Hi Warp,

> > 1. Support for Resolutions up to 12200x12200 at no extra cost.
>   Why such a low limitation? Some technical reason for that?
Just that I did not test higher Resolutions on my 1 GHz machine. If you need
more, just ask me
then you get a "eat on your own risk cake" for testing. It was really just
that I thought noone
would need more. For what do you need more? Theoretically I would say that
there is only a technical limitation in PicPender-2 for the output file to
be smaller then 2 GB :-) because thats the stringsize-limit.
This has to be tested if there is interest for that ...

> > 4. Still there is NO Spyware in SMPOV and it does NOT connect to the
> > Internet other then through a VPN.
>   I don't understand why this has to be explicitly said. This should be
> taken for granted (most importantly because I'm sure that distributing
> an adware version of POV-Ray would be outrageously against povlegal).
Since last version it has some "hardcoded advertisment" for my brothers
diving base
in Thailand. Besides that you are right, I would NEVER produce anything that
contains
Spyware (so long i don't get an contract from NSA for that :-))))). However
I really wanted to say that explicitly so everyone can be shure about that.
Also the fact that you know explicitly that SMPOV will NOT connect to the
internet
under no circumstances is something that is worth to be told.
For me, if I have such an statement, its more easy for me to trust the
program
as well as the author.



kind regards

Theo Gottwald

Tel. +49 ((0)721) 9 66 33-00

Fax  +49 ((0)721) 9 66 33-99

E-Mail: the### [at] it-beraterorg





--------------------------------------------

http://www.it-berater.org *

http://www.winrobots.de

Post a reply to this message

I got a reworked readme-file from Bob Hughes ( http://www.3digitaleyes.com )
thanks Bob all help is welcome!

And I added another small WinRobot to the distribution "Dr-SMPOV.exe".
This is a small Expert-Robot which will automatically check/correct all
Settings for
Local SMP-rendering if its started at the final location.

--Theo

Post a reply to this message

Great, thanks Theo! And you have another e-mail with the final readme.txt
file editing I think it will undergo, by me anyway. Should be fairly
printable, and some of us know how printed instructions can help.

Bob

Post a reply to this message

On 3 Jan 2004 18:41:08 -0500, Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
> distributing an adware version of POV-Ray

SMPOV is not version of POV-Ray.
Theo does not distribute any custom compile.

ABX

Post a reply to this message

Maybe its a mixing betwen an shell and a pipeline :-).

You put renderjobs in at the right side.
And on the other side it produces pictures using all the resources between.

Actually I changed something around the "times.log", so benchmarking is more
easy and more exact.
I plan to release a new web-site showing "how to save time with SMPOV" (and
how not :-).
This shall include some benchmarks.

Post a reply to this message

ABX <abx### [at] abxartpl> wrote:
> SMPOV is not version of POV-Ray.
> Theo does not distribute any custom compile.

  I see. Sorry for the confusion.

-- 
#macro N(D)#if(D>99)cylinder{M()#local D=div(D,104);M().5,2pigment{rgb M()}}
N(D)#end#end#macro M()<mod(D,13)-6mod(div(D,13)8)-3,10>#end blob{
N(11117333955)N(4254934330)N(3900569407)N(7382340)N(3358)N(970)}//  - Warp -

Post a reply to this message

You're welcome :-). I am quite happy that the POV-Ray community is so active
and so engaged
about these things.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------
Now to the news:

http://www.it-berater.org/shtmls/benchmark.shtml

is in a first version online. I think it should be intresting for everyone
who has been thinking about rendering things parallel, as it contains some
benchmarks with SMPOV, as well as theoretical conclusions on overhead and
rendering-time dependencies. Comments (especially on english grammar :-) are
welcome.

Post a reply to this message

In article <3ffab23f@news.povray.org>, Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> 
wrote:

> ABX <abx### [at] abxartpl> wrote:
> > SMPOV is not version of POV-Ray.
> > Theo does not distribute any custom compile.
> 
>   I see. Sorry for the confusion.

The name doesn't exactly make that clear...especially when **POV is such 
an established convention for custom POV versions. I guess it's too late 
to change now...

Still, the lack of spyware doesn't strike me as an "amazing" feature, 
and if it's really a *new* feature, meaning previous versions had 
spyware, then I will never use the software.

-- 
Christopher James Huff <cja### [at] earthlinknet>
http://home.earthlink.net/~cjameshuff/
POV-Ray TAG: <chr### [at] tagpovrayorg>
http://tag.povray.org/

Post a reply to this message

> Still, the lack of spyware doesn't strike me as an "amazing" feature,
> and if it's really a *new* feature, meaning previous versions had
> spyware, then I will never use the software.

May I excuse for my bad english once more, Chris.

None of my programms EVER included any spyware.
That is true also for ALL Programms and AddOns and WinRobots that are for
download on my WEB-Site.

For me personally before I download ANY piece of Software, I check if I find
a statement
if it is really free and does not make unwanted data exchange with the
Internet.

So I wanted to give this statement and noone must search for that. Doesn't
mean it was in there before.

As you can see also none of these programms ever asked for or did make a
connection to the internet.

Treat it like when MCDonals would say "None of our Burgers contain
snake-meat" :-).
Doesn't mean it was in there before.

--Theo
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Distributed Network-Rendering or Local SMP-Rendering. With SMPOV and
POV-Ray 3.5. * Download free at: http://www.it-berater.org/smpov.htm

> Still, the lack of spyware doesn't strike me as an "amazing" feature,
> and if it's really a *new* feature, meaning previous versions had
> spyware, then I will never use the software.
>
> -- 
> Christopher James Huff <cja### [at] earthlinknet>
> http://home.earthlink.net/~cjameshuff/
> POV-Ray TAG: <chr### [at] tagpovrayorg>
> http://tag.povray.org/

Post a reply to this message

In the last days, there have been quite a lot of small, mostly cosmetic
changes to SMPOV.

Besides all those changes there were 2 annoying bugs, 99% of all users never
would have come to the point that they happen (this appeared under testing
conditions).

However today these 2 last things (e.g. RenderJob left in Que, RenderAgent
takes 99% CPU)
have been corrected, so I recommend anyone to upgrade now to 3.70 and report
me if there are
 any other things especially I would like to get experiences from users in
bigger networks.

--Theo
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Distributed Network-Rendering or Local SMP-Rendering. With SMPOV and
POV-Ray 3.5. * Download free at: http://www.it-berater.org/smpov.htm

Post a reply to this message