![](/i/fill.gif) |
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
> That's usually how it works anyway. When a person spends as much time with
> PoV as you obdviously have, a fast PC moves up close to the top of the
Huh, I wish this would be the case. In fact I have only few hours a week
time for PoV. More than the half of this time the PC is busy with rendering
*g* (although you are right: I was already a user of the very first DOS
versions, running on a 486Dx2/66Mhz).
Luckily most of the things I had in my mind worked fine on the first attempt
(or almost) and I got some extra, unforseen spare time last week. I used it
to enjoy PoV.
> priority list. If a person can find $35 a week for cigarettes, another can
> find $35 a week for a computer.
No doubt. (I don't smoke BTW). It is not a matter of money. I could efford a
new PC easily but I don't think that it makes sense. 99% of the time this
new computer would stand around turned off. Additionally I would consume
most of the time I have to set it up properly, get all the stuff running I'd
like to have (since I am used to it in the current environment) and I would
have even less time for PoV.
> Also, I would consider you very talented already.
Thanks. So you buy me a new PC, right? *gg*
regards
SY
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
>
> [...]
>
> No doubt. (I don't smoke BTW). It is not a matter of money. I could efford a
> new PC easily but I don't think that it makes sense. 99% of the time this
> new computer would stand around turned off.
Unbelievable, a Pover who fears his Computer won't get enough work...
Really, none of the scenes i saw from you seems to be really slow although
it might render quite long on your machine.
I think the average render time of scenes has probably not decreased since
the beginning of POV.
'Der Appetit kommt beim Essen'. ;-)
Christoph
--
POV-Ray tutorials, IsoWood include,
TransSkin and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/
Last updated 06 Feb. 2002 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
> Unbelievable, a Pover who fears his Computer won't get enough work...
Indeed!
If I had a scene which takes ages to render but looks great when finished,
I'd let the PC run for days and enjoy the result. Unfortunately I
concentrate more on programming and modelling so it has only something to
work on if >I< do something.....
> Really, none of the scenes i saw from you seems to be really slow although
> it might render quite long on your machine.
How do you *see* the render time?
Just kidding. You mean because I don't use halo, media, refraction or
complex interiors? Just wait... this will come some day.... when the fern
and all it's "collegues" are finished. At this point they all come together
and I hope the scene will look realistic and bloody complex in detail.
Approx. in 5 years. *g*
> I think the average render time of scenes has probably not decreased since
> the beginning of POV.
No. IMO it is quite constant... the faster the CPU gets the more complex
primitives are available in POV :-)
> 'Der Appetit kommt beim Essen'. ;-)
zu werden.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
an excellent beginning. very well done.
-peter
--
Current obsession: "Ballet pour ma fille."
http://www.applesnake.net
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |