 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> I got more than 50% right I can't answer 1, 2 and 4.
Where are you from? The UK?
SPOILERS:
Did you slap your forehead when you looked up the answer to #1? As in, was
it so easy you didn't realize what they were asking? Or did you not know?
Hmmm... Do other countries have "bill of rights" as a marketing term? Around
here, we talk about "car buyer's bill of rights" and "airline passenger bill
of rights" and crap like that, but I wonder if such terminology has leaked
into other countries.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
I ordered stamps from Zazzle that read "Place Stamp Here".
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 09/17/09 11:33, Darren New wrote:
> whether it was a failing of the US education system, a failure of me to
> pay attention in those classes, or just normal for people not to know
> even the basics of the history of the other side of the world.
That presupposes that there is another side of the world.
--
ASCII and ye shall receive.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 09/17/09 17:02, Darren New wrote:
> Hmmm... Do other countries have "bill of rights" as a marketing term?
> Around here, we talk about "car buyer's bill of rights" and "airline
> passenger bill of rights" and crap like that, but I wonder if such
> terminology has leaked into other countries.
My guess is that in the UK, it's either the "note of rights" or the
"cheque of rights".
--
ASCII and ye shall receive.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:02:01 -0700, Darren New <dne### [at] san rrcom> wrote:
>Stephen wrote:
>> I got more than 50% right I can't answer 1, 2 and 4.
>
>Where are you from? The UK?
>
Aye
>SPOILERS:
>
>
>Did you slap your forehead when you looked up the answer to #1? As in, was
>it so easy you didn't realize what they were asking? Or did you not know?
I did not look it up. I do not understand the question. What does the term "the
supreme law of the land" mean?
>
>Hmmm... Do other countries have "bill of rights"
Yes the English Bill of Rights 1689 (An Act Declaring the Rights and Liberties
of the Subject and Settling the Succession of the Crown) and the Scottish Bill
of Rights (Claim of Right Act 1689) existed 100 years before yours :P
>as a marketing term? Around
>here, we talk about "car buyer's bill of rights" and "airline passenger bill
>of rights" and crap like that, but I wonder if such terminology has leaked
>into other countries.
Not here yet ;)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:22:27 -0500, Neeum Zawan <m.n### [at] ieeeorg> wrote:
>On 09/17/09 17:02, Darren New wrote:
>> Hmmm... Do other countries have "bill of rights" as a marketing term?
>> Around here, we talk about "car buyer's bill of rights" and "airline
>> passenger bill of rights" and crap like that, but I wonder if such
>> terminology has leaked into other countries.
>
> My guess is that in the UK, it's either the "note of rights" or the
>"cheque of rights".
Smarty :)
It could be called the "Lack of Rights" :)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> I did not look it up. I do not understand the question. What does the term "the
> supreme law of the land" mean?
Oh. The Constitution says in the text that it is the supreme law of the
land. If other laws are made that are in conflict with the Constitution, the
Constitution wins. If the Constitution says "You may not keep women from
voting", and some state passes a law that says women may not vote, that
state law is overruled by the supreme law of the land and is unenforcible.
> Yes the English Bill of Rights 1689 (An Act Declaring the Rights and Liberties
> of the Subject and Settling the Succession of the Crown) and the Scottish Bill
> of Rights (Claim of Right Act 1689) existed 100 years before yours :P
Cool. See what I meant? ;-)
> Not here yet ;)
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
I ordered stamps from Zazzle that read "Place Stamp Here".
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New wrote:
> Only one did I even have to hesitate and think about, and that's probably due
> to the current level of booze here.
Or the fact that they keep adding Justices? At least, that's the one I
got wrong.
...Chambers
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Neeum Zawan wrote:
> On 09/17/09 11:33, Darren New wrote:
>> whether it was a failing of the US education system, a failure of me to
>> pay attention in those classes, or just normal for people not to know
>> even the basics of the history of the other side of the world.
>
> That presupposes that there is another side of the world.
>
If there's only one side to the world, does that mean that it's a giant
Mobious strip? :)
...Chambers
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New wrote:
> http://www.news9.com/global/story.asp?s=11141949
>
> Summary: At least some places in America, children are utterly unworthy
> of living here. Ten US Citizenship questions at the bottom.
>
> I'm honestly curious how many people from Africa, Europe, and whatever
> else is represented here could answer the questions at the bottom. Only
> one did I even have to hesitate and think about, and that's probably due
> to the current level of booze here.
>
39% don't know what ocean is the US eastern seaboard? ROFL!
I would have passed barely. 6 correct
My wife, an actual American, got 7.
My daughter, a high schooler and fresh from civics class got 9. (Thought
there were 8 justices.)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
No, I could not. I'm not into politics and those questions are all about
politics. I knew about George Washington, though.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
