![](/i/fill.gif) |
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Can't read file
JC
--
http://exether.free.fr/irtc (more IRTC stats !)
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
You could save even more bandwidth by posting just a link to wherever you
choose to upload the file.
--
light_source{9+9*x,1}camera{orthographic look_at(1-y)/4angle 30location
9/4-z*4}light_source{-9*z,1}union{box{.9-z.1+x clipped_by{plane{2+y-4*x
0}}}box{z-y-.1.1+z}box{-.1.1+x}box{.1z-.1}pigment{rgb<.8.2,1>}}//Jellby
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Jellby wrote:
> You could save even more bandwidth by posting just a link to wherever you
> choose to upload the file.
Or not posting at all ... :-)
Oouppss I've been trolling here ...
JC
--
http://exether.free.fr/irtc (more IRTC stats !)
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"LightBeam" <s.f### [at] tiscali fr> wrote in message
news:404b93f0@news.povray.org...
> With wich programm can I see it please ?!
This is the second time this happened -- a file that isn't "common" enough
to read. There's all kinds of software out there -- howzabout we make a FAQ
and page for this group that links to that software so we can all get
up-to-date? I totally understand the desire to show these images in the way
they were intended to be shown and it's all just a matter of software. If I
knew where to find this stuff, I'd put it up myself (that, and if I was just
a little bit less lazy) ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 23:00:27 +0100, Jellby <jel### [at] M-yahoo com>
wrote:
>You could save even more bandwidth by posting just a link to wherever you
>choose to upload the file.
I'd still get some saying they could not see the file after following
the link - so thanks for the suggestion, but it's not going to solve
that particular problem.
--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Sun, 7 Mar 2004 16:08:44 -0600, "Dan P" <dan### [at] yahoo com>
wrote:
>"LightBeam" <s.f### [at] tiscali fr> wrote in message
>news:404b93f0@news.povray.org...
>> With wich programm can I see it please ?!
>
>This is the second time this happened -- a file that isn't "common" enough
>to read. There's all kinds of software out there -- howzabout we make a FAQ
>and page for this group that links to that software so we can all get
>up-to-date? I totally understand the desire to show these images in the way
>they were intended to be shown and it's all just a matter of software. If I
>knew where to find this stuff, I'd put it up myself (that, and if I was just
>a little bit less lazy) ;-)
Well if you cross your fingers extra-hard, the FAQ controllers might
stir. But I'd not get your hopes up.
>
--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"IMBJR" <no### [at] spam here> wrote in message
news:b38n4094p4s07mpl7eqhsaoch3kos8pgeg@4ax.com...
<snip />
> >This is the second time this happened -- a file that isn't "common"
enough
> >to read. There's all kinds of software out there -- howzabout we make a
FAQ
> >and page for this group that links to that software so we can all get
> >up-to-date? I totally understand the desire to show these images in the
way
> >they were intended to be shown and it's all just a matter of software. If
I
> >knew where to find this stuff, I'd put it up myself (that, and if I was
just
> >a little bit less lazy) ;-)
>
> Well if you cross your fingers extra-hard, the FAQ controllers might
> stir. But I'd not get your hopes up.
I don't blame them either -- Google's my home page after all :-)
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
I try not to install software I don't need. So could someone give an honest
opinion as to whether these pictures are good enough to justify downloading a
viewer?
There seem to have been 3 conversations about JPEG2000 and nobody's yet said if
the pictures are any good! :)
--
Tek
www.evilsuperbrain.com
"IMBJR" <no### [at] spam here> wrote in message
news:nn2n4094eg36ee7ig8jljv9r5bf71r3mcj@4ax.com...
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Sun, 7 Mar 2004 14:32:39 -0800, "Tek" <tek### [at] evilsuperbrain com>
wrote:
>I try not to install software I don't need. So could someone give an honest
>opinion as to whether these pictures are good enough to justify downloading a
>viewer?
Honest? Dear me - that's impossible. How can one be honest about such
things?
And ...
Can you really expect honesty from these people after I have had to
deal with them?
There will even less chance of objectivity now.
>
>There seem to have been 3 conversations about JPEG2000 and nobody's yet said if
>the pictures are any good! :)
Well I like them - they are nothing special though. Merely experiments
with isosurfaces that I had to satisfy myself with and one involving a
Poser model slice up.
As for getting a viewer that supports it, of course I would suggest
yes - get one. But if you feel happier about not doing so because of
your software-installation policy, then go with what makes you happy.
No one's forcing you do get this facility - it's merely a "suggested
serving".
--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
> Can you really expect honesty from these people after I have had to
> deal with them?
Well I'm talking to the ones who've actually bothered downloading the viewer, so
they're probably not biased against you ;)
> No one's forcing you do get this facility - it's merely a "suggested
> serving".
Absolutely, I appreciate the suggestion. I tend to only install stuff if I know
I want it for some purpose, so if I start finding more jp2 files I'm sure I'll
get something that can handle them.
--
Tek
www.evilsuperbrain.com
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |