 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
While playing around with find_edges I ended up with this... almost
qualifies as black and white, don't you think?
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'ClearLogo 003.jpg' (9 KB)
Preview of image 'ClearLogo 003.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nice. How did you get that blue splotch?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Tony[B]" <ben### [at] panama c-comnet> wrote :
>
> Nice. How did you get that blue splotch?
That's the sky. It's a clear object with lines traced around it's edges.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
This is a nice image. It is just screaming to be animated by spinning
and moving the outside objects closer and further to the central
square... This does qualify for black and white on it's own. I'm not
sure how you would color it, tho.
Josh
Bill DeWitt wrote:
> While playing around with find_edges I ended up with this... almost
> qualifies as black and white, don't you think?
>
> [Image]
--
Josh English
eng### [at] spiritonecom
"May your hopes, dreams, and plans not be destroyed by a few zeros."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I just happen to have an .avi ready... I'll put it in p.b.a
--
I get paid to do -anything- while connected to the internet.
Please use my referral id to find out more
http://www.getpaid4.com/?billdewitt
"Josh English" <eng### [at] spiritonecom> wrote in message
news:3933D530.E58E43A7@spiritone.com...
> This is a nice image. It is just screaming to be animated by spinning
> and moving the outside objects closer and further to the central
> square... This does qualify for black and white on it's own. I'm not
> sure how you would color it, tho.
>
> Josh
>
> Bill DeWitt wrote:
>
> > While playing around with find_edges I ended up with this... almost
> > qualifies as black and white, don't you think?
> >
> > [Image]
>
> --
> Josh English
> eng### [at] spiritonecom
> "May your hopes, dreams, and plans not be destroyed by a few zeros."
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Bill DeWitt" wrote:
> While playing around with find_edges I
> ended up with this... almost qualifies as
> black and white, don't you think?
Black lines on white background qualifies as black and white. However, I
think the lines ought to be much thicker. I also think it would be best if
the lines were resolution independent. That is, higher resolution means
thicker lines and smaller resolution means thinner lines.
Greetings,
Rune
---
Updated April 25: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk
Containing 3D images, stereograms, tutorials,
The POV Desktop Theme, 350+ raytracing jokes,
miscellaneous other things, and a lot of fun!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Rune" <run### [at] inamecom> wrote :
>
> Black lines on white background qualifies as black and white. However, I
> think the lines ought to be much thicker. I also think it would be best if
> the lines were resolution independent. That is, higher resolution means
> thicker lines and smaller resolution means thinner lines.
Well, it was obviously not a submission, but putting in a white
background would fix that. As for resolution, if you render it bigger, the
lines are bigger... what else do you mean?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Bill DeWitt" wrote:
> "Rune" wrote :
> > Black lines on white background qualifies as
> > black and white. However, I think the lines ought
> > to be much thicker.
> Well, it was obviously not a submission, but
> putting in a white background would fix that.
The submission rules have not been made yet, so we can't tell.
No logos can be officially submitted before all rules have been made.
No logos are officially submitted to the contest yet.
> > I also think it would be best if the lines were
> > resolution independent. That is, higher resolution
> > means thicker lines and smaller resolution means
> > thinner lines.
> As for resolution, if you render it bigger, the
> lines are bigger... what else do you mean?
Just that. Try to post the image in two different resolutions so we can see
if we understand each other right.
Greetings,
Rune
---
Updated April 25: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk
Containing 3D images, stereograms, tutorials,
The POV Desktop Theme, 350+ raytracing jokes,
miscellaneous other things, and a lot of fun!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Rune" <run### [at] inamecom> wrote :
>
> Just that. Try to post the image in two different resolutions so we can
see
> if we understand each other right.
Well, for the Black and White required image, I would probably do it in
one size that has a particular line width. Since the BW is an arbitrary
criteria and every image will be of only a certain information depth, there
is no reason to make this particular image conform to standards that other,
non-rendered images would not have to follow.
IOW, when I submit it for the competition, it will be a flat image like
all the rest, what would line size adaptability have to do with anything?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Bill DeWitt" wrote:
> "Rune" wrote :
> > Just that. Try to post the image in two different
> > resolutions so we can see if we understand each
> > other right.
>
> Well, for the Black and White required image, I
> would probably do it in one size that has a particular
> line width.
The submission formats have not yet been decided.
More than one black and white version may be required,
such as one large and one icon-size version.
> Since the BW is an arbitrary criteria and every image
> will be of only a certain information depth, there
> is no reason to make this particular image conform to
> standards that other, non-rendered images would not
> have to follow.
>
> IOW, when I submit it for the competition, it will be
> a flat image like all the rest, what would line size
> adaptability have to do with anything?
I'm not sure exactly what you mean, and we may just be misunderstanding each
other, so I'll try to explain my own point a little better:
Say you have a logo that consists of some black lines on a white background.
If you draw/render the logo in 32x32 pixels and all the lines are 3 pixels
wide, then the lines seem to be rather thick. If you draw/render the same
logo in 320x320 pixels and the lines are *still* 3 pixels wide, then the
lines seems very *thin*, and it gives the logo a completely other "feel". I
don't think that is good. The logo should look the same way no matter what
resolution it is viewed in.
What I think is, that the size (thickness) of the lines should follow the
size of the rest of the image. You could say that the thickness of the lines
are a part of the logo, and should thus always be the same relative to the
size of the logo. So if you make the image 10 times bigger, then the lines
should be 10 times thicker too. I think it should be that way no matter if
the logo is made in POV-Ray or not.
Greetings,
Rune
---
Updated April 25: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk
Containing 3D images, stereograms, tutorials,
The POV Desktop Theme, 350+ raytracing jokes,
miscellaneous other things, and a lot of fun!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
