|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi there!
When I recently tried to use some of the POVRay options for partial
rendering output (-SC, -EC, -SR, -ER), I experienced a strange
phenomenon - the selected rectangle was rendered correctly, but was
shifted to the upper edge of the (mainly black) output image (horizontal
position seemed ok). Furthermore, when trying to read a PNG thus created
using Java's imageio package, the program exited reporting an Exception.
(I apologize for not having written down the exact error message...
something like "ImageFormatException in PNGInputStream"...sorry!)
I wonder if anyone else has realized this or a similar issue. Or perhaps
somebody even knows how to circumvent this problem...?
Regards -
Torsten
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 16 May 2003 13:21:55 +0200, Torsten Crass <tor### [at] eBiologyde>
wrote:
> When I recently tried to use some of the POVRay options for partial
> rendering output (-SC, -EC, -SR, -ER), I experienced a strange
> phenomenon - the selected rectangle was rendered correctly, but was
> shifted to the upper edge of the (mainly black) output image (horizontal
> position seemed ok).
AFAIK it is expected behaviour. But perhaps I misunderstand your problem.
> Furthermore, when trying to read a PNG thus created
> using Java's imageio package, the program exited reporting an Exception.
> (I apologize for not having written down the exact error message...
> something like "ImageFormatException in PNGInputStream"...sorry!)
Verify with at least a few other applications reading of it. I would not trust
Java based application in bug reporting.
ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Christoph Hormann
Subject: Re: Corrupted partial rendering output?
Date: 16 May 2003 07:30:28
Message: <3EC4CBD4.B78277B2@gmx.de>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Torsten Crass wrote:
>
> Hi there!
>
> When I recently tried to use some of the POVRay options for partial
> rendering output (-SC, -EC, -SR, -ER), I experienced a strange
> phenomenon - [...]
See the threads:
Subject: Partial Output Options
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 11:07:03 EST
Newsgroups: povray.general
Subject: Povray writes wrong PNG image size info to partially rendered
images
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 00:18:40 -0500
From: "George Pantazopoulos" <the### [at] attbicom*KILLSPAM*>
Newsgroups: povray.general
Christoph
--
POV-Ray tutorials, include files, Sim-POV,
HCR-Edit and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/
Last updated 28 Feb. 2003 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi Christoph,
> See the threads:
thanks a lot, apparently I am not the only one... (Sorry for not having
discovered these threads before - but for some reason I didn't manage to
acces the web interface's search engine, so I used my newsreader to
check only the last 500 mails in a couple of groups...)
Anyway - be this the desired behaviour or not, I definitely agree that
it is worth being mentioned in section 5.2.2.1.2...
Thanks again, and a nice weekend -
Torsten
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
When making the PicPender.exe (the Program that puts the tiles together) I
found that problem.
If you just want to make those tiles into one Image, you can get the
SMPOV-Package and use picpend.exe for that.
Its an Windows-Executable and will put all those tiles properly into one
image.
Theo Gottwald
Tel. +49 ((0)7 21) 9 66 33-00
Fax +49 ((0)7 21) 9 66 33-99
E-Mail: the### [at] it-beraterorg
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Distributed Network-Rendering auf bis zu 600 PC's mit SMPOV und POV-Ray 3.5
Download ab sofort bei http://www.it-berater.org/smpov.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------
Distributed Network-Rendering or Local SMP-Rendering on all CPU's you have.
With SMPOV und
POV-Ray 3.5. & NEW: Mega-POV 1.0 * Download free at:
http://www.it-berater.org/smpov.htm
"Torsten Crass" <tor### [at] eBiologyde> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:3ec4c9d3$1@news.povray.org...
> Hi there!
>
> When I recently tried to use some of the POVRay options for partial
> rendering output (-SC, -EC, -SR, -ER), I experienced a strange
> phenomenon - the selected rectangle was rendered correctly, but was
> shifted to the upper edge of the (mainly black) output image (horizontal
> position seemed ok). Furthermore, when trying to read a PNG thus created
> using Java's imageio package, the program exited reporting an Exception.
> (I apologize for not having written down the exact error message...
> something like "ImageFormatException in PNGInputStream"...sorry!)
>
> I wonder if anyone else has realized this or a similar issue. Or perhaps
> somebody even knows how to circumvent this problem...?
>
> Regards -
>
> Torsten
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi Theo,
> If you just want to make those tiles into one Image, you can get the
> SMPOV-Package and use picpend.exe for that.
<sigh>No, just like many other people about which I read in the above
mentioned threads I nee to render different versions of a _small_ part
of the scene, so I thought using the partial output options and
overlaying a standard image with the resulting fragments would have been
a good idea... but apparently I was mistaken.</sigh> Maybe passing the
povray output through some tolerant image conversion program prior to
further Java-based processing might help...
Thanx anyway -
Torsten
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 16 May 2003 15:31:52 +0200, Torsten Crass <tor### [at] eBiologyde>
wrote:
> <sigh>No, just like many other people about which I read in the above
> mentioned threads I nee to render different versions of a _small_ part
> of the scene, so I thought using the partial output options and
> overlaying a standard image with the resulting fragments would have been
> a good idea... but apparently I was mistaken.</sigh> Maybe passing the
> povray output through some tolerant image conversion program prior to
> further Java-based processing might help...
There is a small solution to your needs. Instead of using something like:
+W100 +H100 +SC10 +EC90 +SR20 +ER30
use
+W80 +H10
with
"zoomin" include file with +SC.1 +EC.9 +SR.2 +ER.3
where zoomin include file can be found via
http://news.povray.org/search/?s=zoomin
(thought I never tried this way, for sure numbers needs recalculation to yours)
ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> "zoomin" include file with +SC.1 +EC.9 +SR.2 +ER.3
Hey, thanx!
That looks worth a try! :-)
Have a nice weekend, and happy rendering -
Torsten
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |