Would area lighting do better for this?  It's good stuff and all but I can't
help but think the long shadows should start fuzzing up at the far reaches.

Bob

Andrea Ryan <ary### [at] global2000net> wrote in message
news:3800D2C9.F1BF9AAE@global2000.net...
> It looks great! I saw a picture of it in my history book.
> Brendan Ryan
>
> Sander wrote:
>
> > This is the first result of a 5-year-project ;o)

includes
> > *all* of the mosque - is going to I should rather say. So what you see
here
> > is just a small part. I know there is a lot to do yet: lighting is all
> > wrong, floor should have structure (tiles, different textures), the
arches
> > are too flat, there is no ceiling, no roof, the walls are flat, no
windows,
> > the cathedral has only some columns... The mosque columns are the only
thing
> > I have worked on quite a bit. They all have a different part of the same
> > texture (thank you Peter!).
> > In my view it already looks a bit like the real thing, for that reason I
> > post it. I am very interested in any kind of criticism. And don't say
I'd
> > better post a real photograph: I'm just having plenty of fun trying to
get
> > it look real.
> > Sander
> >
> > =========================
> > "a rose is a rose is a rose"
> >
> >  [Image]
>

Post a reply to this message