|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
More tests. After testing collisions with height fields and isosurfaces, I
wanted to test collisions with complex mesh objects. I went to 3Dcafe to
find an appropriate object. I found this carnival slide (doesn't seem to
have the author's name), and decided to test that.
I've just started building a marble machine, but it looks like it's going
to be a lot of effort since predicting where a marble will go is not always
obvious.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'cs2.mpg' (405 KB)
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 15 Oct 2003 11:29:53 -0400, None <Non### [at] onca> wrote:
> More tests.
Nice None.
BTW None, I understand wishes to be unrecognized but any chance to have more
precise name of you here? I find None not very well choosen because of further
refferencing to your work. Imagine how misleading can be sentence "None did
such interesting animation" :-)
ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
ABX <abx### [at] abxartpl> wrote in
news:s8qqovop50hgfbh0r4nga5j576b0df3bv4@4ax.com:
> [...]
> BTW None, I understand wishes to be unrecognized but any chance to
> have more precise name of you here? I find None not very well choosen
> [...]
Understood. Was being lazy when my news software asked me a bunch of
questions: Organization, full name, e-mail, public e-mail, token, etc. I
will change it for future posts.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 17:40:59 +0200, ABX <abx### [at] abxartpl> wrote:
>BTW None, I understand wishes to be unrecognized but any chance to have more
>precise name of you here? I find None not very well choosen because of further
>refferencing to your work. Imagine how misleading can be sentence "None did
>such interesting animation" :-)
>
Polyphemus, the Cyclops had a similar problem with "Noman is slaying me by
guile." :-}
BTW None, I like you animations and your system looks very interesting. I hope
it will get a public airing when it is ready.
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
None <Non### [at] onca> wrote in news:Xns### [at] 204213191226:
> ABX <abx### [at] abxartpl> wrote in
> news:s8qqovop50hgfbh0r4nga5j576b0df3bv4@4ax.com:
>
>> BTW None, I understand wishes to be unrecognized but any chance to
>> have more precise name of you here?
>
> I will change it for future posts.
Just let us know what you choose ;)
--
Tom
_________________________________
The Internet Movie Project
http://www.imp.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> More tests. After testing collisions with height fields and isosurfaces,
I
> wanted to test collisions with complex mesh objects. I went to 3Dcafe to
> find an appropriate object. I found this carnival slide (doesn't seem to
> have the author's name), and decided to test that.
>
> I've just started building a marble machine, but it looks like it's going
> to be a lot of effort since predicting where a marble will go is not
always
> obvious.
Mmm... very interesting...
Thanks.
Andrew.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |