 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ken: a non-progressive jpeg. I'm sorry about the progressive one: didn't
know something like that existed. ImageReady is all very new to me. It
*does* have a checkbox for progressive...
Sander
--
"a rose is a rose is a rose"
Ken <tyl### [at] pacbell net> schreef in berichtnieuws
3800AC1D.5B9F804E@pacbell.net...
>
> Is this a progressive jpg ? Crashed my paint program :(
>
> --
> Ken Tyler - 1100+ Povray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
> http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download '9914opt3.jpg' (89 KB)
Preview of image '9914opt3.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
This is just a *small* part of the mosque. Wait till you have seen all of
it! It's a building with about 600 or 700 of those columns....
--
"a rose is a rose is a rose"
TonyB <ben### [at] panamaphoenixnet> schreef in berichtnieuws
3800c6ef@news.povray.org...
> I've never seen so many columns in one room! Have you been there
personally,
> or did you find it in a book?
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ooh, this image is just crying out for focal blur and radiosity - It already
looks great.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sander wrote:
>
> Ken: a non-progressive jpeg. I'm sorry about the progressive one: didn't
> know something like that existed. ImageReady is all very new to me. It
> *does* have a checkbox for progressive...
> Sander
Thanks for the user friendly version. I'm impressed with your work so far.
It looks to be a very ambitious project but you really seem to have a good
start. I think the lighting is a bit busy but I'm sure you will tone that
down as you go :)
--
Ken Tyler - 1100+ Povray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Would area lighting do better for this? It's good stuff and all but I can't
help but think the long shadows should start fuzzing up at the far reaches.
Bob
Andrea Ryan <ary### [at] global2000net> wrote in message
news:3800D2C9.F1BF9AAE@global2000.net...
> It looks great! I saw a picture of it in my history book.
> Brendan Ryan
>
> Sander wrote:
>
> > This is the first result of a 5-year-project ;o)
includes
> > *all* of the mosque - is going to I should rather say. So what you see
here
> > is just a small part. I know there is a lot to do yet: lighting is all
> > wrong, floor should have structure (tiles, different textures), the
arches
> > are too flat, there is no ceiling, no roof, the walls are flat, no
windows,
> > the cathedral has only some columns... The mosque columns are the only
thing
> > I have worked on quite a bit. They all have a different part of the same
> > texture (thank you Peter!).
> > In my view it already looks a bit like the real thing, for that reason I
> > post it. I am very interested in any kind of criticism. And don't say
I'd
> > better post a real photograph: I'm just having plenty of fun trying to
get
> > it look real.
> > Sander
> >
> > =========================
> > "a rose is a rose is a rose"
> >
> > [Image]
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sander wrote:
>
> This is the first result of a 5-year-project ;o)
> *all* of the mosque - is going to I should rather say. So what you see here
> is just a small part. I know there is a lot to do yet: lighting is all
> wrong, floor should have structure (tiles, different textures), the arches
> are too flat, there is no ceiling, no roof, the walls are flat, no windows,
> the cathedral has only some columns... The mosque columns are the only thing
> I have worked on quite a bit. They all have a different part of the same
> texture (thank you Peter!).
> In my view it already looks a bit like the real thing, for that reason I
> post it. I am very interested in any kind of criticism. And don't say I'd
> better post a real photograph: I'm just having plenty of fun trying to get
> it look real.
> Sander
>
> =========================
> "a rose is a rose is a rose"
>
> [Image]
It looks mesmerizing with all those columns.
I like the detail there, especially the ornaments at the top.
I'm not sure about the arcs, they seem a bit too smoothe.
I haven't been there, I only know it from pictures, but I can't imagine the
light there being as it is now, but I guess you're still working on that.
What are the coloured things in the back?
Remco
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 10 Oct 1999 16:52:19 +0200, "Sander" <san### [at] the-internet>
wrote:
>This is the first result of a 5-year-project ;o)
>*all* of the mosque - is going to I should rather say. So what you see here
>is just a small part. I know there is a lot to do yet: lighting is all
>wrong, floor should have structure (tiles, different textures), the arches
>are too flat, there is no ceiling, no roof, the walls are flat, no windows,
>the cathedral has only some columns... The mosque columns are the only thing
>I have worked on quite a bit. They all have a different part of the same
>texture (thank you Peter!).
>In my view it already looks a bit like the real thing, for that reason I
>post it. I am very interested in any kind of criticism. And don't say I'd
>better post a real photograph: I'm just having plenty of fun trying to get
>it look real.
>Sander
>
>=========================
>"a rose is a rose is a rose"
So that's the mysterious project that bugged you so long? I am glad to
see it has turned out amazingly well. Congratulations! I am not going
to pick on lighting etc. because I realise this is a work in progress.
From what I know, the Spanish culture has many Arabic motives
interwoven. Is this the case with the Mezquita? I suggest you take a
look at www.islamicart.com when you have more time, just in case.
Also, are there any arabeskes on the floor/domes/columns? If so, I
suggest you check out Arabeske (www.wozzeck.net/arabeske/).
I am looking forward to seeing more of this. Just one more question --
<OT> how do you think Concierto de Aranjuez will sound if performed
there? </OT> <grin>
Peter Popov
ICQ: 15002700
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The arabs conquered Spain for about a couple hundred years... that's why
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nice image, it needs area lights.
Sander wrote:
>
> This is the first result of a 5-year-project ;o)
> *all* of the mosque - is going to I should rather say. So what you see here
> is just a small part. I know there is a lot to do yet: lighting is all
> wrong, floor should have structure (tiles, different textures), the arches
> are too flat, there is no ceiling, no roof, the walls are flat, no windows,
> the cathedral has only some columns... The mosque columns are the only thing
> I have worked on quite a bit. They all have a different part of the same
> texture (thank you Peter!).
> In my view it already looks a bit like the real thing, for that reason I
> post it. I am very interested in any kind of criticism. And don't say I'd
> better post a real photograph: I'm just having plenty of fun trying to get
> it look real.
> Sander
>
> =========================
> "a rose is a rose is a rose"
>
> [Image]
--
Cheers
Steve email mailto:sjl### [at] ndirectcouk
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
web http://www.ndirect.co.uk/~sjeln/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The acoustics must be a nightmare.
Peter Popov wrote:
>
> On Sun, 10 Oct 1999 16:52:19 +0200, "Sander" <san### [at] the-internet>
> wrote:
>
> >This is the first result of a 5-year-project ;o)
> >*all* of the mosque - is going to I should rather say. So what you see here
> >is just a small part. I know there is a lot to do yet: lighting is all
> >wrong, floor should have structure (tiles, different textures), the arches
> >are too flat, there is no ceiling, no roof, the walls are flat, no windows,
> >the cathedral has only some columns... The mosque columns are the only thing
> >I have worked on quite a bit. They all have a different part of the same
> >texture (thank you Peter!).
> >In my view it already looks a bit like the real thing, for that reason I
> >post it. I am very interested in any kind of criticism. And don't say I'd
> >better post a real photograph: I'm just having plenty of fun trying to get
> >it look real.
> >Sander
> >
> >=========================
> >"a rose is a rose is a rose"
>
> So that's the mysterious project that bugged you so long? I am glad to
> see it has turned out amazingly well. Congratulations! I am not going
> to pick on lighting etc. because I realise this is a work in progress.
>
> From what I know, the Spanish culture has many Arabic motives
> interwoven. Is this the case with the Mezquita? I suggest you take a
> look at www.islamicart.com when you have more time, just in case.
> Also, are there any arabeskes on the floor/domes/columns? If so, I
> suggest you check out Arabeske (www.wozzeck.net/arabeske/).
>
> I am looking forward to seeing more of this. Just one more question --
> <OT> how do you think Concierto de Aranjuez will sound if performed
> there? </OT> <grin>
>
> Peter Popov
> ICQ: 15002700
--
Cheers
Steve email mailto:sjl### [at] ndirectcouk
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
web http://www.ndirect.co.uk/~sjeln/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
