 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Peter Hertel" wrote:
> Well.. here it comes, after 1.5 years without updates, my new web page.
This
> time dedicated to POV-Ray.
>
> http://hertel.no/peter
Very nice design and easy to navigate! :)
> I'm not sure if the top frame is too large, and if I should
> make three links/labels/wood sticks pr. row instead of only two.
> What do you think?
I think three would be better.
Rune
--
3D images and anims, include files, tutorials and more:
Rune's World: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated June 26)
POV-Ray Users: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk/povrayusers/
POV-Ray Webring: http://webring.povray.co.uk
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
copy.html and povray.html have weird text. The text is black on white
background, but only where characters are, instead of a white box with
black text like on your index page. So I get white bars with black text
and the background image between and around the bars. Maybe it's just
my browser (Netscape 4.75).
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricy net> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Yaayy! Opera!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
That's because I've been a bit lazy :)
Instead of making a <table> around the text, like on the index page, I made
a CSS-class which makes the background of the paragraph white. .pwhite{
background-color : #FFFFFF; }
Because of that, there will not be any white space / padding around the
text.
It doesn't look too good, so I think I'll make some tables instead.
Peter
> copy.html and povray.html have weird text. The text is black on white
> background, but only where characters are, instead of a white box with
> black text like on your index page. So I get white bars with black text
> and the background image between and around the bars. Maybe it's just
> my browser (Netscape 4.75).
>
> --
> David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
> My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Very nice design and easy to navigate! :)
Thanks :)
> > I'm not sure if the top frame is too large, and if I should
> > make three links/labels/wood sticks pr. row instead of only two.
> > What do you think?
>
> I think three would be better.
Check it out now..
I think it depends a lot on which resolution you use.. this version might be
a bit too small for 1280x1024, while the other one is a bit too big on
800x600.. the everlasting problem :)
Peter
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Yaayy! Opera!
>
In my opinion, the only useful thing :)
The "mouse-navigation system" rocks!
Peter
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Peter Hertel" wrote:
> Check it out now..
I think it wouldn't hurt to make the navigation buttons at the top a bit
larger. They should still fit in even with 640x480.
But more importantly: remove the borders around them! (I believe it's an
error? I don't remember them being there before...)
Rune
--
3D images and anims, include files, tutorials and more:
Rune's World: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated June 26)
POV-Ray Users: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk/povrayusers/
POV-Ray Webring: http://webring.povray.co.uk
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> I think it wouldn't hurt to make the navigation buttons at the top a bit
> larger. They should still fit in even with 640x480.
A few pixels maybe.. I belive the Copyright text was a bit dark too, so I've
done a rerender and made it a bit brighter, and bigger.
> But more importantly: remove the borders around them! (I believe it's an
> error? I don't remember them being there before...)
Oh, well.. I forgot to test it in IE..
Opera uses border=0 as default, even if the image is inside an <a></a>
It's fixed now, thanks for mentioning :)
Btw, what do you think about downloading time? I use PNG instead of JPG,
because it's much prettier, is it worth the wait?
Peter
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
It looks much ebtter now.
> Btw, what do you think about downloading time?
> I use PNG instead of JPG, because it's much prettier,
> is it worth the wait?
Well, it actually doesn't take very long even on my slow 56K connection, so
I guess it's OK. However, I'm nor sure all browsers support png.
Rune
--
3D images and anims, include files, tutorials and more:
Rune's World: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated June 26)
POV-Ray Users: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk/povrayusers/
POV-Ray Webring: http://webring.povray.co.uk
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> > Btw, what do you think about downloading time?
> > I use PNG instead of JPG, because it's much prettier,
> > is it worth the wait?
>
> Well, it actually doesn't take very long even on my slow 56K connection,
so
> I guess it's OK. However, I'm nor sure all browsers support png.
Yes.. that's true, but it's only older browsers that don't.
If I'm not mistaken, Netsacpe was the first one to include it in version 4.x
something, I'm not sure if IE4 supports it, but IE5 does. And Opera does
too, of course :)
If someone run with IE3 or something, I think it would be smart to download
a new broswer anyway! (Opera is only a ~5mb download!)
Peter
http://hertel.no/peter
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
