 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Bob Hughes" <omn### [at] hotmail com?subject=PoV-News:> wrote in message
news:3899573b@news.povray.org...
> Took me a moment to realize what you were saying about the darker part, I
see it
> though. Two light gray cylinders and one dark gray.
> It's an interesting looking device, figuring it's purpose is something I
can't
> do.
Yeah, last night I fixed it though. I had only textured one of the
cylinders, the other two were still flat white. Oops. There are all textured
the same now in my final image.
--
Paul Vanukoff
van### [at] primenetcom
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"TonyB" <ben### [at] panamac-comnet> wrote in message
news:3898f978@news.povray.org...
> >... or "Light Sabres of Doom" :)
>
> Maul would piss in his pants if he faced the bastard that could weild that
> thing!
LOL!
--
Paul Vanukoff
van### [at] primenetcom
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"David Fontaine" <dav### [at] faricynet> wrote in message
news:3898F739.9B2E09D1@faricy.net...
> Neat, but why cubical? Then again it is the only tileable polyhedron.
>
Actually, I wanted a sphere neatly split into 27 pieces (3x3x3) but also
wanted the rounded edges, so I went with 27 superellipsoids instead, as my
modelling skills aren't snazzy enough to do my original idea. I assume I
could do it using an isosurface (?) but I haven't even messed with mega yet.
--
Paul Vanukoff
van### [at] primenetcom
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Pretty cool.
If light beams are visible, it's not in dust-free, empty space, hence the
beams have to be so big and powerful to get where they're going without
substantial attentuation (where's yall's imagination??).
Is it media?
Stylistically, the idea of the refracted image of the ball in the center cube
is pretty cool, although I would like to see it a bit bigger. I had to give it
a doubletake, because I thought the ball was just in the closest corner cube
for a sec...
Paul Vanukoff wrote:
> I don't like the way the lighting on the left hand blue guy is darker than
> the others, I'll have to take a look at that, but after a 2.5 hour trace,
> I'm not going to redo it just yet ...
>
> Comments?
>
> --
> Paul Vanukoff
> van### [at] primenetcom
>
> [Image]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Greg M. Johnson" <gre### [at] my-dejanewscom> wrote in message
news:389995BC.E045D849@my-dejanews.com...
> Pretty cool.
Thanks... I thought so.
> If light beams are visible, it's not in dust-free, empty space, hence the
> beams have to be so big and powerful to get where they're going without
> substantial attentuation (where's yall's imagination??).
> Is it media?
No, just carefully textured planes. I set the normal of each plane to point
towards the camera. If you look at it long enough, the beams start looking
2D-ish, but I think the effect is nice nonetheless.
> Stylistically, the idea of the refracted image of the ball in the center
cube
> is pretty cool, although I would like to see it a bit bigger. I had to
give it
> a doubletake, because I thought the ball was just in the closest corner
cube
> for a sec...
>
Actually, that is the reflection of the 3 frontmost nozzles. It does look
like a ball though.
--
Paul Vanukoff
van### [at] primenetcom
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Paul Vanukoff wrote:
> Actually, I wanted a sphere neatly split into 27 pieces (3x3x3) but also
> wanted the rounded edges, so I went with 27 superellipsoids instead, as my
> modelling skills aren't snazzy enough to do my original idea. I assume I
> could do it using an isosurface (?) but I haven't even messed with mega yet.
You could have used 26 because the center one is blocked from all sides. That's
the kind of stuff truly efficient POVers do, but I'm a lazy inefficient
spaghetti POVer. :-)
--
Homepage: http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/
___ ______________________________
| \ |_ <dav### [at] faricynet>
|_/avid |ontaine <ICQ 55354965>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <3898f978@news.povray.org>, TonyB <bennetts@panama.c-
com.net> writes
>>... or "Light Sabres of Doom" :)
>
>Maul would piss in his pants if he faced the bastard that could weild that
>thing!
>
>
I have to credit you, that really did make me laugh out loud!
--
David Parrott E-mail: xam### [at] quayles1demoncouk
ICQ: 13313977
Website: On it's way
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Animate, Animate, Animate.
--
Cheers
Steve email mailto:sjl### [at] ndirectcouk
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
web http://www.ndirect.co.uk/~sjlen/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
8:13pm up 1 day, 4:51, 6 users, load average: 1.26, 1.09, 1.03
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
