 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Just posted a new page with four recent animations - all 100% POV. If you
don't have a fast connection, probably not worth the trouble.
http://www.dennismiller.neu.edu/animation.html
Comments welcome!
Best,
D.
--
dhm### [at] attbi com
http://www.dennismiller.neu.edu
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
How about using a video format which is a bit less closed? Even a DivX avi
would have been better (I can play those in this Sparc Solaris, and at home
I don't have realplayer installed simply because I have severely averse
feelings towards it).
--
#macro N(D)#if(D>99)cylinder{M()#local D=div(D,104);M().5,2pigment{rgb M()}}
N(D)#end#end#macro M()<mod(D,13)-6mod(div(D,13)8)-3,10>#end blob{
N(11117333955)N(4254934330)N(3900569407)N(7382340)N(3358)N(970)}// - Warp -
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message news:3e48d138@news.povray.org...
> I don't have realplayer installed simply because I have severely averse
> feelings towards it).
Feelings? The damn thing tries to take over the world everytime I let it near my
PC...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
They look very interesting, I would love to download them. But
Realplayer..... no... I have it (although I also have averse feelings to it)
but my connection is not fast enough, and when I scroll back to see
something that was already downloaded, it tries to download it again.. That
way, I just won't be able to play the file.. I tried to download to my
harddisk but it doesn't work. Maybe it would be possible with a download
manager, but I don't have one.
Regards,
Hugo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sorry for the inconvenience. I will put up some MPEG 1 versions but with the
tests I have done, DivX doesn';t retain enough of the color and the motion
is not very smooth. Let me see what else will work.
D.
"Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message
news:3e48d138@news.povray.org...
> How about using a video format which is a bit less closed? Even a DivX
avi
> would have been better (I can play those in this Sparc Solaris, and at
home
> I don't have realplayer installed simply because I have severely averse
> feelings towards it).
>
> --
> #macro N(D)#if(D>99)cylinder{M()#local D=div(D,104);M().5,2pigment{rgb
M()}}
> N(D)#end#end#macro M()<mod(D,13)-6mod(div(D,13)8)-3,10>#end blob{
> N(11117333955)N(4254934330)N(3900569407)N(7382340)N(3358)N(970)}// -
Warp -
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I guess you're not using it properly then. Though I
haven't encoded any divx-video myself yet, the kind
of video I have seen look lossless, colorwise and
artifact-wise.
No offense meant, but why else should DIVX be so
high in demand, if not for those reasons?
--
Tim Nikias
Homepage: http://www.digitaltwilight.de/no_lights/index.html
Email: Tim### [at] gmxde
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I don't like realplayer as well, much like I don't
like the the new Quicktime. Those damn background
programms are simply annoying and not really suited
for CPU-intensive tasks...
--
Tim Nikias
Homepage: http://www.digitaltwilight.de/no_lights/index.html
Email: Tim### [at] gmxde
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Tim Nikias" <tim### [at] gmxde> wrote in message
news:3e490462@news.povray.org...
> like the the new Quicktime. Those damn background
Quicktime is the one program that reliably screws up my win2k sessions - it
garbles all my icons (incl. the min/max/close buttons) when I run it, and only a
reboot fixes it.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In povray.general Tim Nikias <tim### [at] gmxde> wrote:
> I guess you're not using it properly then. Though I
> haven't encoded any divx-video myself yet, the kind
> of video I have seen look lossless, colorwise and
> artifact-wise.
DivX is in no way lossless. You need a rather large bitrate in order
to get such high quality that artifacts are not seen.
However, the advantage of DivX (and every MPEG-4 codec in general) is
that you need a whole lot less bitrate to get a good-quality image than
with MPEG-1.
--
#macro N(D)#if(D>99)cylinder{M()#local D=div(D,104);M().5,2pigment{rgb M()}}
N(D)#end#end#macro M()<mod(D,13)-6mod(div(D,13)8)-3,10>#end blob{
N(11117333955)N(4254934330)N(3900569407)N(7382340)N(3358)N(970)}// - Warp -
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Well I don't really have any interest in distributing this stuff over the
Web, so I haven't explored all the options in any of the encoders. - I just
put up the links and mentioned it here so the Group could have a look.
Mostly the stuff goes out on DV or DVD. Maybe in a few years the whole
compression discussion will be moot!
D.
"Tim Nikias" <tim### [at] gmxde> wrote in message
news:3e490417$1@news.povray.org...
> I guess you're not using it properly then. Though I
> haven't encoded any divx-video myself yet, the kind
> of video I have seen look lossless, colorwise and
> artifact-wise.
> No offense meant, but why else should DIVX be so
> high in demand, if not for those reasons?
>
> --
> Tim Nikias
> Homepage: http://www.digitaltwilight.de/no_lights/index.html
> Email: Tim### [at] gmxde
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
