 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Darren New
Subject: Re: Now what am I going to store on this?
Date: 16 Apr 2008 11:10:51
Message: <480616fb@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Doctor John wrote:
> Now all we need is a 256-bit 3THz processor and we can start producing
> real time tracings at the same time as hunting for dark matter :-)
Now, is my math wrong, or would it take about 200 years to fill this up
at normal SATA disk speeds?
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
"That's pretty. Where's that?"
"It's the Age of Channelwood."
"We should go there on vacation some time."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Doctor John <doc### [at] gmail com> wrote:
>
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?view=DETAILS&grid=&xml=/earth/2008/04/15/sciipod115.xml
This is certainly not the first time I read news about some new
revolutionary technology which "will increase memory capacity/hard disk
sizes/CPU speeds/whatever a million-fold", yet nothing happened even after
several years. I have seen at least a dozen of those types of news during
the past decade, yet none of them has realized as promised.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 16 Apr 2008 11:12:45 -0400, Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
>
> This is certainly not the first time I read news about some new
>revolutionary technology which "will increase memory capacity/hard disk
>sizes/CPU speeds/whatever a million-fold", yet nothing happened even after
>several years. I have seen at least a dozen of those types of news during
>the past decade, yet none of them has realized as promised.
Bubble memory for one.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> Bubble memory for one.
Bubble memory actually did work, and was available as a plug-in card for
an Apple ][. Unfortunately, increasing storage a thousand-fold back
when you could buy bubble memory meant you could actually store as much
as a 3.5" floppy does! :-)
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
"That's pretty. Where's that?"
"It's the Age of Channelwood."
"We should go there on vacation some time."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:40:03 -0700, Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom>
wrote:
>Stephen wrote:
>> Bubble memory for one.
>
>Bubble memory actually did work, and was available as a plug-in card for
>an Apple ][. Unfortunately, increasing storage a thousand-fold back
>when you could buy bubble memory meant you could actually store as much
>as a 3.5" floppy does! :-)
Yes it just wasn't commercially viable.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> Doctor John <doc### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
>>
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?view=DETAILS&grid=&xml=/earth/2008/04/15/sciipod115.xml
>
> This is certainly not the first time I read news about some new
> revolutionary technology which "will increase memory capacity/hard disk
> sizes/CPU speeds/whatever a million-fold", yet nothing happened even after
> several years. I have seen at least a dozen of those types of news during
> the past decade, yet none of them has realized as promised.
>
So, how close are we sticking to Moore's Law atm?
(I can't be bothered to do the maths)
John
--
I will be brief but not nearly so brief as Salvador Dali, who gave the
world's shortest speech. He said, "I will be so brief I am already
finished," then he sat down.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> Bubble memory for one.
Or that guy who developed genetically engineered algae that responded to
electricity. The idea was that you could just "grow" your memory as
large as you wanted. Near-zero manufacture cost.
He never did quite get the prototype to work - but he came closer than
you might think...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:53:31 +0100, Orchid XP v8 <voi### [at] devnull>
wrote:
>Stephen wrote:
>
>> Bubble memory for one.
>
>Or that guy who developed genetically engineered algae that responded to
>electricity. The idea was that you could just "grow" your memory as
>large as you wanted. Near-zero manufacture cost.
>
>He never did quite get the prototype to work - but he came closer than
>you might think...
I did not hear about that
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Or that guy who developed genetically engineered algae that responded to
>> electricity. The idea was that you could just "grow" your memory as
>> large as you wanted. Near-zero manufacture cost.
>>
>> He never did quite get the prototype to work - but he came closer than
>> you might think...
>
> I did not hear about that
Yeah, apparently this guy discovered some algae that weakly respond to
electric currents. He grew them in the lab and engineered them such that
you could use a small laser to set or reset them, and a small electric
current to determine which state a given alga cell is currently in.
Obviously, a single living cell is pretty damn small, and they're
densely packed in 3D space, so - assuming you can get the laser to them
and wire them all up - *massive* storage capacity ensues.
I saw it on Tomorrow's World. (Remember that program? WHERE'S MY FLYING
CAR, BITCH!?!) Apparently nothing ever came of it.
OTOH, many people claimed that "electricity is just a fad" and "it will
never come to anything of signifigance". Sure, using green slime to
store computer data might *sound* crazy - but 10 years ago, a 750 GB
harddrive sounded pretty crazy...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:41:04 +0100, Orchid XP v8 <voi### [at] devnull>
wrote:
>
>I saw it on Tomorrow's World. (Remember that program? WHERE'S MY FLYING
>CAR, BITCH!?!) Apparently nothing ever came of it.
LOL
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
