On 15 Oct 2003 11:29:53 -0400, None <Non### [at] on ca> wrote:
> More tests.
Nice None.
BTW None, I understand wishes to be unrecognized but any chance to have more
precise name of you here? I find None not very well choosen because of further
refferencing to your work. Imagine how misleading can be sentence "None did
such interesting animation" :-)
ABX
Post a reply to this message
|