 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sorry, in my haste I attached the wrong vrsion of the image. My comments
should make more sense based on this version
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'Experiment.jpg' (114 KB)
Preview of image 'Experiment.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I'm happy with it.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 3 May 2007 00:32:31 +0200, "Gail Shaw" <initialsurname@sentech sa dot
com> wrote:
> just not ure anout the guy standing at the end.
>Without him, the scene seems to lack focus, but I'm not sure if he's the
>right thing.
>Sorry, in my haste I attached the wrong vrsion of the image. My comments
>should make more sense based on this version
>
True without the guy at the end, the focus changes but I like the empty scene.
His gun seems to be too heavy to be holding in one hand and I would beef him up
a bit, more muscular thighs. Also I don't think men look good in tights :-) At
least not action men.
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 03-05-2007 03:57:
> On Thu, 3 May 2007 00:32:31 +0200, "Gail Shaw" <initialsurname@sentech sa dot
> com> wrote:
>
>> just not ure anout the guy standing at the end.
>> Without him, the scene seems to lack focus, but I'm not sure if he's the
>> right thing.
>
>> Sorry, in my haste I attached the wrong vrsion of the image. My comments
>> should make more sense based on this version
>>
> True without the guy at the end, the focus changes but I like the empty scene.
> His gun seems to be too heavy to be holding in one hand and I would beef him up
> a bit, more muscular thighs. Also I don't think men look good in tights :-) At
> least not action men.
>
> Regards
> Stephen
This is a space station, gravity can be lower than usual.
--
Alain
-------------------------------------------------
A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their
own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth
of labor and bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government.
Thomas Jefferson
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 03 May 2007 06:01:01 -0400, Alain <ele### [at] netscape net> wrote:
>This is a space station, gravity can be lower than usual.
But can inertia?
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Gail Shaw" <initialsurname@sentech sa dot com> schreef in bericht
news:4639119d@news.povray.org...
> Sorry, in my haste I attached the wrong vrsion of the image. My comments
> should make more sense based on this version
>
>
I am not sure. What troubles me is the reason why he carries a gun at the
ready. There is nothing in the scene that suggests any threat to him. I
would be far more happy if he were a crew member just looking out of the
window. That would make the scene more... 'equilibrated'?
Otherwise, I think this is well-done really!
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Gail Shaw wrote:
> Sorry, in my haste I attached the wrong vrsion of the image. My comments
> should make more sense based on this version
Ah... I was thinking the "guy standing at the end" was invisible! :)
I'm with Tek about the colored lights, and with Thomas about the apparent
lack of a threat to the guy. And like Stephen, I think the image without the
armed guy had a nice composition.
Great work!
--
Jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] internlDOTnet> wrote
> I am not sure. What troubles me is the reason why he carries a gun at the
> ready. There is nothing in the scene that suggests any threat to him. I
> would be far more happy if he were a crew member just looking out of the
> window. That would make the scene more... 'equilibrated'?
> Otherwise, I think this is well-done really!
I agree about the firearm (which is not a good idea inside a space station
anyway). A patrolman, or better yet, a robot/probe, would make more sense,
I'd think. If those are windows, they are unnecessarily huge, and the stars
should not be visible with interior lighting. So, getting rid of the windows
and adding a dozen or more units down a deep corridor may be an idea.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Gail Shaw wrote:
> Sorry, in my haste I attached the wrong vrsion of the image. My comments
> should make more sense based on this version
>
I think I'd like this animated. First the empty scene, then the guy with
the gun comes sneaking in, searching for something...
Ever seen Alien(s)? :)
--
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
http://www.zbxt.net
aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 03-05-2007 06:27:
> On Thu, 03 May 2007 06:01:01 -0400, Alain <ele### [at] netscapenet> wrote:
>
>> This is a space station, gravity can be lower than usual.
>
> But can inertia?
>
> Regards
> Stephen
No. Put more mass to help absorb the recoil. Beter yet: use particles beam
weapons or some sort of energy projectors.
--
Alain
-------------------------------------------------
Congregationalist: Shit that happens to one person is just as good as shit that
happens to another.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
