POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.animations : Archer - Charcter study 03 kbbu MPEG Server Time
20 Jul 2024 21:30:53 EDT (-0400)
  Archer - Charcter study 03 kbbu MPEG (Message 11 to 20 of 28)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 8 Messages >>>
From: Marc-Hendrik Bremer
Subject: Re: Archer - Charcter study 03 kbbu MPEG
Date: 18 Jul 2000 17:13:31
Message: <3974c87b@news.povray.org>
Tony[B] schrieb in Nachricht <39739c30@news.povray.org>...
>That's very good. I commend you for trying.

Thanks.

>You might want to use splines
>for controlling the movement. It would make things easier for you.

Don't know if this would help. All I can control of Peter Houston's Blobman
are the angles of the joints. Would be nice just to define a path for the
hand and let all the rest be done by an .inc-file or something. But I'll
leave that for someone who really knows what he is doing when he uses
splines.

Marc-Hendrik


Post a reply to this message

From: Marc-Hendrik Bremer
Subject: Re: Archer - Charcter study 03 kbbu MPEG
Date: 18 Jul 2000 17:13:44
Message: <3974c888@news.povray.org>
ryan constantine schrieb in Nachricht <39738658.73DC9FB5@yahoo.com>...

>[...]so  why is the archer left-handed?


Hm ... well ... aehm ... actually I didn't even noticed it before :-) I
thought: You have this bow, put it in his right hand! Of course you are
right that this makes him left-handed doesn't matter, does it?

Marc-Hendrik


Post a reply to this message

From: Marc-Hendrik Bremer
Subject: Re: Archer - Charcter study 03 kbbu MPEG
Date: 18 Jul 2000 17:14:45
Message: <3974c8c5@news.povray.org>
Heart of Moray's IK-Plugin, but I think it won't work to well with Peter
Houstons Blobman even if it would be nice to have the computer calculate the
steps 'in between'.
I agree that the left arm is jerky and the twist of the right hand at the
end. Perhaps I can convince myself to put some more work in this - it will
be somewhat hard because all I have is an array-declaration with the
joint-angles, but as long as I have to change only the left arm it might be
possible.

Marc-Hendrik

Bob Hughes schrieb in Nachricht <39738590@news.povray.org>...
>Well I guess that leaves Moray out for doing any IK with it, since he is a
>"blob" man.  I'm not sure though what Moray might be able to do with it.
>Perhaps a stand-in set of primitives and then use the transformations you
get.
>Could be difficult to transfer.
>It didn't look terribly bad to me, a little jerky is all; but hey, that
goes
>for many things I've seen or made myself.
>
>Bob
>
>
>


Post a reply to this message

From: ryan constantine
Subject: Re: Archer - Charcter study 03 kbbu MPEG
Date: 18 Jul 2000 18:48:36
Message: <3974DE6F.5ECA082E@yahoo.com>
of course it doesn't matter.  i was just wondering if it meant you were
left handed as well.  i guess you aren't.  have you ever done archery? 
i have.  it is a lot of fun.  i took some classes; beat my instructor at
the end-of-class competition.

Marc-Hendrik Bremer wrote:
> 
> ryan constantine schrieb in Nachricht <39738658.73DC9FB5@yahoo.com>...
> 
> >[...]so  why is the archer left-handed?
> 
> Hm ... well ... aehm ... actually I didn't even noticed it before :-) I
> thought: You have this bow, put it in his right hand! Of course you are
> right that this makes him left-handed doesn't matter, does it?
> 
> Marc-Hendrik


Post a reply to this message

From: Marc-Hendrik Bremer
Subject: Re: Archer - Charcter study 03 kbbu MPEG
Date: 19 Jul 2000 08:12:18
Message: <39759b22$1@news.povray.org>
No, I'm not left handed - was just too ignorant ;-) and no I have not done
archery by now. Perhaps one day.
Is my blobman doing right? Of course I bet today you used those
more-high-tech-bows with counter-weights and all but the procedure should be
quiet the same (?). And another question: where is the string connected? In
the middle of the bow? I thought so by now, but then there is an angle
between the way of the string (when released) and the arrow, because the
arrow has to avoid collision with the bow. Does the archer compensate it or
is the another mechanism to do so? Hope you understand what I mean  :-}.

Marc-Hendrik


ryan constantine schrieb in Nachricht <3974DE6F.5ECA082E@yahoo.com>...
>of course it doesn't matter.  i was just wondering if it meant you were
>left handed as well.  i guess you aren't.  have you ever done archery?
>i have.  it is a lot of fun.  i took some classes; beat my instructor at
>the end-of-class competition.
>
>Marc-Hendrik Bremer wrote:
>>
>> ryan constantine schrieb in Nachricht <39738658.73DC9FB5@yahoo.com>...
>>
>> >[...]so  why is the archer left-handed?
>>
>> Hm ... well ... aehm ... actually I didn't even noticed it before :-) I
>> thought: You have this bow, put it in his right hand! Of course you are
>> right that this makes him left-handed doesn't matter, does it?
>>
>> Marc-Hendrik


Post a reply to this message

From: ryan constantine
Subject: Re: Archer - Charcter study 03 kbbu MPEG
Date: 19 Jul 2000 15:42:07
Message: <397602EB.BA63BD0@yahoo.com>
you're modelling a bow between a long and a short bow.  i used a recurve
bow (although my teacher and any student who had one could use a
compound bow).  the string has a loop on each end.  the bow has grooves
cut about string diameter-deep that circle the tips about an inch away. 
here is a crude drawing:
     ____tip
     \  \
      \  \
       === groove
      | \  \
      |  \  \
string|   \  \

hope that helps.  also, the arrows have three feathers.  they are
arranged such that as they leave the bow, they look like this:

     |    |
     |    |
     |    |\
     |    | \
     |    |  \
     |    |  (0)-----
     |    |  /
     |    | /
     |    |/
     |    |
     |    |

this is the view as a lefty would see it as he fired.  the arrow is
always on the same side of the bow as your face.  the arrow does just
fine going around the bow in this manner so there is no
archer-compensation.

Marc-Hendrik Bremer wrote:
> 
> No, I'm not left handed - was just too ignorant ;-) and no I have not done
> archery by now. Perhaps one day.
> Is my blobman doing right? Of course I bet today you used those
> more-high-tech-bows with counter-weights and all but the procedure should be
> quiet the same (?). And another question: where is the string connected? In
> the middle of the bow? I thought so by now, but then there is an angle
> between the way of the string (when released) and the arrow, because the
> arrow has to avoid collision with the bow. Does the archer compensate it or
> is the another mechanism to do so? Hope you understand what I mean  :-}.
> 
> Marc-Hendrik
> 
> ryan constantine schrieb in Nachricht <3974DE6F.5ECA082E@yahoo.com>...
> >of course it doesn't matter.  i was just wondering if it meant you were
> >left handed as well.  i guess you aren't.  have you ever done archery?
> >i have.  it is a lot of fun.  i took some classes; beat my instructor at
> >the end-of-class competition.
> >
> >Marc-Hendrik Bremer wrote:
> >>
> >> ryan constantine schrieb in Nachricht <39738658.73DC9FB5@yahoo.com>...
> >>
> >> >[...]so  why is the archer left-handed?
> >>
> >> Hm ... well ... aehm ... actually I didn't even noticed it before :-) I
> >> thought: You have this bow, put it in his right hand! Of course you are
> >> right that this makes him left-handed doesn't matter, does it?
> >>
> >> Marc-Hendrik


Post a reply to this message

From: Marc-Hendrik Bremer
Subject: Re: Archer - Charcter study 03 kbbu MPEG
Date: 19 Jul 2000 15:59:09
Message: <3976088d$1@news.povray.org>
Thanks you very much! It's just like I imagined. I have not modeled the
groove and the loops due to laziness and the string is now "connected" at
the tip, but the rest is as it should be. Good to hear :-)

Marc-Hendrik


Post a reply to this message

From: Jamie Davison
Subject: Re: Archer - Charcter study 03 kbbu MPEG
Date: 19 Jul 2000 17:42:24
Message: <MPG.13e01b8052de5391989758@news.povray.org>
On Wed, 19 Jul 2000 12:35:07 -0700, ryan constantine wrote...
> hope that helps.  also, the arrows have three feathers.  they are
> arranged such that as they leave the bow, they look like this:
> 
>      |    |
>      |    |
>      |    |\
>      |    | \
>      |    |  \
>      |    |  (0)-----
>      |    |  /
>      |    | /
>      |    |/
>      |    |
>      |    |
> 
> this is the view as a lefty would see it as he fired.  the arrow is
> always on the same side of the bow as your face.  the arrow does just
> fine going around the bow in this manner so there is no
> archer-compensation.

<pedant>

You fire a gun, you shoot a bow.

</pedant>

Bye for now,
     Jamie.


Post a reply to this message

From: ryan constantine
Subject: Re: Archer - Charcter study 03 kbbu MPEG
Date: 20 Jul 2000 04:40:04
Message: <3976B75E.24AB3AAC@yahoo.com>
doesn't one shoot ARROWS?  smart ___ :)


Post a reply to this message

From: Jamie Davison
Subject: Re: Archer - Charcter study 03 kbbu MPEG
Date: 20 Jul 2000 18:34:04
Message: <MPG.13e158518e9d34c898975c@news.povray.org>
On Thu, 20 Jul 2000 01:25:02 -0700, ryan constantine wrote...
> doesn't one shoot ARROWS?  smart ___ :)

In which case, you fire bullets/pellets/slugs/shells...

Unless the bullet is being shot from a sling...

And I wouldn't have wanted to fire my bow, as it had a magnesium riser...

(clarification, three piece bows have two limbs and a riser.  You hold 
the riser, which is the central portion of the completed bow.)

Seriously, the act of propelling a projectile from a bow is called 
shooting.  Although nowadays almost nobody cares about terminology, 
unless they're one of those anal retentive archers with stabilisers in 
all directions which can pick up 35 different satellite tv channels :)

(although the club captain did a rather wonderful impersonation of 
'serious' archers which had most of the rest of the club creased up, 
except for the aforementioned 'serious' archers.)

Personally, I shot a plain three piece takedown recurve bow rated at 35 
pounds draw, which I pulled to about 45 pounds due to the length of my 
arms.  Oh, and a word of advice, backdrops don't tend to stop field point 
arrows at twenty yards very well (I only had field points at the time, 
and broke two of my arrows before I got the message...

And any comments about the 35 pounds draw being a bit on the weedy side 
will be ignored, as I was a student at the time, and couldn't afford 
anything more.

Bye for now,
     Jamie.


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 8 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.