 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Here i go again.
I've looked at Ken's code, and found he used the same idea as I...
So, I've now made a "few" updates to the code..
(passed it four/five version forward)
This one took 5 Mb of memory to use..
A sky-sphere, a big HF, two infinite spheres, and a fog..
I have to add some light-fading to the fireworks, forgot it this time..
AA still isn't good, and the blurring comes from the JPEG compession, even at 100% it
blurs..
Well, here goes.
ask me for code(there are a few macros, all very configurable)
//Spider
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'fireworks1.jpg' (47 KB)
Preview of image 'fireworks1.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sweet!
GrimDude
vos### [at] arkansas net
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Spider wrote:
>
> Here i go again.
> I've looked at Ken's code, and found he used the same idea as I...
> So, I've now made a "few" updates to the code..
> (passed it four/five version forward)
>
> This one took 5 Mb of memory to use..
> A sky-sphere, a big HF, two infinite spheres, and a fog..
>
> I have to add some light-fading to the fireworks, forgot it this time..
>
> AA still isn't good, and the blurring comes from the JPEG compession, even at 100%
it
> blurs..
>
> Well, here goes.
>
> ask me for code(there are a few macros, all very configurable)
>
> //Spider
Well I looked at this earlier and was going to post that
I thought the core of the f'work blossom should be more dense
like in the example I posted. I ran out of time and couldn't
post just then. A while ago a scene in a movie flashed across
the tv screen with a fireworks presentation. You representation
is actualy very close to the f'works I observed on that tv
program. Albeit they were being displayed in a kids little
league baseball park, and their quality was probably marginal
at best, your f'works do appear very much as they did on tv. :)
Your glow in the dark hills on the other hand is something you
need to work on. <Ahem>
A tree or two would also add nicely to the barren landscape.
I have a little utility around here somewhere I could send
to you that makes some pretty nice looking trees. The angle
the trees are output with would match the slope of the hills
without your needing to rotate them at all.
--
Ken Tyler
tyl### [at] pacbellnet
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ken wrote:
>
> Spider wrote:
> >
> > Here i go again.
> > I've looked at Ken's code, and found he used the same idea as I...
> > So, I've now made a "few" updates to the code..
> > (passed it four/five version forward)
> >
> > This one took 5 Mb of memory to use..
> > A sky-sphere, a big HF, two infinite spheres, and a fog..
> >
> > I have to add some light-fading to the fireworks, forgot it this time..
> >
> > AA still isn't good, and the blurring comes from the JPEG compession, even at 100%
it
> > blurs..
> >
> > Well, here goes.
> >
> > ask me for code(there are a few macros, all very configurable)
> >
> > //Spider
>
> Well I looked at this earlier and was going to post that
> I thought the core of the f'work blossom should be more dense
> like in the example I posted. I ran out of time and couldn't
> post just then. A while ago a scene in a movie flashed across
> the tv screen with a fireworks presentation. You representation
> is actualy very close to the f'works I observed on that tv
> program. Albeit they were being displayed in a kids little
> league baseball park, and their quality was probably marginal
> at best, your f'works do appear very much as they did on tv. :)
Is this a compliment? I'm not all that sure it is. :o)
> Your glow in the dark hills on the other hand is something you
> need to work on. <Ahem>
I said I need to do it. I meant it.
> A tree or two would also add nicely to the barren landscape.
> I have a little utility around here somewhere I could send
> to you that makes some pretty nice looking trees. The angle
> the trees are output with would match the slope of the hills
> without your needing to rotate them at all.
Oh... How sweet of you to mention my prog ;-)
(*laugh*) Actually, I'll take a look at the rotation you mention.
I can't seem to find _where_ the error ocurrs.
//Spider
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Spider,
>>Sun, 31 Jan 1999 04:02:33 GMT +0100
The time spent working late paid off.
Graham.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Insomnia gets the best of me.
//Spider
Graham Redway wrote:
>
> Spider,
>
> >>Sun, 31 Jan 1999 04:02:33 GMT +0100
> The time spent working late paid off.
>
> Graham.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
