POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Water: povray play with -1000 Server Time
24 May 2024 05:11:12 EDT (-0400)
  Water: povray play with -1000 (Message 21 to 30 of 40)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>
From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: Water: povray play with -1000
Date: 27 Mar 2016 08:02:42
Message: <56f7cbe2$1@news.povray.org>
I think you should also investigate: 
http://www.imagico.de/pov/water/water_inc.php

-- 
Thomas


Post a reply to this message

From: LanuHum
Subject: Re: Water: povray play with -1000
Date: 27 Mar 2016 10:10:01
Message: <web.56f7e9adc8daa117a3e03fe0@news.povray.org>
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> I think you should also investigate:
> http://www.imagico.de/pov/water/water_inc.php
>
> --
> Thomas

I know this resource.
There is it:
http://www.imagico.de/pov/water/water05.php

#declare Material_001 = texture{
    pigment{color srgbft <0.5012,0.9606,0.9037,0.0000,0.0000>}
    finish{
        diffuse 0.8000
        brilliance 1.8000
        specular 1.0000
        roughness 0.0200
          }
normal {
  function {
    f_ridged_mf(x, y, z, 0.1, 3.0, 7, 0.7, 0.7, 2)
  } 0.4
  scale <0.01, 0.4, 0.13>*0.2
}
}

It could be very good! :)
But, there is a problem. It's not clear.
Polygons of a wave are expanded more, than other polygons. Shall be on the
contrary (inverse).


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'sea.jpg' (96 KB)

Preview of image 'sea.jpg'
sea.jpg


 

From: LanuHum
Subject: Re: Water: povray play with -1000
Date: 27 Mar 2016 10:40:01
Message: <web.56f7f048c8daa117a3e03fe0@news.povray.org>
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:

>
> It has been a long time since I worked on a seascape...
>
> --
> Thomas

Yes! Thanks.
To my previous post:
The uv_mapping corrects the form, but
To take good result, long time is necessary. :)


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'normal_with_uv_mapping.jpg' (140 KB)

Preview of image 'normal_with_uv_mapping.jpg'
normal_with_uv_mapping.jpg


 

From: Alain
Subject: Re: Water: povray play with -1000
Date: 27 Mar 2016 15:03:15
Message: <56f82e73@news.povray.org>


> I took from utf-8 normal.
>
> #declare Material_001 = texture{
>      pigment{color srgbft <0.5012,0.9606,0.9037,0.0000,0.0000>}
>      finish{
>          diffuse 0.8000
>          brilliance 1.8000
>          specular 1.0000
>          roughness 0.0200
>            }
>      normal{
>          crackle -2 form <1,0,0>
>          scale <.0005,.003,.003>*2
>          poly_wave 2
>            }
> }
>
> Result is very bad. :(
>

crackle -2 ?
That's an extremely strong normal. Try something gentler, like crackle 
-0.2 instead. It should look beter.
Also, you may want to add some turbulence.


Alain


Post a reply to this message

From: Alain
Subject: Re: Water: povray play with -1000
Date: 27 Mar 2016 15:05:47
Message: <56f82f0b$1@news.povray.org>

> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
>> I think you should also investigate:
>> http://www.imagico.de/pov/water/water_inc.php
>>
>> --
>> Thomas
>
> I know this resource.
> There is it:
> http://www.imagico.de/pov/water/water05.php
>
> #declare Material_001 = texture{
>      pigment{color srgbft <0.5012,0.9606,0.9037,0.0000,0.0000>}
>      finish{
>          diffuse 0.8000
>          brilliance 1.8000
>          specular 1.0000
>          roughness 0.0200
>            }
> normal {
>    function {
>      f_ridged_mf(x, y, z, 0.1, 3.0, 7, 0.7, 0.7, 2)
>    } 0.4
>    scale <0.01, 0.4, 0.13>*0.2
> }
> }
>
> It could be very good! :)
> But, there is a problem. It's not clear.
> Polygons of a wave are expanded more, than other polygons. Shall be on the
> contrary (inverse).
>
Those looks like the ripples caused by a cross wind at the top of the waves.


Post a reply to this message

From: LanuHum
Subject: Re: Water: povray play with -1000
Date: 27 Mar 2016 15:55:01
Message: <web.56f8397cc8daa117a3e03fe0@news.povray.org>
Alain <kua### [at] videotronca> wrote:

>
> crackle -2 ?
> That's an extremely strong normal. Try something gentler, like crackle
> -0.2 instead. It should look beter.
> Also, you may want to add some turbulence.
>
>
> Alain

I took from the file without changes.
I play the whole day with parameters, but I don't find an optimal variant.
I will try to create the ocean in the Blender with the internal render and I
will show what I want to achieve on a large scale.

:)


Post a reply to this message

From: LanuHum
Subject: Re: Water: povray play with -1000
Date: 2 Apr 2016 05:55:00
Message: <web.56ff96e9c8daa117a3e03fe0@news.povray.org>
In the Blender it is possible to make so (look attach).
In Povray so it is impossible to make.
It is necessary to try to bend mesh before export to Povray.
For the static picture there are no problems. For this purpose there is a
'Noise' button.
In case of animation - a problem.


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'normal_displace.jpg' (168 KB)

Preview of image 'normal_displace.jpg'
normal_displace.jpg


 

From: Le Forgeron
Subject: Re: Water: povray play with -1000
Date: 2 Apr 2016 06:08:18
Message: <56ff9a12$1@news.povray.org>
Le 02/04/2016 11:54, LanuHum a écrit :
> In the Blender it is possible to make so (look attach).
> In Povray so it is impossible to make.
> It is necessary to try to bend mesh before export to Povray.
> For the static picture there are no problems. For this purpose there is a
> 'Noise' button.
> In case of animation - a problem.
> 

I guess you are talking about deforming a mesh

http://wiki.povray.org/content/User:Le_Forgeron#Getting_a_new_mesh_from_a_mesh

It's not in official povray, but in hgpovray.

Of particular interest, if I got the post right: warp & displace.

I used warp to simulate the wind acting on a flag (moving the reproducible warp a bit
between each frame.
As I was making a cycling animation, the movement was a rotation but any paths would
have do )


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Water: povray play with -1000
Date: 2 Apr 2016 06:17:31
Message: <56ff9c3b$1@news.povray.org>
On 4/2/2016 11:08 AM, Le_Forgeron wrote:

> Yoda: Yes, run! Yes, a Jedi's strength flows from the Renderer. But beware of the
dark side.
>       Mesh, Heightfield, Bicubic Patch; the dark side of the Force are they.

LOL. ;-)

-- 

Regards
     Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: LanuHum
Subject: Re: Water: povray play with -1000
Date: 2 Apr 2016 06:45:00
Message: <web.56ffa1d9c8daa117a3e03fe0@news.povray.org>
Le_Forgeron <jgr### [at] freefr> wrote:
> Le 02/04/2016 11:54, LanuHum a écrit :
> > In the Blender it is possible to make so (look attach).
> > In Povray so it is impossible to make.
> > It is necessary to try to bend mesh before export to Povray.
> > For the static picture there are no problems. For this purpose there is a
> > 'Noise' button.
> > In case of animation - a problem.
> >
>
> I guess you are talking about deforming a mesh
>
> http://wiki.povray.org/content/User:Le_Forgeron#Getting_a_new_mesh_from_a_mesh
>
> It's not in official povray, but in hgpovray.
>
> Of particular interest, if I got the post right: warp & displace.
>
> I used warp to simulate the wind acting on a flag (moving the reproducible warp a
bit between each frame.
> As I was making a cycling animation, the movement was a rotation but any paths would
have do )

Thanks!
I use your version. But, I don't use exclusive options.
What works what doesn't work? There is no time to check and complain. :)))))
Because I receive similar outputs of the console

File '/tmp/Empty.pov' line 8: Parse Error: No matching } in 'texture',
 undeclared identifier 'voronoi' found instead
Fatal error in parser: Cannot parse input.
Render failed

In attachment blender procedural texture "clouds"
But, what equivalent in Povray?


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'clouds.jpg' (12 KB)

Preview of image 'clouds.jpg'
clouds.jpg


 

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.