 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 4-8-2013 0:49, MichaelJF wrote:
> Yes, and sometimes one has to enjoy life ;-) Borrowed a lot from Gill and
> eMirage (lily from eMirage (BlendSwap), water and rubber duck from Gill Tran)
> here is a first wip.
In these days of hot weather, this is exactly what we need :-)
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 03/08/2013 11:49 PM, MichaelJF wrote:
> Stephen <mca### [at] aol com> wrote:
>> LOL I know that feeling.
>
> Yes, and sometimes one has to enjoy life ;-) Borrowed a lot from Gill and
> eMirage (lily from eMirage (BlendSwap), water and rubber duck from Gill Tran)
> here is a first wip.
>
A cross between Monet, Hockney and Florentijn Hofman. :-)
Well composed and executed. But I hope that the pond is nowhere near
your volcano. ;-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 04.08.2013 08:57, schrieb Thomas de Groot:
> On 4-8-2013 0:49, MichaelJF wrote:
>> Yes, and sometimes one has to enjoy life ;-) Borrowed a lot from Gill and
>> eMirage (lily from eMirage (BlendSwap), water and rubber duck from
>> Gill Tran)
>> here is a first wip.
>
> In these days of hot weather, this is exactly what we need :-)
+1
Makes me want to jump right into my display.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"MichaelJF" <mi-### [at] t-onlinede> wrote:
> Yes, and sometimes one has to enjoy life ;-) Borrowed a lot from Gill and
> eMirage (lily from eMirage (BlendSwap), water and rubber duck from Gill Tran)
> here is a first wip.
"Rubber Ducky, you're the one
You make bath time lots of fun
Rubber Ducky, I'm awfully fond of you.
Every day when I make my way to my tubby
I find a little fellow who's cute and yellow and chubby
Rub-a-dub dubby."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 04.08.2013 18:15, schrieb Cousin Ricky:
> "MichaelJF" <mi-### [at] t-onlinede> wrote:
>> Yes, and sometimes one has to enjoy life ;-) Borrowed a lot from Gill and
>> eMirage (lily from eMirage (BlendSwap), water and rubber duck from Gill Tran)
>> here is a first wip.
>
> "Rubber Ducky, you're the one
> You make bath time lots of fun
> Rubber Ducky, I'm awfully fond of you.
>
> Every day when I make my way to my tubby
> I find a little fellow who's cute and yellow and chubby
> Rub-a-dub dubby."
Sesame Street, I presume?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> A cross between Monet, Hockney and Florentijn Hofman. :-)
>
> Well composed and executed. But I hope that the pond is nowhere near
> your volcano. ;-)
If the pond is to the south east, it is safe. None of my five simulations run
into this direction. But one shall not trust them in RL.
The pool was by Gill Tran. My vulcano is still running since I decided to start
over again. Seems I mixed up some things working on more than one machine. But
first results yield old problems. It is running now with +wt6 to give me some
performance for other issues. At the moment I'm at a day rendering time with
that.
Fortunatelly the ducks are rendering faster. And I changed the one or other
thing here. First I removed Gills Water and replaced it by an own water
isosurface I created after the advices of Chris Hormanns water tutorial I read
some years ago.
Second I switched to a HDRI lighting using Jaimes patio.hdr.
Third I replaced Gill's rubber ducks by my own, but at the moment I still use
Gill's textures for them. An afternoon with Wings...
This will be the last WIP of this interim image. I only will think a bit about
the textures of the little beasts and add some focal blur for the final.
May be I will have one of them wearing sun glasses.
But this one was a lot fun.
Best regards,
Michael
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'rubberducks20130804b.png' (1103 KB)
Preview of image 'rubberducks20130804b.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
One of two final alternatives. This has some obvious flaws especially to the
left. In some areas I got more density but in other areas I lost density
completely. The other one will come within the evening. Rendering time was more
than 4 days, so revisions are not possible.
Best regards,
Michael
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download '20130811pyroflow_tc.png' (1502 KB)
Preview of image '20130811pyroflow_tc.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 16/08/2013 7:12 AM, MichaelJF wrote:
> One of two final alternatives. This has some obvious flaws especially to the
> left. In some areas I got more density but in other areas I lost density
> completely. The other one will come within the evening. Rendering time was more
> than 4 days, so revisions are not possible.
>
It certainly gives the impression of a violent explosion. Well done and
with just under two days to go before you hit the deadline. Your other
render will be ready, too.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> On 16/08/2013 7:12 AM, MichaelJF wrote:
> > One of two final alternatives. This has some obvious flaws especially to the
> > left. In some areas I got more density but in other areas I lost density
> > completely. The other one will come within the evening. Rendering time was more
> > than 4 days, so revisions are not possible.
> >
>
> It certainly gives the impression of a violent explosion. Well done and
> with just under two days to go before you hit the deadline. Your other
> render will be ready, too.
>
> --
> Regards
> Stephen
Thank you very much.
Here is the alternative image. With this one you cannot see the flaws (which are
still present). But it looks to less explosive IMO. If you have a suggestion
what to enter into the contest I will consider this.
Best regards,
Michael
(and I revealed the meaning of JF finally;-)
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download '20130812pyroflow_tc.png' (1351 KB)
Preview of image '20130812pyroflow_tc.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 16/08/2013 5:41 PM, MichaelJF wrote:
> If you have a suggestion
> what to enter into the contest I will consider this.
That is a hard one. I thought initially that the second one had nicer
clouds but I forgot that it is an eruption so the violence of the first
is more appropriate, I think. ;-)
Also the artefacts on the second are more obvious, to my eyes.
Never the less, very well done.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
