POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.off-topic : YouTube Server Time
29 Jul 2024 06:21:44 EDT (-0400)
  YouTube (Message 14 to 23 of 33)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>
From: Patrick Elliott
Subject: Re: YouTube
Date: 31 Jul 2012 17:03:55
Message: <5018483b$1@news.povray.org>
On 7/31/2012 4:48 AM, Invisible wrote:
> On 30/07/2012 09:54 PM, nemesis wrote:
>> watching hentai is as disturbing as watching any bizarre porn.
>
> You say that as if this stuff /isn't/ bizarre porn itself.
>

>> "Cowboy Bebop"
>> and a few others before dismissing the whole genre... but yeah,
>> there's enough

>> Disney-alike animation...
>
> Yeah, I think I'll give it a miss.
>
> I have no idea what is or is not "anime". I do know that occasionally
> films come on TV which have a distinctly Japanese look to them. And
> usually those are bizarre in the extreme as well...
Bebop, other than the ending, and the whole, man, these people are 
morons, and nothing ever really changes for them, theme, running through 
it, isn't too bad. Akira, I found real odd. Princess Mononoke was a bit 
better, but I prefer series myself.

Better bet might be something like Ghost in the Shell.


Post a reply to this message

From: Bill Pragnell
Subject: Re: YouTube
Date: 1 Aug 2012 03:25:01
Message: <web.5018d8fb3c69e2cf5b7d07940@news.povray.org>
Patrick Elliott <kag### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> Akira, I found real odd. Princess Mononoke was a bit
> better, but I prefer series myself.

Akira was good I thought, although the first version I ever saw (on VHS) was so
badly translated that I really had no chance of deconvolving the plot. I thought
Princess Mononoke was excellent, but then most of Miyazaki's work is excellent.
I have a soft spot for Nausicaa myself.

> Better bet might be something like Ghost in the Shell.

This. I just finished watching Stand Alone Complex, and I think it's one of the
best tv series of any genre/medium I've ever seen.

Also, I'd advise against Neon Genesis Evangelion as an introduction to anime ;-)

I am now trying to decide on what series to watch next...


Post a reply to this message

From: Darren New
Subject: Re: YouTube
Date: 3 Aug 2012 14:05:06
Message: <501c12d2@news.povray.org>
On 7/30/2012 18:07, nemesis wrote:
> All I know of "modern" animé is Pokémon and One Piece.  Those
 are terrible, I
> much prefer the oldies... :)

Does stuff like Speed Racer count as anime?

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   "Oh no! We're out of code juice!"
   "Don't panic. There's beans and filters
    in the cabinet."


Post a reply to this message

From: Patrick Elliott
Subject: Re: YouTube
Date: 4 Aug 2012 14:03:47
Message: <501d6403@news.povray.org>
On 8/3/2012 11:05 AM, Darren New wrote:
> On 7/30/2012 18:07, nemesis wrote:
>> All I know of "modern" animé is Pokémon and One Piece.  Those are
>> terrible, I
>> much prefer the oldies... :)
>
> Does stuff like Speed Racer count as anime?
>
New one, or older one? But, yeah. The older one is in the same art style 
as the recent Anime showing on adult swim, on the cartoon network - 
Cashern Sins.

A lot of the newer US stuff, including the newest teen Iron Man, I think 
would qualify, since its in the same artistic style, more or less. Most 
of the older US work isn't, because they seemed to try damn hard to make 
all the characters look even more crap than the really, really, old 
Anime did. lol


Post a reply to this message

From: Orchid Win7 v1
Subject: Re: YouTube
Date: 4 Aug 2012 14:21:47
Message: <501d683b$1@news.povray.org>
Every now and then, I do find something actually worth watching:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YjfapkWZrDQ

Or something utterly disturbing:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dh9lUjYQQ1w

I guess it isn't just Japan. o_O


Post a reply to this message

From: Darren New
Subject: Re: YouTube
Date: 4 Aug 2012 15:31:54
Message: <501d78aa$1@news.povray.org>
On 8/4/2012 11:03, Patrick Elliott wrote:
> On 8/3/2012 11:05 AM, Darren New wrote:
>> On 7/30/2012 18:07, nemesis wrote:
>>> All I know of "modern" animé is Pokémon and One Piece. Thos
e are
>>> terrible, I
>>> much prefer the oldies... :)
>>
>> Does stuff like Speed Racer count as anime?
>>
> New one, or older one?

I meant the original. I wasn't trying to be picky. I was just wondering i
f 
that counts as "anime" to most anime fans, or whether there really needed
 to 
be tentacles involved or something. :-)

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   "Oh no! We're out of code juice!"
   "Don't panic. There's beans and filters
    in the cabinet."


Post a reply to this message

From: clipka
Subject: Re: YouTube
Date: 4 Aug 2012 18:25:09
Message: <501da145$1@news.povray.org>
Am 04.08.2012 20:21, schrieb Orchid Win7 v1:
> Every now and then, I do find something actually worth watching:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YjfapkWZrDQ
>
> Or something utterly disturbing:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dh9lUjYQQ1w
>
> I guess it isn't just Japan. o_O

This related clip...:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6ejPG-i03I

... reminded me of this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ucgHMYf33Q


Post a reply to this message

From: Patrick Elliott
Subject: Re: YouTube
Date: 5 Aug 2012 14:52:24
Message: <501ec0e8$1@news.povray.org>
On 8/4/2012 12:31 PM, Darren New wrote:
> On 8/4/2012 11:03, Patrick Elliott wrote:
>> On 8/3/2012 11:05 AM, Darren New wrote:
>>> On 7/30/2012 18:07, nemesis wrote:
>>>> All I know of "modern" animé is Pokémon and One Piece. Those are
>>>> terrible, I
>>>> much prefer the oldies... :)
>>>
>>> Does stuff like Speed Racer count as anime?
>>>
>> New one, or older one?
>
> I meant the original. I wasn't trying to be picky. I was just wondering
> if that counts as "anime" to most anime fans, or whether there really
> needed to be tentacles involved or something. :-)
>
I think you are confusing Anime and Hentai. lol

And, the later only has tentacles in older, or those still following 
such conventions, ones, along with a lot of blurring, due to some idiot 
idea that its literally OK to show damn near anything other than 
genitals. How they can have special sex apps for phones to meet up for 
it, and some of the insane live shows they do, which involves sex in 
front of studio audiences, and still feel that they need to "blur" 
certain bits, is something I will never understand, at all. but, at 
least, for the most part, they are getting past the whole, "We can't 
show the guy at all, so... hmm, how are you are drawing tentacles?" :p


Post a reply to this message

From: Orchid Win7 v1
Subject: Re: YouTube
Date: 5 Aug 2012 17:07:28
Message: <501ee090$2@news.povray.org>
> How they can have special sex apps for phones to meet up for
> it, and some of the insane live shows they do, which involves sex in
> front of studio audiences, and still feel that they need to "blur"
> certain bits, is something I will never understand, at all.

I feel the same about the concept of "mech".


Post a reply to this message

From: Invisible
Subject: Re: YouTube
Date: 6 Aug 2012 05:50:43
Message: <501f9373$1@news.povray.org>
So the other day, I ended up watching a series of "fail" videos.

Now, while each video is undeniably a fail, some of them you honestly 
have to ask... what were you /expecting/ to happen? I mean, seriously, 
if this hadn't "gone wrong", what would it have even looked like?

I'll never find it again now, but there was one video which actually 
creased me up. OK, so there's a whole series of fails involving various 
sorts of motion sensors. You know the thing of thing; people throwing 
their Wii controllers through the TV screen, punching the person next to 
the in the face, hurting small children, etc. The summary is, /nobody/ 
has a palatial house like the ones you see in the adverts for these 
things, and it's really quite hazardous.

This particular video was special though. OK, so there's a guy at the 
end of a long corridor, dancing around in front of some sort of motion 
detector. (I'm presuming corridor since these things seem to only work 
if you stand ridiculously far back.) The camera appears to be balanced 
on top of the TV, so the guy is facing us.

"Dude, is it on?"
"Yeah, yeah, it's on."
"OK man, let's do it!"

So he starts jumping up and down, and flailing his arms and legs around. 
I have no idea what he's playing, but he's taking it fairly seriously.

And then, a few moments in, a cat wanders in. OK, so I think we all know 
where this is going. Obviously he's going to trip over the cat, or step 
on its tail or something. But no - he accidentally BOOTS THE CAT ACROSS 
THE ROOM. Just kicks it in the stomach and sends it flying. And I'm 
like, OMFG!

But he doesn't just kick it. The cat goes flying and CRASHES INTO THE 
FREAKING CAMERA! And this dude was standing, like, 20 feet away or 
something. And the camera ends up on its side, and we just see the cat 
say "mmmewwwwwwWWWW!" and run away.

That probably doesn't /sound/ very funny. But the whole thing happened 
in, like, 2 seconds flat. I spent about 20 minutes laughing my arse off 
at that. And I'm probably going to hell now...


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.