|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
[GDS|Entropy] <gds### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> I still like C#/ASP.NET for it. ;-)
Note that the server might very well run on linux (if not even another
flavor of unix). That means C#/ASP is probably out of question.
(Even if it was running on Windows, I think it would still be a good
idea to make the code portable so that it can be transferred to a linux
box if necessary.)
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"[GDS|Entropy]" <gds### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> I still like C#/ASP.NET for it. ;-)
> PHP is nice too, just different.
all of them suck very much. I wish ruby or python were far more widespread with
their respective and amazing web toolkits...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"John VanSickle" <evi### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:47aba535@news.povray.org...
> PASSENGER: How long until this train leaves?
>
> CONDUCTOR: That depends.
>
> PASSENGER: Depends on what?
>
> CONDUCTOR: That, also, depends.
>
> --
>
> It has been over a year since activity took place on the IRTC.
> If the old admin won't come back and do the admin thing,
> replacement is long overdue.
>
> If the admin, in spite of his/her/its inactivity, cannot be
> replaced, the reasons therefore need to be made known to the IRTC
> community.
>
> If the IRTC is dead and cannot be brought back, the time has come
> to make it official.
>
> Regards,
> John
me too
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> Note that the server might very well run on linux (if not even another
> flavor of unix). That means C#/ASP is probably out of question.
http://www.mono-project.com/ASP.NET
Never used ASP myself (not into web stuff). Mono works great, though.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> Note that the server might very well run on linux (if not even another
> flavor of unix). That means C#/ASP is probably out of question.
Actually, I understand that's the one thing that Mono *is* very
compatible with, because it doesn't really have to touch any system
libraries like windowing stuff. I've read you don't even need to
recompile pages.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
On what day did God create the body thetans?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
[GDS|Entropy] wrote:
> I still like C#/ASP.NET for it. ;-)
We use PHP, and the POVCOMP code is written in it. The server runs Apache 2
on FreeBSD.
If, however, as a few in this thread have suggested, it is possible to run
C#/ASP.NET on a Linux system I would be happy to set this up, and in fact
would even be quite interested in seeing if it would work well. I am not a
great fan of PHP, even though it's used extensively throughout the POV
site. (Basically I don't mind it but I would welcome something better).
-- Chris
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Chris Cason <del### [at] deletethistoopovrayorg> wrote:
> [GDS|Entropy] wrote:
> > I still like C#/ASP.NET for it. ;-)
> I am not a
> great fan of PHP, even though it's used extensively throughout the POV
> site. (Basically I don't mind it but I would welcome something better).
ruby and rails?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hello,
While I have never attempted to use the .NET framework on linux, I
understand it is possible, and seems to be growing in popularity.
Hell, I'd be willing to give it a shot.
Like I said, I am more than willing to throw in my share of code on this.
I *do* have most of the code needed for the features I laid out sitting on
my hdd in chunks right now from other projects and web apps I've built.
Note that I do not want to be the only one working on this though!
(bathed in gastly light from the baleful eye of the entire pov community)
:-D
It would be nice to get a few devs together and establish some sort of
consensus on the lang/platform/db/framework to be used(*without* infinite
debate), and throw some code together in a quick/dirty/small proof of
concept, and then go from there. Sort of a feasibility study.
You know where I am going with the operation of the site, and know where my
vote is cast.
I can be of most use to the project if it uses .NET, but honestly I don't
even care if the app is written in sumerian slashed into the burning flesh
of the damned by Abezithibod himself...
I just want the IRTC back and wouldn't at all mind helping. :-p
So whats next? :-)
Ian
"Chris Cason" <del### [at] deletethistoopovrayorg> wrote in
message news:47afa4a2$1@news.povray.org...
> [GDS|Entropy] wrote:
>> I still like C#/ASP.NET for it. ;-)
>
> We use PHP, and the POVCOMP code is written in it. The server runs Apache
> 2
> on FreeBSD.
>
> If, however, as a few in this thread have suggested, it is possible to run
> C#/ASP.NET on a Linux system I would be happy to set this up, and in fact
> would even be quite interested in seeing if it would work well. I am not a
> great fan of PHP, even though it's used extensively throughout the POV
> site. (Basically I don't mind it but I would welcome something better).
>
> -- Chris
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
[GDS|Entropy] wrote:
> So whats next? :-)
If I may...
What problem are we trying to address that the TC-RTC does not? You can
certainly argue that the TC-RTC is a step backwards from the IRTC in
some ways--but I don't see anyone arguing that. People are just
pretending that the TC-RTC doesn't exist.
Is the problem that the TC-RTC has a name that starts with TC instead of I?
--
William Tracy
afi### [at] gmailcom -- wtr### [at] calpolyedu
There are no problems which cannot be solved by judicious use of high
explosives.
-- British commando, circa WWII
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi, (nice forest macro, by the way..it looks great)
I intend no offense to the TC-RTC, and wish to avoid tertiary debate, but I
do feel the need to state you made a very good case for the re-animation of
the IRTC:
>People are just pretending that the TC-RTC doesn't exist.
That is a big problem. If people will not use something for any number of
reasons it should/must be replaced.
I didn't even know the TC-RTC existed, its bookmarked now, but the above
point is still very valid.
Additionally:
>What problem are we trying to address that the TC-RTC does not? You can
>certainly argue that the TC-RTC is a step backwards from the IRTC in some
>ways
There are many RTCs out there, I guess its just a matter of exposure, niche
and user preference.
Perhaps the TC-RTC is a step back, I don't know. I'll trust you there.
In the end, since we *can* ressurect the IRTC with improvements, and people
*would* use it and *do* want it back ....I say, why not?
:-D
However I guess you could put a poll on the povray and/or irtc homepage.
Ian
"William Tracy" <wtr### [at] calpolyedu> wrote in message
news:47aff755$1@news.povray.org...
> [GDS|Entropy] wrote:
>> So whats next? :-)
>
> If I may...
>
> What problem are we trying to address that the TC-RTC does not? You can
> certainly argue that the TC-RTC is a step backwards from the IRTC in some
> ways--but I don't see anyone arguing that. People are just pretending that
> the TC-RTC doesn't exist.
>
> Is the problem that the TC-RTC has a name that starts with TC instead of
> I?
>
> --
> William Tracy
> afi### [at] gmailcom -- wtr### [at] calpolyedu
>
> There are no problems which cannot be solved by judicious use of high
> explosives.
> -- British commando, circa WWII
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |