 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Tom Melly
Subject: Re: POV-Ray for Windows, version 3.5 RC2 expired early, and there is no replacement at the moment
Date: 30 Apr 2002 04:59:03
Message: <3cce5cd7$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
news:ogdscu89hrficpjq7bema2nu0gboog203p@4ax.com...
>
> Any chance to share knowladge what happened ? If it is something around
> metodology of development it could increase experience of other teams.
>
plus we're really nosey....
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Tom A
Subject: Re: POV-Ray for Windows, version 3.5 RC2 expired early, and there is no replacement at the moment
Date: 30 Apr 2002 10:57:42
Message: <3CCEB0E6.4AF1A12A@my-deja.com>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
ingo wrote:
>
> One would realy expect that raytracing would have learned people some
> patience, but it seems to be the opposite.
LOL!
I think it taught me too much patience. Last night I let a picture
parse for about half an hour before I realized I had an infinite loop.
"D'oh! Stupid missing #end" - not Homer Simpson
>
> Ingo
--
Tom A.
There's nothing like cooking and eating outside, unless you like
comfort. - Henny Youngman
Deja mail is gone. Look for me at raugost at yahoo . com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Mike Williams
Subject: POV-Ray for Windows, version 3.5 RC2 expired early, and there is no replacement at the moment
Date: 30 Apr 2002 13:04:21
Message: <H2OqQCAwLkz8EwzR@econym.demon.co.uk>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Having previously worked in several software houses, I think that the
team has done a brilliant job of hitting their software deadline 17
times, and only missing by one day once. We used to miss about half of
our software deadlines. There'd be somebody who decided to put in a tiny
last minute change that caused the entire package to fail to compile
correctly.
--
Mike Williams
Gentleman of Leisure
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Glen Berry
Subject: Re: POV-Ray for Windows, version 3.5 RC2 expired early, and there is no replacement at the moment
Date: 30 Apr 2002 16:57:39
Message: <BATPPM3JveBUIqF17Oqw2r895EdN@4ax.com>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002 08:08:32 +0100, Mike Williams <mik### [at] nospam please>
wrote:
>Having previously worked in several software houses, I think that the
>team has done a brilliant job of hitting their software deadline 17
>times, and only missing by one day once.
Yes, the POV-Team is pretty darn good at what they do. There's no
question about that. I just wish that the quality level of POV would
somehow rub off on the quality level of the operating system I use to
run it. :)
Later,
Glen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Tim Nikias
Subject: Re: POV-Ray for Windows, version 3.5 RC2 expired early, and there is no replacement at the moment
Date: 1 May 2002 07:32:10
Message: <3CCFD20A.D1DCCBE3@gmx.de>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Yeah, really nosey.
Tom Melly wrote:
> plus we're really nosey....
--
Tim Nikias
Homepage: http://www.digitaltwilight.de/no_lights/index.html
Email: Tim### [at] gmxde
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Chris Cason
Subject: Re: POV-Ray for Windows, version 3.5 RC2 expired early, and there is no replacement at the moment
Date: 1 May 2002 11:36:45
Message: <3cd00b8d@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Tim Nikias" <tim### [at] gmxde> wrote in message news:3CCFD20A.D1DCCBE3@gmx.de...
> Yeah, really nosey.
>
> Tom Melly wrote:
>
> > plus we're really nosey....
I really needed to get some certain code that I am awaiting into this RC, as
the time for testing is running out, and this code needs to be well-tested.
The folks supplying the code initial promised it early Monday (my time), and
then that slipped, and it slipped again, and finally we decided to just release
the RC without the code.
When it turns up I'll make an EXE-only release with it built in, and just
hope enough folks download it to make it well-tested before the next RC.
-- Chris
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
