I meant it shows it's a cut in pov: You can see a light edge on the bottom part
of the cut, which suggests it's actually a 3D cut (the light bit being the
surface of the cut catching the light).
Though I realise now my first point was kind of dumb, 'cause like you say you
would also have a gap if you used photoshop! doh! :)
--
Tek
http://www.evilsuperbrain.com
Stefan Persson <azy### [at] telia com> wrote in message
news:3e183596@news.povray.org...
> Of course I was referring to how the "cut" was made. Not the whole image..
> ;)
> Personally I have nothing against post-processing..
> It's just that I find the image a bit blurred in that region. That's why I
> was
> curious if the image is a result of two other images and PS:d together.
>
> /Stefan
> --
Post a reply to this message
|
