 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
PLEASE! POST THE CODE!!!! Love teh glass and the caustics
Dennis McDaniel wrote:
> This is a model of a candelabra that my uncle made for my wife and me
> as a wedding gift. Modeled in Moray, rendered in POV-Ray 3.1g.
> Original render was @ 1280x1024 and took just over 7 hours on my C500.
>
> I'm very anxious about the pending (?) release of the next official
> version of POV-Ray and the subsequent release of Moray which will
> incorporate new features such as photons. I really like the new
> effects, but I've become very dependant on Moray and haven't had the
> wherewithall to try to use Mega'. I know the flames need some work,
> but I was having problems with media.
>
> Opinions?
>
> Dennis
>
> [Image]
>
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'us-ascii' (1 KB)
Download 'c:\docume~1\dwm\locals~1\temp\nsmailq4.jpeg.jpg' (68 KB)
Preview of image 'c:\docume~1\dwm\locals~1\temp\nsmailq4.jpeg.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Glad you like it. I'm playing with the flame texture. Let me get it
closer and then I'll post it. I finally figured out my media
problem--forgot to make my sky sphere hollow--Doh! The only problem I'm
having now it getting the flame bright enough. Anybody have any
suggestions? I'm pretty new to media. I'm playing with David's
suggestion too (thanks).
Dennis
"Psychomek" <psy### [at] home com> wrote in message
news:39642671.4E449653@home.com...
PLEASE! POST THE CODE!!!! Love teh glass and the caustics
Dennis McDaniel wrote:
This is a model of a candelabra that my uncle made for my wife and
me as a wedding gift. Modeled in Moray, rendered in POV-Ray 3.1g.
Original render was @ 1280x1024 and took just over 7 hours on my C500.
I'm very anxious about the pending (?) release of the next official
version of POV-Ray and the subsequent release of Moray which will
incorporate new features such as photons. I really like the new
effects, but I've become very dependant on Moray and haven't had the
wherewithall to try to use Mega'. I know the flames need some work, but
I was having problems with media.
Opinions?
Dennis
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'iso-8859-1' (3 KB)
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Use 'emission rgb 2' or something like that and in addition to that an
absorbing media with the same absorbtion-color, but use colors witch absorb
all light but the color of your emitting media (something like rgb
1-emicol). That gives you bright media, witch can also be seen on bright
backgrounds.
Just something I learned here recently, hope it helps.
Marc-Hendrik
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Great! but please no more posting in HTML
Dennis McDaniel wrote:
> Glad you like it. I'm playing with the flame texture. Let me get it
> closer and then I'll post it. I finally figured out my media
> problem--forgot to make my sky sphere hollow--Doh! The only problem
> I'm having now it getting the flame bright enough. Anybody have any
> suggestions? I'm pretty new to media. I'm playing with David's
> suggestion too (thanks). Dennis
>
>
> "Psychomek" <psy### [at] homecom> wrote in message
> news:39642671.4E449653@home.com...PLEASE! POST THE CODE!!!!
> Love teh glass and the caustics
>
> Dennis McDaniel wrote:
>
> > This is a model of a candelabra that my uncle made for my
> > wife and me as a wedding gift. Modeled in Moray, rendered
> > in POV-Ray 3.1g. Original render was @ 1280x1024 and took
> > just over 7 hours on my C500.
> >
> > I'm very anxious about the pending (?) release of the next
> > official version of POV-Ray and the subsequent release of
> > Moray which will incorporate new features such as
> > photons. I really like the new effects, but I've become
> > very dependant on Moray and haven't had the wherewithall
> > to try to use Mega'. I know the flames need some work,
> > but I was having problems with media.
> >
> > Opinions?
> >
> > Dennis
> >
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thanks for the advice. I don't know if I'm in love with the flames, but
they definitely look a lot less like Christmas lights. I think I'm going to
call this one complete.
Dennis
"Marc-Hendrik Bremer" <Mar### [at] t-onlinede> wrote in message
news:3964b716@news.povray.org...
Use 'emission rgb 2' or something like that and in addition to that an
absorbing media with the same absorbtion-color, but use colors witch absorb
all light but the color of your emitting media (something like rgb
1-emicol). That gives you bright media, witch can also be seen on bright
backgrounds.
Just something I learned here recently, hope it helps.
Marc-Hendrik
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'candelabra.jpg' (68 KB)
Preview of image 'candelabra.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Here is a .zip file with all of the files created by Moray, as well as the
.mdl file.
Dennis
"Psychomek" <psy### [at] homecom> wrote in message
news:39642671.4E449653@home.com...
PLEASE! POST THE CODE!!!! Love teh glass and the caustics
Dennis McDaniel wrote:
This is a model of a candelabra that my uncle made for my wife and me as a
wedding gift. Modeled in Moray, rendered in POV-Ray 3.1g. Original render
was @ 1280x1024 and took just over 7 hours on my C500.
I'm very anxious about the pending (?) release of the next official version
of POV-Ray and the subsequent release of Moray which will incorporate new
features such as photons. I really like the new effects, but I've become
very dependant on Moray and haven't had the wherewithall to try to use
Mega'. I know the flames need some work, but I was having problems with
media.
Opinions?
Dennis
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'candelabra.zip' (54 KB)
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Posting source is fine, but binaries.scene-files is definitely the
right place to do it. Better archiving helps people find back
what they want. Thanks.
Fabien.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Well, I think, the flames still aren't opaque enough, but this one is really
very nice!
Marc-Hendrik
Dennis McDaniel schrieb in Nachricht <3965f209@news.povray.org>...
>Thanks for the advice. I don't know if I'm in love with the flames, but
>they definitely look a lot less like Christmas lights. I think I'm going
to
>call this one complete.
>
>Dennis
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Point taken. I'll stick it over there. Thanks.
"Fabien Mosen" <fab### [at] skynetbe> wrote in message
news:3965FF4A.5E27F26B@skynet.be...
Posting source is fine, but binaries.scene-files is definitely the
right place to do it. Better archiving helps people find back
what they want. Thanks.
Fabien.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hello there,
Looks really very good!! Very realistic and ... both praise to you and
your uncle.. And your wife, of course not to forget.. ;o)
I wonder why no one has commented on this image yet, or is it just my
browser that doesn't display any responses. Anyway, it's fine work! And
took a whole lot of rendertime - gosh. And you didn't even use soft
shadows, it seems.
You also ask for critics, ok.. The flames could be improved a little
(but not by me) and the sterin is too white in my opinion.
Hugo
Dennis McDaniel wrote:
>
> This is a model of a candelabra that my uncle made for my wife and me
> as a wedding gift. Modeled in Moray, rendered in POV-Ray 3.1g.
> Original render was @ 1280x1024 and took just over 7 hours on my C500.
-- snip
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
