POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Re: Winamp skin, TubeAmp (80k) Server Time
3 Oct 2024 04:56:41 EDT (-0400)
  Re: Winamp skin, TubeAmp (80k) (Message 5 to 14 of 14)  
<<< Previous 4 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages
From: Mario Splivalo
Subject: Re: Winamp skin, TubeAmp (80k)
Date: 10 Mar 2000 03:13:12
Message: <MPG.13326a90e124ed1798968a@news.povray.org>
In article <38c6df91@news.povray.org>, jht### [at] mailacom says...
> If WinAmp didn't give my WinNT BSODs, I would certainly use your skin
> with it! Much nicer than the original...

What is BSOD?

	Mike


Post a reply to this message

From: Jon A  Cruz
Subject: Re: Winamp skin, TubeAmp (80k)
Date: 10 Mar 2000 03:24:51
Message: <38C8B2AF.72FF4251@geocities.com>
Mario Splivalo wrote:

> In article <38c6df91@news.povray.org>, jht### [at] mailacom says...
> > If WinAmp didn't give my WinNT BSODs, I would certainly use your skin
> > with it! Much nicer than the original...
>
> What is BSOD?

http://foldoc.doc.ic.ac.uk/foldoc/foldoc.cgi?query=BSOD

--
"My new computer's got the clocks, it rocks
But it was obsolete before I opened the box" - W.A.Y.


Post a reply to this message

From: Bill DeWitt
Subject: Re: Winamp skin, TubeAmp (80k)
Date: 10 Mar 2000 07:04:57
Message: <38c8e4e9@news.povray.org>
"Johannes Hubert" <jht### [at] mailacom> wrote :
>
> If WinAmp didn't give my WinNT BSODs
>

    Hmm, if WinAmp, perhaps the most widely used app for Windows in the last
few years, gives you BSODs, you have failed to install Windows properly.


Post a reply to this message

From: David Fontaine
Subject: Re: Winamp skin, TubeAmp (80k)
Date: 10 Mar 2000 17:24:39
Message: <38C97563.7927800D@faricy.net>
Johannes Hubert wrote:

> If WinAmp didn't give my WinNT BSODs, I would certainly use your skin
> with it! Much nicer than the original...

You mean if WinNT didn't give your WinNT BSODs... <duck>

--
___     _______________________________________________
 | \     |_          <dav### [at] faricynet> <ICQ 55354965>
 |_/avid |ontaine        http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/

"The only difference between me and a madman is that I'm not mad." -Dali


Post a reply to this message

From: Jon A  Cruz
Subject: Re: Winamp skin, TubeAmp (80k)
Date: 10 Mar 2000 23:57:24
Message: <38C9D38A.65366D85@geocities.com>
Bill DeWitt wrote:

> "Johannes Hubert" <jht### [at] mailacom> wrote :
> >
> > If WinAmp didn't give my WinNT BSODs
> >
>
>     Hmm, if WinAmp, perhaps the most widely used app for Windows in the last
> few years, gives you BSODs, you have failed to install Windows properly.

No.

Might be that he has just the wrong version of of something for the wrong
ServicePack. Or a different motherboard. Or a different video card. Or an SMP
machine. Or a different audio card. Or different built-in hardware. Or a
different version of DirectX. Or some unexpected stuff in his TEMP directory.
Or some unexpected stuff in his registry...

Just look at the problems Chris Cason had with Creative Labs. If The largest
sound-card manufacturer (who even gets to tell MS how to do some things) can't
even get their drivers right, why do you assume any problems can't be due to
something other than user error?


I myself had a system that would choke on hard video output. MPEG playing, for
example. Immediate death, with not even a BSOD. Just insta-freeze.

Oh, plus MS VJ++ 1.1 had horrible problems with SMP machines. Among other
things, as soon as you'd save some file that was over a certain size....
BOOM!!!
Hmmm. MS's KB search is so bad, I can't find that one off hand. But I did find
Article ID: Q194901 "BUG: Visual J++ 6.0 May Crash When Opening a Large Java
File". Their answer? "It's a bug. Don't make large files".

--
"My new computer's got the clocks, it rocks
But it was obsolete before I opened the box" - W.A.Y.


Post a reply to this message

From: Bob Hughes
Subject: Re: Winamp skin, TubeAmp (80k)
Date: 11 Mar 2000 01:40:36
Message: <38c9ea64$1@news.povray.org>
I've found Winamp to be as much a drain on my system as POV-Ray.  Something I
didn't expect and certainly can make MS Media Player look good.  Well, scratch
that remark.  Winamp does =look= good anyway.  Using plugins is the reason for
the resource hogging.

Bob

"Jon A. Cruz" <jon### [at] geocitiescom> wrote in message
news:38C9D38A.65366D85@geocities.com...
| Bill DeWitt wrote:
|
| > "Johannes Hubert" <jht### [at] mailacom> wrote :
| > >
| > > If WinAmp didn't give my WinNT BSODs
| > >
| >
| >     Hmm, if WinAmp, perhaps the most widely used app for Windows in the last
| > few years, gives you BSODs, you have failed to install Windows properly.
|
| No.
|
| Might be that he has just the wrong version of of something for the wrong
| ServicePack. Or a different motherboard. Or a different video card. Or an SMP
| machine. Or a different audio card. Or different built-in hardware. Or a
| different version of DirectX. Or some unexpected stuff in his TEMP directory.
| Or some unexpected stuff in his registry...
|
| Just look at the problems Chris Cason had with Creative Labs. If The largest
| sound-card manufacturer (who even gets to tell MS how to do some things) can't
| even get their drivers right, why do you assume any problems can't be due to
| something other than user error?
|
|
| I myself had a system that would choke on hard video output. MPEG playing, for
| example. Immediate death, with not even a BSOD. Just insta-freeze.
|
| Oh, plus MS VJ++ 1.1 had horrible problems with SMP machines. Among other
| things, as soon as you'd save some file that was over a certain size....
| BOOM!!!
| Hmmm. MS's KB search is so bad, I can't find that one off hand. But I did find
| Article ID: Q194901 "BUG: Visual J++ 6.0 May Crash When Opening a Large Java
| File". Their answer? "It's a bug. Don't make large files".
|
| --
| "My new computer's got the clocks, it rocks
| But it was obsolete before I opened the box" - W.A.Y.
|
|
|


Post a reply to this message

From: Peter Popov
Subject: Re: Winamp skin, TubeAmp (80k)
Date: 11 Mar 2000 03:04:14
Message: <y=HJOLxNfzyO8jIcflmjyEWCf3L9@4ax.com>
On Fri, 10 Mar 2000 16:21:23 -0600, David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet>
wrote:

>Johannes Hubert wrote:
>
>> If WinAmp didn't give my WinNT BSODs, I would certainly use your skin
>> with it! Much nicer than the original...
>
>You mean if WinNT didn't give your WinNT BSODs... <duck>

Actually (and I don't believe I'm saying this but it's true) I've seen
an NT machine that was very stable. It was a Compaq server which came
with NT 4 server preinstalled and no other software was ever installed
on it. Everything in the hardware was genuine and the software was the
vital minimum for running a web, mail and ftp server, installed and
configured at Compaq. Needless to say, my brother had an easy time
sysoping the thing, esp. knowing that he had a monthly quota to spend
on tech support :)


Peter Popov
pet### [at] usanet
ICQ: 15002700


Post a reply to this message

From: David Fontaine
Subject: Re: Winamp skin, TubeAmp (80k)
Date: 11 Mar 2000 16:37:28
Message: <38CABBBE.1580F259@faricy.net>
Peter Popov wrote:

> Actually (and I don't believe I'm saying this but it's true) I've seen
> an NT machine that was very stable. It was a Compaq server which came
> with NT 4 server preinstalled and no other software was ever installed
> on it. Everything in the hardware was genuine and the software was the
> vital minimum for running a web, mail and ftp server, installed and
> configured at Compaq. Needless to say, my brother had an easy time
> sysoping the thing, esp. knowing that he had a monthly quota to spend
> on tech support :)

<shrug> Any version of Windows works with the bare minimum. And was it
running MS software? And even if it's stable it's still slow.
Here come the bash police...

--
___     _______________________________________________
 | \     |_          <dav### [at] faricynet> <ICQ 55354965>
 |_/avid |ontaine        http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/

"The only difference between me and a madman is that I'm not mad." -Dali


Post a reply to this message

From: David Fontaine
Subject: Re: Winamp skin, TubeAmp (80k)
Date: 11 Mar 2000 16:38:42
Message: <38CABC09.5CC97552@faricy.net>
Bob Hughes wrote:

> I've found Winamp to be as much a drain on my system as POV-Ray.  Something I
> didn't expect and certainly can make MS Media Player look good.  Well, scratch
> that remark.  Winamp does =look= good anyway.  Using plugins is the reason for
> the resource hogging.

I find Winamp runs quite well on my system. I can even render without skipping and a
minimal performance decrease.

--
___     _______________________________________________
 | \     |_          <dav### [at] faricynet> <ICQ 55354965>
 |_/avid |ontaine        http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/

"The only difference between me and a madman is that I'm not mad." -Dali


Post a reply to this message

From: Steve
Subject: Re: Winamp skin, TubeAmp (80k)
Date: 12 Mar 2000 11:20:32
Message: <slrn8cn87b.6tu.sjlen@zero-pps.localdomain>
On Sat, 11 Mar 2000 15:35:05 -0600, David Fontaine wrote:
>Bob Hughes wrote:
>
>> I've found Winamp to be as much a drain on my system as POV-Ray.  Something I
>> didn't expect and certainly can make MS Media Player look good.  Well, scratch
>> that remark.  Winamp does =look= good anyway.  Using plugins is the reason for
>> the resource hogging.
>
>I find Winamp runs quite well on my system. I can even render without skipping and a
>minimal performance decrease.

I used to find that NAD was a good mp3 player, not so bulky as Winamp, only 
drawback being that you can't use different skins. 

-- 
Cheers
Steve              email mailto:sjl### [at] ndirectcouk

%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee  0 pps. 

web http://www.ndirect.co.uk/~sjlen/

or  http://start.at/zero-pps

  1:39pm  up 1 day, 4 min,  4 users,  load average: 0.28, 0.18, 0.50


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 4 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.