 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 25/04/2011 11:28 AM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
> On 04/25/2011 06:37 AM, Stephen wrote:
>> On 25/04/2011 8:28 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>>> I think maybe one human figure is needed, but in the distance, imo in
>>> the
>>> first arch of the second tier...
>>
>> I think that, that position it would be hardly noticeable. Too small and
>> too dark. I was having trouble putting this model in the shade due to
>> using radiosity and no ambient. But then maybe subtlety is the way to go.
>>
>
> Not too bad there Stephen ... fairly close to what I'd imagined.
It is only a first pass to get an idea.
> I thought the figure fairly close to the camera (as if the view was that
> of the character) ...
The problem with that is that the camera is in the shadow and little
radiosity light gets to the model. So this image has 3 fill lights
(including a back light to show the translucence of the dress, which
doesn't work). You can see the the shadows are too deep and mesh
artefacts show up. I can subdivide the dress but, later.
> arms out either holding an orb of sorts (logo
> encased in the orb) or reaching towards the courtyard with the
> appearance of holding or reaching for the logo/sculpture that Rob is
> working on.
I would need the rough dimensions of the orb to get the hands right and
the apparent weight to gauge how far back she was leaning to balance it.
Collaborations are not easy.
When I can get all the image files together I'll post the include file
for you and others to play with.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'ndi_1.jpg' (104 KB)
Preview of image 'ndi_1.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 25/04/2011 11:54 AM, Stephen wrote:
> So this image has 3 fill lights
In a light group.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Holsenback <jho### [at] povray org> wrote:
> On 04/25/2011 02:58 AM, Samuel Benge wrote:
> > It's looking great, Jim! The light_source might need some brightening. I usually
> > like to have a full range of values in a scene, from near black to almost pure
> > white, if possible.
>
> the radiosity is doing a fairly decent job pulling in the darker areas,
> so I'm thinking one light source may be enough ... wonder if Trevor has
> been following this thread. He's tops in lighting so maybe he can offer
> an opinion about what our next lighting move might be.
I wasn't suggesting more light_sources, just increasing the intensity of the
sunlight a bit. But with that new female character holding the povlogo, the
light level will look alright :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 25/04/2011 7:51 PM, Samuel Benge wrote:
> But with that new female character holding the povlogo
I've uploaded it to p.b.Misc (5 Meg)
New model with Orb if wanted.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'ndi_1a.jpg' (118 KB)
Preview of image 'ndi_1a.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 04/25/2011 04:29 PM, Stephen wrote:
> On 25/04/2011 7:51 PM, Samuel Benge wrote:
>> But with that new female character holding the povlogo
>
> I've uploaded it to p.b.Misc (5 Meg)
> New model with Orb if wanted.
>
>
Awesome mate! I can't wait to fit this into the scene. I've made some
strides with the lighting and radiosity ... LOL I just /might/ be able
to dial that in myself ;-) ... I just finished what looks like the last
of the positional fine tuning, but I looks like I'm in for some long
render times from now, so hang tough and I'll do my best.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
It seems that soon will be required the presence of the Divine checkered plane.
No seriously, how about an ivy on the back wall? Thomas Luft developed a
wonderful tool for this task at his site:
http://graphics.uni-konstanz.de/~luft/ivy_generator/
Greetings
B. Gimeno
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Stephen" <mcavoys_at@aoldotcom> schreef in bericht
news:4db540ce@news.povray.org...
> I think that, that position it would be hardly noticeable. Too small and
> too dark. I was having trouble putting this model in the shade due to
> using radiosity and no ambient. But then maybe subtlety is the way to go.
Yes, I think you are right. The scale of the architecture fools my eyes...
Your model is going to be alright in this scene!~
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 25/04/2011 10:57 PM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
> Awesome mate! I can't wait to fit this into the scene.
If you like it, it might be better if I gave you the OBJ file so that
you could subdivide the dress if needed. Also I think that I overdid the
wind (she looks as if she is wearing a bustle) so I will redo it.
Do you want any particular facial expression?
When you have decided on the position of the model in the scene I could
make her look at a POI. (?)
> I've made some
> strides with the lighting and radiosity ... LOL I just /might/ be able
> to dial that in myself ;-) ...
I found out that you can't use a default texture with an ambient of 1 in
the scene. It took me ages to find out what was wrong with it.
> I just finished what looks like the last
> of the positional fine tuning, but I looks like I'm in for some long
> render times from now, so hang tough and I'll do my best.
As long as it's done before the release. ;-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> > But with that new female character holding the povlogo
Can we please stay out of the uncanny valley?
Especially the stereotypically misogynist box canyon of female impersonators.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Jim Holsenback" <jho### [at] povrayorg> schreef in bericht
news:4db54a67$1@news.povray.org...
> yep ... a pigeon or two sounds like a good idea!
Always difficult to catch those rogues... ;-)
The corresponding files can be found in p.t.s-f
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'PoserFiguretest.png' (412 KB)
Preview of image 'PoserFiguretest.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
