 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 06.03.2011 19:29, schrieb Jim Holsenback:
> This model was exported from ac3d trial version ... as per one of the
> sslt caveats, the portions that I used sslt on (plastic hoses) I changed
> those unions to merge to bundle all the smooth triangles together
Oooh - nice one!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 03/06/2011 02:29 PM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
> This model was exported from ac3d trial version ... as per one of the
> sslt caveats, the portions that I used sslt on (plastic hoses) I changed
> those unions to merge to bundle all the smooth triangles together
some improvements overs the first attempt ...
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'work.png' (827 KB)
Preview of image 'work.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 08/03/2011 10:32 AM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
>
> some improvements overs the first attempt ...
Better and better.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 03/08/2011 06:34 AM, Stephen wrote:
> On 08/03/2011 10:32 AM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
>>
>> some improvements overs the first attempt ...
>
> Better and better.
>
I think the challenge here is to come with a better viewing angle and/or
presentation ... I seem to be stuck on similar views with most of my
objects. I like the spot light presentation that I've seen in other
posts, but that kind of goes against the light dome with sunset motif
I'm currently using. Any ideas?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 08/03/2011 11:34 AM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
>
> I think the challenge here is to come with a better viewing angle and/or
> presentation ... I seem to be stuck on similar views with most of my
> objects. I like the spot light presentation that I've seen in other
> posts, but that kind of goes against the light dome with sunset motif
> I'm currently using. Any ideas?
spotlight with the sun in your lightdome for a start and maybe a hint of
What I might do is create an animation, moving the camera up and down
and side to side to see if I could get a better viewing angle. The
atomiser seems a bit foreshortened due to looking down on it.
I like the doily is it an image_map?
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 03/08/2011 08:20 AM, Stephen wrote:
> spotlight with the sun in your lightdome for a start and maybe a hint of
getting slightly better results using a different image in light dome,
(cityscape) ... I like the overhead spot look, so maybe the out in the
open sunset like I was using before was a poor choice.
> atomiser seems a bit foreshortened due to looking down on it.
yep that's exactly what was bugging me!
> I like the doily is it an image_map?
yes it is ... found a suitable image that had a black background. pulled
it into gimp and sampled the doily (real close up) in a couple of places
until I was able to get pretty much all of it ... then pasted it into an
image with transparent background
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 08/03/2011 12:45 PM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
> On 03/08/2011 08:20 AM, Stephen wrote:
>> spotlight with the sun in your lightdome for a start and maybe a hint of
>
> getting slightly better results using a different image in light dome,
> (cityscape) ... I like the overhead spot look, so maybe the out in the
> open sunset like I was using before was a poor choice.
>
More than likely. An indoor light probe would be better. Somewhere out
there, there is a bedroom probe but for the life of me I can't find it.
>> atomiser seems a bit foreshortened due to looking down on it.
>
> yep that's exactly what was bugging me!
>
If the scene does not take long to render then experiment.
>> I like the doily is it an image_map?
>
> yes it is ... found a suitable image that had a black background. pulled
> it into gimp and sampled the doily (real close up) in a couple of places
> until I was able to get pretty much all of it ... then pasted it into an
> image with transparent background
>
It looks as it has depth. :-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 08.03.2011 11:32, schrieb Jim Holsenback:
> some improvements overs the first attempt ...
To be honest I liked the first ground texture better; it had more
"style", somehow.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen <mcavoys_at@aoldotcom> wrote:
> > getting slightly better results using a different image in light dome,
> > (cityscape) ... I like the overhead spot look, so maybe the out in the
> > open sunset like I was using before was a poor choice.
>
> More than likely. An indoor light probe would be better. Somewhere out
> there, there is a bedroom probe but for the life of me I can't find it.
Here's another lightprobe I shot a while ago, this time inside the lobby of the
Auckland Business School. I've used it before in images I posted here.
http://s3.edouard.info/ak-business-school.hdr
Cheers,
Edouard.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Edouard" <pov### [at] edouard info> wrote:
> Here's another lightprobe I shot a while ago, this time inside the lobby of the
> Auckland Business School. I've used it before in images I posted here.
>
> http://s3.edouard.info/ak-business-school.hdr
>
> Cheers,
> Edouard.
Nice one, thanks :)
-------------------------------------------------
www.McGregorFineArt.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
