I meant it shows it's a cut in pov: You can see a light edge on the bottom part
of the cut, which suggests it's actually a 3D cut (the light bit being the
surface of the cut catching the light).

Though I realise now my first point was kind of dumb, 'cause like you say you
would also have a gap if you used photoshop! doh! :)

--
Tek
http://www.evilsuperbrain.com


Stefan Persson <azy### [at] teliacom> wrote in message
news:3e183596@news.povray.org...
> Of course I was referring to how the "cut" was made. Not the whole image..
> ;)
> Personally I have nothing against post-processing..
> It's just that I find the image a bit blurred in that region. That's why I
> was
> curious if the image is a result of two other images and PS:d together.
>
> /Stefan
> --

Post a reply to this message

No post job.

Here the sources.
Is it enough ?

Greetings.

KT



> I think the anti-aliasing around the "cut" looks a bit wierd. Photoshopped?
> Im just curious.
>
> /Stefan

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'Bizarre.pov.txt' (4 KB) Download 'Bizarre.INI.txt' (2 KB) Download 'bizarre.inc.txt' (8 KB)

Hehe.. Of course it's enough.
If you really wanted to impress me you should have done it in Paint.. ;)

My point again was not to accuse you of cheating. I just wanted to know
where the artifacts came from.. that's all..

Cheers
/Stefan

--
__________________________________________________________

"People demand freedom of speech to make up for the
freedom of thought which they avoid."
- Soren Aabye Kierkegaard (1813-1855)

"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human
stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
- Albert Einstein (1879-1955)

No animals were harmed during the production of this mail.


__________________________________________________________

"Kzerphii Toomk" <nospam@nospam> skrev i meddelandet
news:3e18422a@news.povray.org...
> No post job.
>
> Here the sources.
> Is it enough ?
>
> Greetings.
>
> KT
>

>
> > I think the anti-aliasing around the "cut" looks a bit wierd.
Photoshopped?
> > Im just curious.
> >
> > /Stefan
>
>
>

Post a reply to this message

I've understand... ;-)

KT



> Hehe.. Of course it's enough.
> If you really wanted to impress me you should have done it in Paint.. ;)
>
> My point again was not to accuse you of cheating. I just wanted to know
> where the artifacts came from.. that's all..
>
> Cheers
> /Stefan
>
> --
> __________________________________________________________
>
> "People demand freedom of speech to make up for the
> freedom of thought which they avoid."
> - Soren Aabye Kierkegaard (1813-1855)
>
> "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human
> stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
> - Albert Einstein (1879-1955)
>
> No animals were harmed during the production of this mail.
>

> __________________________________________________________
>
> "Kzerphii Toomk" <nospam@nospam> skrev i meddelandet
> news:3e18422a@news.povray.org...
> > No post job.
> >
> > Here the sources.
> > Is it enough ?
> >
> > Greetings.
> >
> > KT
> >

> >
> > > I think the anti-aliasing around the "cut" looks a bit wierd.
> Photoshopped?
> > > Im just curious.
> > >
> > > /Stefan
> >
> >
> >
>
>

Post a reply to this message

Ah, a wise guy, like me!
--
-David

"Ib Rasmussen" <ib### [at] ibrasdk> wrote in message
news:3E1### [at] ibrasdk...
> That is easy enough - or did you want it modelled? ;)
>
> /Ib

Post a reply to this message

Wow, that's really neat!
--
-David

"Tek" <tek### [at] evilsuperbraincom> wrote in message
news:3e183769@news.povray.org...
> This is just a quick attempt at that illusion. It only works for an
orthographic
> camera. I've included another view so you can see how it's done :)

Post a reply to this message