 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 6/28/2011 11:50 AM, posfan12 wrote:
> On 4/10/2011 8:38 AM, Le_Forgeron wrote:
>> See p.general : a challenge of sorts
>>
>> Recreating the image (provided scene is free of rights, update& change
>> as you wants)
>>
>> There is room for improvements.
>>
>> comment the arealight's line for a very quicker render (but stronger
>> shadows)
>
> The scene looks dated, IMO. Maybe we could come up with something new?
>
Oops, mail reader didn't catch up with the entire thread before I posted.
--
http://isometricland.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 28.06.2011 16:33, schrieb Jim Holsenback:
> Before I decide if I want to develop this approach and further I figured
> I'd post to see what kind of reaction I get ;-)
Freakin' cool mood!
What's that bright thing in the lower right though? You didn't use
diffuse on the reflecting plate, did you? That would be far from
realistic for a polished surface.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 06/29/2011 11:42 PM, clipka wrote:
> Am 28.06.2011 16:33, schrieb Jim Holsenback:
>> Before I decide if I want to develop this approach and further I figured
>> I'd post to see what kind of reaction I get ;-)
>
> Freakin' cool mood!
>
> What's that bright thing in the lower right though? You didn't use
> diffuse on the reflecting plate, did you? That would be far from
> realistic for a polished surface.
the bright spot in lwr right is the light source reaching that far into
the room, since it intercepts the reflecting plate just a little I might
be able to transform the light source just a bit ... the texture on the
slab is one of the copper definitions from metals.inc with a little
emission in place of the ambient term
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 30.06.2011 11:12, schrieb Jim Holsenback:
> the bright spot in lwr right is the light source reaching that far into
> the room, since it intercepts the reflecting plate just a little I might
> be able to transform the light source just a bit ... the texture on the
> slab is one of the copper definitions from metals.inc with a little
> emission in place of the ambient term
Emission? Don't!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Le 2011/06/30 05:12, Jim Holsenback a écrit :
> On 06/29/2011 11:42 PM, clipka wrote:
>> Am 28.06.2011 16:33, schrieb Jim Holsenback:
>>> Before I decide if I want to develop this approach and further I figured
>>> I'd post to see what kind of reaction I get ;-)
>>
>> Freakin' cool mood!
>>
>> What's that bright thing in the lower right though? You didn't use
>> diffuse on the reflecting plate, did you? That would be far from
>> realistic for a polished surface.
>
> the bright spot in lwr right is the light source reaching that far into
> the room, since it intercepts the reflecting plate just a little I might
> be able to transform the light source just a bit ... the texture on the
> slab is one of the copper definitions from metals.inc with a little
> emission in place of the ambient term
Emission for a metallic texture? Yuch!
The ambient terms in those texture are hugly and dirty kludges to make
them look acceptable when there is no environment.
Metals, unless hot enough, never emit any light, they reflect it.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 06/30/2011 06:07 PM, Alain wrote:
> Le 2011/06/30 05:12, Jim Holsenback a écrit :
>> On 06/29/2011 11:42 PM, clipka wrote:
>>> Am 28.06.2011 16:33, schrieb Jim Holsenback:
>>>> Before I decide if I want to develop this approach and further I
>>>> figured
>>>> I'd post to see what kind of reaction I get ;-)
>>>
>>> Freakin' cool mood!
>>>
>>> What's that bright thing in the lower right though? You didn't use
>>> diffuse on the reflecting plate, did you? That would be far from
>>> realistic for a polished surface.
>>
>> the bright spot in lwr right is the light source reaching that far into
>> the room, since it intercepts the reflecting plate just a little I might
>> be able to transform the light source just a bit ... the texture on the
>> slab is one of the copper definitions from metals.inc with a little
>> emission in place of the ambient term
>
> Emission for a metallic texture? Yuch!
> The ambient terms in those texture are hugly and dirty kludges to make
> them look acceptable when there is no environment.
>
> Metals, unless hot enough, never emit any light, they reflect it.
LOL ... ok you guys, I get the message ;-) I must've been thinking of
something else, I checked and I have both ambient/emission set to zero
... although setting the ambient term is moot because radiosity
effectively sets it to zero.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 30.06.2011 23:12, schrieb Jim Holsenback:
>> Metals, unless hot enough, never emit any light, they reflect it.
>
> LOL ... ok you guys, I get the message ;-) I must've been thinking of
> something else, I checked and I have both ambient/emission set to zero
> .... although setting the ambient term is moot because radiosity
> effectively sets it to zero.
Good boy ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 06/28/2011 12:50 PM, posfan12 wrote:
> On 4/10/2011 8:38 AM, Le_Forgeron wrote:
>> See p.general : a challenge of sorts
>>
>> Recreating the image (provided scene is free of rights, update& change
>> as you wants)
>>
>> There is room for improvements.
>>
>> comment the arealight's line for a very quicker render (but stronger
>> shadows)
>
> The scene looks dated, IMO. Maybe we could come up with something new?
>
How's this for a different approach ... I actually like this! It's just
an intersection slice of the distribution logo repeated using an
adaptation of the helix solution that Le_Forgeron posted a while ago.The
text and "helix-logo" object are textured together so the text gets it's
pigment from the depth position. The background uses Sam's OTO (Odd
Tiles Object) macro. Comments appreciated.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'ndi.png' (728 KB)
Preview of image 'ndi.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>Jim Holsenback on date 10/07/2011 16:43 wrote:
> How's this for a different approach ... I actually like this! It's just
> an intersection slice of the distribution logo repeated using an
> adaptation of the helix solution that Le_Forgeron posted a while ago.The
> text and "helix-logo" object are textured together so the text gets it's
> pigment from the depth position. The background uses Sam's OTO (Odd
> Tiles Object) macro. Comments appreciated.
I like both helix and colors, but the word "(P)ersistence" is difficult
to read. Perhaps in another color wuold be better.
;-)
Paolo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 07/11/2011 05:13 AM, Paolo Gibellini wrote:
> >Jim Holsenback on date 10/07/2011 16:43 wrote:
>> How's this for a different approach ... I actually like this! It's just
>> an intersection slice of the distribution logo repeated using an
>> adaptation of the helix solution that Le_Forgeron posted a while ago.The
>> text and "helix-logo" object are textured together so the text gets it's
>> pigment from the depth position. The background uses Sam's OTO (Odd
>> Tiles Object) macro. Comments appreciated.
>
> I like both helix and colors, but the word "(P)ersistence" is difficult
> to read. Perhaps in another color wuold be better.
> ;-)
> Paolo
well how about that! in the non area light version those letters cast
a shadow on the object that helped with that ... i rendered the area
light version without the preview and didn't notice that it (the area
light) obliterated the shadow. guess my size parameters could use a
tweak or two
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Btw, maybe you could start a new thread for this new approach.
It's getting a bit inconvenient to navigate this one - at least
if, like me, you have set up the reader to display all messages
in a thread if it contains an unread post ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Christian Froeschlin <chr### [at] chrfr de> wrote:
> Btw, maybe you could start a new thread for this new approach.
>
> It's getting a bit inconvenient to navigate this one - at least
> if, like me, you have set up the reader to display all messages
> in a thread if it contains an unread post ;)
I've already changed my settings under Personalise->Message-Order to "Newest to
oldest"
No Navigation any more ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 13-7-2011 22:06, H. Karsten wrote:
> Christian Froeschlin<chr### [at] chrfrde> wrote:
>> Btw, maybe you could start a new thread for this new approach.
>>
>> It's getting a bit inconvenient to navigate this one - at least
>> if, like me, you have set up the reader to display all messages
>> in a thread if it contains an unread post ;)
>
> I've already changed my settings under Personalise->Message-Order to "Newest to
> oldest"
>
> No Navigation any more ;)
>
>
I wonder how to do this on Thunderbird...
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot wrote:
> On 13-7-2011 22:06, H. Karsten wrote:
>> Christian Froeschlin<chr### [at] chrfrde> wrote:
>>> Btw, maybe you could start a new thread for this new approach.
>>>
>>> It's getting a bit inconvenient to navigate this one - at least
>>> if, like me, you have set up the reader to display all messages
>>> in a thread if it contains an unread post ;)
>>
>> I've already changed my settings under Personalise->Message-Order to
>> "Newest to
>> oldest"
>>
>> No Navigation any more ;)
>>
>>
> I wonder how to do this on Thunderbird...
>
View -> Sort by -> Ascending / Descending...
Note that the “N” shortcut jumps to the next unread mess
age.
Jerome
--
mailto:jeb### [at] freefr
http://jeberger.free.fr
Jabber: jeb### [at] jabberfr
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'us-ascii' (1 KB)
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 14-7-2011 14:38, "Jérôme M. Berger" wrote:
> Thomas de Groot wrote:
>> On 13-7-2011 22:06, H. Karsten wrote:
>>> Christian Froeschlin<chr### [at] chrfrde> wrote:
>>>> Btw, maybe you could start a new thread for this new approach.
>>>>
>>>> It's getting a bit inconvenient to navigate this one - at least
>>>> if, like me, you have set up the reader to display all messages
>>>> in a thread if it contains an unread post ;)
>>>
>>> I've already changed my settings under Personalise->Message-Order to
>>> "Newest to
>>> oldest"
>>>
>>> No Navigation any more ;)
>>>
>>>
>> I wonder how to do this on Thunderbird...
>>
> View -> Sort by -> Ascending / Descending...
>
> Note that the “N” shortcut jumps to the next unread message.
>
> Jerome
Oops! Of course! Overlooked that... Thanks for showing me.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 7/14/2011 1:09, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> I wonder how to do this on Thunderbird...
Same as in virtually every Windows program. Click on the heading of the
column until the arrow points the way you want the sort to run. In later
versions of thunderbird, you have to turn off the threading, or it'll just
sort the entire thread.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
"Coding without comments is like
driving without turn signals."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The settings, I spoke of coming with the PovRay-Forum-Interface.
There appear in your browser, under your profile-settings ("Personalise" in the
yellow area above)
Best rgds,
Holger
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 14-7-2011 21:40, H. Karsten wrote:
> The settings, I spoke of coming with the PovRay-Forum-Interface.
>
> There appear in your browser, under your profile-settings ("Personalise" in the
> yellow area above)
>
> Best rgds,
> Holger
>
>
>
Thank you all guys (Holger, Daren, Jerôme). I sometimes have the
greatest difficulties to find the most obvious things...
Thomas
[Now, where are my spectacles again....?]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
