 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thanks for the kind comments
I agree with comments about lighting, the fog seems to kill it. The
mountains are in sunlight the ground slightly blurred by a low mist - a
common sight in British mountains, from which I draw much of my inspiration.
I will have to play some more. All the objects are placed randomly, more or
less, some are placed according to height, some according to a pigment
pattern and some according to an image map.
I will place some objects strategically by hand but only at the last.
The water has given me nothing but problems - radiosity seems to make
colours very unpredictable, which can be very exciting when something
unexpected happens but irritating when you can control it.
The image has a Tolkeinish air but I don't really want to go down that road,
I'll keep thinking.
Thanks all
Mick
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mick Hazelgrove wrote:
>
> Hi All
>
> A work in progress - it started as a half formed response to the current
> IRTC theme but I doubt I'll have time to finish it, not to mention the fact
> that the other half of the idea hasn't formed at all. There are lots of
> details still to be sorted but I thought I'd get your opinions before I
> finished it.
>
Very nice,
the water seems to lack reflection and the mountains need some more work
IMO, but the foreground, esp. grass and stones look great.
I have something in work for the next IRTC as well, but it somehow still
lacks being on-topic. You seem to have the same problem to some extent,
but it already looks quite 'mystic'.
Christoph
--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmx de>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Mick Hazelgrove" <mic### [at] mhazelgrovefsnetcouk> wrote in message
news:3b6a8d5f@news.povray.org...
> The image has a Tolkeinish air but I don't really want to go down that road,
Well, it does tend to go ever, ever on....
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> The image has a Tolkeinish air but I don't really want to go down that road,
> I'll keep thinking.
If you want you can use this world I describe here.
http://www.angelfire.com/art/catokhan/buehara.html
If it inspires you, feel free to use it. (No models, just a description of a
fantasy world)
- Nekar
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Sander" <san### [at] stolscom> wrote in message
news:MPG### [at] NEWSPOVRAYORG...
> I agree with Jaime: some of the scenery strikes me as unreal (intended
> that way?) but it is difficult to pinpoint the cause. The leftmost
> menhir seems too much tilted, perhaps.
Personally, I think it's from the "painted" look - it looks so much
like a painting, its hard to tell its raytraced (that could be a
good or a bad thing :) As someone pointed out, some shadows could
help, but overall its an excellent image :)
...Chambers
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 3 Aug 2001 09:22:10 +0100, Mick Hazelgrove wrote:
>Hi All
>
>A work in progress - it started as a half formed response to the current
>IRTC theme but I doubt I'll have time to finish it, not to mention the fact
>that the other half of the idea hasn't formed at all. There are lots of
>details still to be sorted but I thought I'd get your opinions before I
>finished it.
I love the shapes of the rocks, and the only bad thing I could say about it is
it looks very dry and dusty for a place with so much snow and vegetation around.
--
Cheers
Steve email mailto:ste### [at] zeroppsuklinuxnet
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
7:16pm up 20 days, 21:19, 2 users, load average: 1.03, 1.01, 1.00
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <3b6ac738@news.povray.org>, Ben Chambers says...
>
> Personally, I think it's from the "painted" look - it looks so much
> like a painting, its hard to tell its raytraced (that could be a
> good or a bad thing :) As someone pointed out, some shadows could
> help, but overall its an excellent image :)
>
> ...Chambers
>
That it looks like a painting is quite an achievement, IMO!
--
Regards, Sander
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Looks nice. It looks very much like a painting, especially the
background elements. The mountains are not particularly "realistic",
but they have that traditional Japanese art look and it blends very well
into your scene IMO.
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
This reminds me of some Turner's paintings...looks great!
JRG.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Sander" <san### [at] stolscom> wrote in message
news:MPG### [at] NEWSPOVRAYORG...
> In article <3b6ac738@news.povray.org>, Ben Chambers says...
> >
> > Personally, I think it's from the "painted" look - it looks so much
> > like a painting, its hard to tell its raytraced (that could be a
> > good or a bad thing :) As someone pointed out, some shadows could
> > help, but overall its an excellent image :)
> >
> > ...Chambers
> >
> That it looks like a painting is quite an achievement, IMO!
>
> --
> Regards, Sander
I agree, it is quite an accomplishment. Whether its good or bad
depends on what the author was trying to achieve, though :) What
would happen if he were trying to make it photorealistic, and I
told him he had made an excellent representation of a painting? :)
...Chambers
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
