seriously, how big are codecs anyway?  not very.  i don't have a problem
downloading and installing a new one if i'm just showed where to get
it.  incidentally, i already had divx before this big discussion as it
can be used to convert dvds to avi (or something like that) and dvd
captures make for good hollywood graphics study material.

"Rick [Kitty5]" wrote:
> 
> > Please use MPEG-1, MPEG-2 or GIF(I know, I know) everybody can view these
> 
> firstly GIF? no, never in a million years, might as well post fli or flc's,
> and i dont render in full colour to have it destroyed converting it to 256.
> 
> i am unable to make mpeg's directly, and am far from happy converting one
> lossy codec to another, might as well not bother !
> 
> after all DivX;-) is only a video codec !!. its not wrapped up in its own
> peice of bloated spyware, like real player which most people seem to have
> installed
> 
> Rick

Post a reply to this message

On Sun, 6 Aug 2000 10:49:38 -0400, "Bill DeWitt"
<the### [at] earthlinknet> wrote:

>    ... and even so, that would mean that it is available by automatic
>download even though the Evil MicroSoft Empire doesn't support* it.
>
>    *(As if other players come with it loaded already...)

Players play. Codecs code and decode. That's the beauty of it, a
player can use any codec and a codec may be used in any player (or any
video processing program for that matter).

The only players that I can think of that don't use shared codecs are
MPEG, Smacker, Bink and FLI players. That sucks because you can't use,
say, Bink in, say, Adobe Premiere, while you can use DivX;-)

And no, DivX;-) is not available through automatic download. Maybe the
original DivX is but I don't know if they are compatible.


Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
Personal e-mail : pet### [at] usanet
TAG      e-mail : pet### [at] tagpovrayorg

Post a reply to this message

"Peter Popov" <pet### [at] usanet> wrote :
>
> And no, DivX;-) is not available through automatic download.

    Then how did I get it?

Post a reply to this message

>     Then how did I get it?

Someone else that was using your machine got it maybe?

Post a reply to this message

On Sun, 6 Aug 2000 22:57:47 -0400, "Bill DeWitt"
<the### [at] earthlinknet> wrote:

>
>"Peter Popov" <pet### [at] usanet> wrote :
>>
>> And no, DivX;-) is not available through automatic download.
>
>    Then how did I get it?

By direct download, either you (but you don't remember) or someone
else using that machine. Maybe it was installed by some app or game.
Either way, ifyou don't trust me, remove it from your computer and see
if Media Player will succeed in downloading it. It didn't here so why
should it work on your machine?


Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
Personal e-mail : pet### [at] usanet
TAG      e-mail : pet### [at] tagpovrayorg

Post a reply to this message

"Libellule" <lib### [at] insectesnet> wrote :
>
> >     Then how did I get it?
>
> Someone else that was using your machine got it maybe?

    Nope, Alexander is smart, but at 4 years old he is not quite ready to
break my password.

Post a reply to this message

"Peter Popov" <pet### [at] usanet> wrote :
>
> It didn't here so why
> should it work on your machine?

    Because some people seem to have trouble with windows that I don't have.
I don't have to reboot everytime I blink, I don't have notepad lock up the
system, I don't have to reinstall windows every other week, and I don't find
these problems with WP.

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 7 Aug 2000 07:59:36 -0400, "Bill DeWitt"
<the### [at] earthlinknet> wrote:

>> It didn't here so why
>> should it work on your machine?
>
>    Because some people seem to have trouble with windows that I don't have.
>I don't have to reboot everytime I blink, I don't have notepad lock up the
>system, I don't have to reinstall windows every other week, and I don't find
>these problems with WP.

You're well known to have the only working copy of Windows ever
shipped :)

Anyway, it's just not available for download on microsoft.com . Not
even if I browse it with lynx.


Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
Personal e-mail : pet### [at] usanet
TAG      e-mail : pet### [at] tagpovrayorg

Post a reply to this message

<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>

<ul>
<li>
<b><i><u><font face="Arial,Helvetica"><font color="#FF0000"><font size=+1>"Embrace
modernity and the Microsoft line of office
products."</font></font></font></u></i></b></li>

<li>
<b><i><u><font face="Arial,Helvetica"><font color="#FF0000"><font size=+1>"It
works for me, therefore it is not a problem."</font></font></font></u></i></b></li>
</ul>

<br> 
<p>Dave Blandston wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>Just an idea - if you're posting an animation that
requires some special
<br>codec, like Divx, it would save those of us who don't want to go hunt
down
<br>and install additional codecs the time of downloading unusable animations
if
<br>everyone posting those things would mention it in the subject line.
It
<br>doesn't help to list the additional requirement in the body of the
post,
<br>because that part doesn't become visible until after the animation
file
<br>itself is finished downloading. I'm sure there are many fine codecs
<br>available out there, but I don't want to install any more stuff than
<br>necessary on my computer because of the increased chances of crashes,
<br>clashes, etc.  ;-)
<p>Regards,
<br>Dave</blockquote>
</html>

Post a reply to this message

"Greg M. Johnson" <gre### [at] my-dejanewscom> wrote :
>
>"It works for me, therefore it is not a problem

    "I can't make it work, therefore it is the fault of the software"

Post a reply to this message