.e. those outside of the light_group) affect the objects
within. That's basically it.

2) Sure, I don't see any harm done by trying it. It will give you good
practice for when it goes final. We need all the help we can get to find
bugs. The only thing is that you should keep your 3.5 install separate from
your old 3.1 install and MegaPOV, since I don't think you can plunk MegaPOV
into the 3.5 bin folder and have it run. I may be wrong. Also, 3.5 is faster
than 3.1 and MegaPOV for most intents and purposes. You will find a few
things that are unfortunately slower. I'm sure you'll appreciate the added
features, though.

Ciao,

"Antonio Lorenzo". :)

Post a reply to this message

Nota: Traduzione non letterale

> 1) light_groups are containers for associating certain lights to certain
> objects. You wrap your objects and lights with it, and only those objects
> are affected by those lights. You can also control whether or not global
> light_sources (i.e. those outside of the light_group) affect the objects
> within. That's basically it.

1) i light_groups consentono di associare determinate luci a determinati
oggetti.


decidere se le luci globali (quelle al di fuori dei light_groups) possano o
meno illuminare gli oggetti del gruppo.

> 2) Sure, I don't see any harm done by trying it. It will give you good
> practice for when it goes final. We need all the help we can get to find
> bugs. The only thing is that you should keep your 3.5 install separate
from
> your old 3.1 install and MegaPOV, since I don't think you can plunk
MegaPOV
> into the 3.5 bin folder and have it run. I may be wrong. Also, 3.5 is
faster
> than 3.1 and MegaPOV for most intents and purposes. You will find a few
> things that are unfortunately slower. I'm sure you'll appreciate the added
> features, though.


definitiva.
Abbiamo bisogno di aiuto per trovare bachi.
Conviene mantenere separate le installazioni di versioni diverse (3.1,
MegaPOV e 3.5), non penso che tu possa infilare MegaPOV nella cartella della
versione 3.5 ed eseguire il tutto. Posso sbagliarmi.


apprezzerai le nuove caratteristiche.

> Ciao,
>
> "Antonio Lorenzo". :)

Post a reply to this message

Grazie, Alex. :)

Post a reply to this message

Ti consiglio senza riserve di scaricare POV 3.5 (anche se sarai costretto a
reinstallarlo frequentemente). Non ti devi preoccupare dell'installazione,

richieda altrimenti). Io, per esempio, ho contemporaneamente installati (ed
utilizzo) POV 3.1, PovMan 0.71 e POV 3.5 senza alcun problema di
sovrascrittura.


da MegaPov.



Per le altre domande ti, ehm... rimando alle risposte di Tony ed Alex.

Saluti,

--
Jonathan.

"ceggi" <ceg### [at] tiscalinetit> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:3bef1455@news.povray.org...
> Ciao, un saluto a tutti i POVisti,

> incarnazione
> di MegaPov o meglio di PovMan e colgo l'occasione di questo newsgroup
> per cercare contatti con altri utenti italiani.
> Vorrei porre anche due questioni:
> - cosa sono e a che servono i light_group ?

> definitiva,


> lenta della 3.1 ?
> Grazie,
> Ceggi
>
> ceg### [at] tiscalinetit
>
>
>
>

Post a reply to this message

Tony[B] wrote:
> ho capito tutto che diceste



--
Jonathan.

Post a reply to this message

Um... Did I forget a "voi"? Sounded right to me... :)

Post a reply to this message

Altavista always translates *you* as *voi* (plural) even if you mean *tu*


refer to a person with *voi* (you plural) by courtesy (for example if you're
talking with an old person). This way is called "dare del voi", so the
sentence you wrote, although correct, sounds funnily *aulic*, like a
prose-work. :)

--
Jonathan.

"Tony[B]" <ben### [at] catholicorg> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:3bf182c5@news.povray.org...

>
> Um... Did I forget a "voi"? Sounded right to me... :)
>
>

Post a reply to this message

Ooops, I missed the main point: "diceste" and "voi diceste" is the same
thing (in italian, like in Spanish, you don't have to write the pronouns).

--
Jonathan.

"Tony[B]" <ben### [at] catholicorg> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:3bf182c5@news.povray.org...

>
> Um... Did I forget a "voi"? Sounded right to me... :)
>
>

Post a reply to this message

> Altavista always translates *you* as *voi* (plural) even if you mean *tu*

che


Ahh, ora capito. Scusa. I never did finish learning. Is "cio" like "that" in
English? (Or "eso/aquello" in Spanish?)

> Yet in italian you can
> refer to a person with *voi* (you plural) by courtesy (for example if
you're
> talking with an old person). This way is called "dare del voi", so the
> sentence you wrote, although correct, sounds funnily *aulic*, like a
> prose-work. :)

Haha. :) The only respectful way I knew of was "lei", which, I must say, is
really strange when talking to men...

Post a reply to this message