Gail Shaw wrote:
> Sorry, in my haste I attached the wrong vrsion of the image. My comments
> should make more sense based on this version

   Ah... I was thinking the "guy standing at the end" was invisible! :)

   I'm with Tek about the colored lights, and with Thomas about the apparent 
lack of a threat to the guy. And like Stephen, I think the image without the 
armed guy had a nice composition.

   Great work!

--
Jaime

Post a reply to this message