 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Christoph Gerber" <ni.### [at] bluewin ch> wrote in message
news:3dcc2f19$1@news.povray.org...
: You are right, I'm not happy with the sky. After fiddling for 3 days with
: different media settings I gave up. It's much easier (at least for me) to
: achieve good results if the light is coming from the side. With a sunset
: type of light I was not able to obtain better results so far. Using a
: Terragen sky as background would be an easy way to overcome the problem ...
: Christoph
What are your media settings?
=Bob=
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Wooooowwwww.
- Slime
[ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Love the trees, sun is good too, but the water is somewhat fake - it
just doesn't seem like the right type of waves (ripples) to me. The
clouds are a bit off, too, I think.
It's just that the trees put everything else to shame :)
Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
Personal e-mail : pet### [at] vipbg
TAG e-mail : pet### [at] tagpovrayorg
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Christoph Gerber" <ni.### [at] bluewinch> wrote in message
news:3dcc2f19$1@news.povray.org...
> You are right, I'm not happy with the sky.
In my most humble opinion, the problem with the sky is the dull reddish
color in the clouds. When there's red in a sunset, it's a brighter color
red, especially when the sun is still so high above the horizon.
Also, the water seems awfully choppy for such a wide, meandering river, with
no other hint of wind. (Actually, the presence of the haze would indicate
little or no wind at all...)
With that said, I would like to mention that this is a stunning work! This
must be a magical forest...
Regards,
Dave Blandston
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
3dcc2787@news.povray.org...
> This scene is derived form my Elevado scene posted a few days ago. It
> contains more than 15'000 mesh trees. The river terrain is a one of the
> samples coming with World Machine. Except the number of trees this is a
> quite simple scene. Nevertheless it took almost 30 hours to render on a
1.7
> GHz PC with 500 MB of RAM.
Once again, great work Christoph!
A very beautiful and relaxing image.
To give some constructive criticsm, I must agree with
other comments about the clouds and horizon colours.
If it's evening time there must be more red
(I think golden fits better for the clouds).
That will make these colors reflect in the water, what
will be more realistic.
Also the water should be more quiet I think.
Anyway, a beautiful image.
P.S.: You didn't send Elevado to the IRTC... bad boy... ;-)
Bye
Txemi Jendrix
http://www.txemijendrix.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
How lovely... Hardly looks like it came out of a computer! (Although it
perhaps looks more like a painting than a photograph - can't ask me why!)
Keep it up!
Andrew.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Here is just a quick try to implement some of the comments (trees disabled).
Bumpiness of the watersurface is much lower and a tint of red is added to
the horizon. Much better in my opinion, especially the water. Thanks for the
hints!
Christoph
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'River2.JPG' (53 KB)
Preview of image 'River2.JPG'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I liked it much better with those trees. The water could use variation over
the surface area, smoother places and rougher places, from wind differences.
The sky is great.
--
Farewell,
Bob
"Christoph Gerber" <ni.### [at] bluewinch> wrote in message
news:3dccf24b@news.povray.org...
> Here is just a quick try to implement some of the comments (trees
disabled).
> Bumpiness of the watersurface is much lower and a tint of red is added to
> the horizon. Much better in my opinion, especially the water. Thanks for
the
> hints!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The trees will be back in the final render, they were just disabled to speed
up testing of water and sky.
Christoph
"hughes, b." <omn### [at] charternet> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:3dcd0f9d@news.povray.org...
> I liked it much better with those trees. The water could use variation
over
> the surface area, smoother places and rougher places, from wind
differences.
> The sky is great.
> --
> Farewell,
> Bob
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 9 Nov 2002 12:32:03 +0100, "Christoph Gerber"
<ni.### [at] bluewinch> wrote:
>Here is just a quick try to implement some of the comments (trees disabled).
>Bumpiness of the watersurface is much lower and a tint of red is added to
>the horizon. Much better in my opinion, especially the water. Thanks for the
>hints!
Much better now (and yes, I know you'll put the trees back in :) ).
The water still looks a little CG. Are you using fresnel reflection?
Attenuation?
Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
Personal e-mail : pet### [at] vipbg
TAG e-mail : pet### [at] tagpovrayorg
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
