"IMBJR" <no### [at] spamhere> wrote in message
news:of8n40p7fm2dmr7t8sg105m06t8alm7egd@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 7 Mar 2004 16:12:27 -0600, "Dan P" <dan### [at] yahoocom>

> >Please don't swear in these newsgroups -- think of poor Elsa!
>
> I do not know to whom you refer. Normally, I would not swear, but
> experiencing the wave of apathy and lame excuses here makes me eff.

I'm not even sure who said what anymore :-) And, I'm definitely no stranger
a fight on a newsgroup. Altogether, it's best to keep the f-words off,
whoever said it, just because you never know who is reading (Elsa might be,
for example!). Besides, it is more clever to use other words that have more
impact (the f-word is overused now anyway).

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 05 Mar 2004 20:18:12 +0000, IMBJR <no### [at] spamhere> wrote:
> > Was it supposed to be greyscale, or is PSP's support broken? :-)
>
> Try this at 8-bit.

My Irfan View with full set of plugins refused to display it.

ABX

Post a reply to this message

On Sat, 06 Mar 2004 19:24:21 +0000, IMBJR <no### [at] spamhere> wrote:
> > Fine. I don't wish to download images you don't want me to see. *plonk*
>
> Go on, hide under a shell.

From the fact that you can install everything on your machine how do you
conclude that it is easy/possible for everyone ?

I'm really impreessed by your obstinacy to be not user-friendly to users of
your images.

ABX

Post a reply to this message

"IMBJR" <no### [at] spamhere> wrote in message
news:of8n40p7fm2dmr7t8sg105m06t8alm7egd@4ax.com...
>
> I do not know to whom you refer. Normally, I would not swear, but
> experiencing the wave of apathy and lame excuses here makes me eff.
>
No, your egotisim is taking the front, and it shows very strongly.  I don't
think I'm too unusual, but I have three boxes that I use, only one of which
is connected to anything but itself, and as it is used for nothing but the
internet, it is minimal and will remain that way.  There are some here who's
work I deem highly enough to download and run in one of the other machines,
but if you're using poser and bryce, your file size is going to prevent
that.  While my other machines have 64 and 128 meg graphic cards, this one
has a Diamond Stealth, and I don't deem internet use worthy of anything
higher.  (And before you come up with the normal puke, such as "ludite" or
some such other stupid term, I suggest you email blank checks before telling
me that I should "upgrade" this box.)

Just accept that you're using an oddball format and that expecting everyone
else to be able to decode, or even recognize that it's there is rather
stupid.

Oh, BTW, windows bitmap format, and my printer being capable of 1200 DPI, I
like to be able to push the output to the limits of the printer.  I'm also
fond of printing to the full 11 X 17 that the printer is capable of too.  I
could go 13 X 19 but the paper is too hard to find.

You aren't going to change the world, junior.  It may change, but probably
not at your hand.

Post a reply to this message

"IMBJR" <no### [at] spamhere> wrote in message
news:gj9n40h76tm8sn3l8lqsf3vutoog0v5bon@4ax.com...
>
> Sorry you have such a very narrow of such an expressive language.
>
Would you like to learn how expressive 44 years in a factory can make the
language?  Sorry dud, but I know some women that could show you how
expressive it can really be, and how graphic the mental pictures can be.

I don't think I'm alone, but your attitude has told me that you don't post
anything worth making me go through a bunch of hoops to see.  A leader of
men, or a pacesetter, you are not.

Post a reply to this message

IMBJR wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 21:00:03 -0800, Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom>
> wrote:
>
>> Dan P wrote:
>>> Until Microsoft builds an image format into their browser, it
>>> doesn't stand a chance. Behold, the power of M$!
>>
>> Paint Shop Pro supports it. $50 for a very nice photo editting
>> program.
>>
>> Was it supposed to be greyscale, or is PSP's support broken? :-)
>
> Try this at 8-bit.

Still grey.  Just post a normal JPEG if you want us to see it!

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 8 Mar 2004 17:18:50 -0000, "scott" <sco### [at] spamcom> wrote:

>IMBJR wrote:
>> On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 21:00:03 -0800, Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dan P wrote:
>>>> Until Microsoft builds an image format into their browser, it
>>>> doesn't stand a chance. Behold, the power of M$!
>>>
>>> Paint Shop Pro supports it. $50 for a very nice photo editting
>>> program.
>>>
>>> Was it supposed to be greyscale, or is PSP's support broken? :-)
>>
>> Try this at 8-bit.
>
>Still grey.  Just post a normal JPEG if you want us to see it!

Really. Blimey, you need some updates then I reckon.

>

--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 8 Mar 2004 09:00:15 -0600, "GreyBeard" <r.b### [at] sbcglobalnet>
wrote:

>that.  While my other machines have 64 and 128 meg graphic cards, this one
>has a Diamond Stealth, and I don't deem internet use worthy of anything
>higher.  (And before you come up with the normal puke, such as "ludite" or
>some such other stupid term, I suggest you email blank checks before telling
>me that I should "upgrade" this box.)

You presume too much. Think again.

>
>Just accept that you're using an oddball format and that expecting everyone
>else to be able to decode, or even recognize that it's there is rather
>stupid.

Well, duh. Any other stunning revelations for us?

And I do not expect everyone to view them. I have merely pointed out
how they can - if the platform allows it.

>
>Oh, BTW, windows bitmap format, and my printer being capable of 1200 DPI, I
>like to be able to push the output to the limits of the printer.  I'm also
>fond of printing to the full 11 X 17 that the printer is capable of too.  I
>could go 13 X 19 but the paper is too hard to find.

Who cares!? Another one trying to change the subject.

>
>You aren't going to change the world, junior.  It may change, but probably
>not at your hand.

Dear me. Where on Earth you get such inflated views? Try cutting down
on the hyperbole and try thinking straight.

>

--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 08 Mar 2004 13:16:45 +0100, ABX <abx### [at] abxartpl> wrote:

>On Sat, 06 Mar 2004 19:24:21 +0000, IMBJR <no### [at] spamhere> wrote:
>> > Fine. I don't wish to download images you don't want me to see. *plonk*
>>
>> Go on, hide under a shell.
>
>From the fact that you can install everything on your machine how do you
>conclude that it is easy/possible for everyone ?

I don't. As usual, your conclusions are in error.

>
>I'm really impreessed by your obstinacy to be not user-friendly to users of
>your images.

No you are not. You are quick to lie and this is merely just another
token of the malaise to be found here.

>
>ABX

--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 8 Mar 2004 09:13:07 -0600, "GreyBeard" <r.b### [at] sbcglobalnet>
wrote:

>
>"IMBJR" <no### [at] spamhere> wrote in message
>news:gj9n40h76tm8sn3l8lqsf3vutoog0v5bon@4ax.com...
>>
>> Sorry you have such a very narrow of such an expressive language.
>>
>Would you like to learn how expressive 44 years in a factory can make the
>language?  Sorry dud, but I know some women that could show you how
>expressive it can really be, and how graphic the mental pictures can be.

Well woopie! You know a woman that can swear. Well so what? Does that
make you feel somehow special?

>
>I don't think I'm alone, but your attitude has told me that you don't post
>anything worth making me go through a bunch of hoops to see.  A leader of
>men, or a pacesetter, you are not.

What is wrong with you people that you resort to such hyperbole so
easily?

>

--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com

Post a reply to this message